As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
3 million dollars buys allot of not well thought out thinking in the case of Lara Loomer, who upon meeting with the Jewdwarf Zellinskyy, has now joined the Mark Levin assassinate your enemies dialogue when it comes to Vladimir Putin.
As I doubt Lara Loomer is getting her intelligence from United States agencies, it would be a conclusion that her sources on Russia are her new hip mates in Kiev, her Bulan heritage of the whispering Mosaad, with a note passed from British intelligence as they are always up to intrigue.
Loomer lays out her protocols to assassinate Vladimir Putin or anyone else.
Meet you on the other side.
American blogger Laura Loomer, who is called one of the allies of US President Donald Trump, said that if she were president, she would kill Russian President Vladimir Putin. She said this in an interview with Kyiv Independent.
"If I were the president of the United States, and Russia was supplying weapons to Iran, I would kill Vladimir Putin... If I were the president of the United States and found out that another country was lying to my face and supplying weapons to the country I was fighting with, a country that was on state television 20 times a day they say "Kill Trump," "Death to America," "Death to Trump," I would find a way for this world leader to tragically and completely unexpectedly die of a heart attack," said Loomer.
If Russia supplied weapons to Iran.
Lying about suppling weapons to a country you were fighting with, would assassinate with a heart attack.
So if someone supplies weapons to Iran or lied about supplying weapons to some country, Lara Loomer would assassinate them.
We can revisit who it was who exactly was advancing Iranian weapons technology in that Designer Negro who betrayed the Persian Patriots so his Tehran group could stay in power which he provided a jet load of cash too..........
The Core Details of the 2019 Incident:
- The Target: The drone was an unarmed, high-altitude Navy RQ-4A Global Hawk (specifically a BAMS-D variant), a massive intelligence-gathering asset with a 131-foot wingspan valued at over $220 million. [1]
- The Location: The shootdown took place over the Strait of Hormuz near the Gulf of Oman. A sharp dispute immediately arose regarding boundaries; the U.S. military provided tracking data showing the aircraft was operating strictly in international airspace, while Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) maintained it had strayed across their territorial coastal borders. [1, 2]
- The Weapon: The drone was brought down by an Iranian third-khordad surface-to-air missile system fired from a station near Goruk, Iran.
If you were thinking of a slightly earlier event where a drone wasn't shot down but rather electronically hijacked and brought down intact, that is the 2011 Iran–U.S. RQ-170 Incident, which took place along the Afghan border.The highly classified "Stealth Black Hawk" helicopter wreckage from the May 2, 2011, Osama bin Laden raid was indeed examined by Chinese military engineers during the Obama administration. [1, 2]While the events occurred in the same year (2011), the timeline shows the helicopter incident happened first in May, followed by the stealth drone hijacking in December. Both situations directly accelerated China's military tech development through foreign access to American hardware.
Yes trading for bin Laden's corpse netted the Chinamen a great deal of American technology, but the George Bush II allowed China to confiscate a spy plane early on too..........
But who is the main source for America's enemies of American weapons?
China is the primary recipient of unauthorized transfers of American military and aerospace technology from Israel.During the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s, several high-profile intelligence leaks and defense disputes erupted between Washington and Tel Aviv over the diversion of highly classified, U.S.-funded military assets to Beijing without American authorization. [1, 2]The documented history of these restricted tech transfers includes several prominent cases:1. The IAI Lavi Fighter and the Chinese J-10During the 1980s, the United States heavily funded Israel’s development of its own advanced fighter jet, the IAI Lavi, which was modeled on the structural blueprints of the American F-16 Fighting Falcon. When Israel canceled the project due to soaring costs, intelligence agencies discovered that the blueprints and associated secret U.S. aviation technology were subsequently sold to Beijing. As detailed in the historical analysis of U.S. Military Technology Sales via WRMEA, this data allowed China to directly develop its own modern, front-line fighter jet, the Chengdu J-10. [1]2. The Patriot Missile System ExploitsIn 1992, U.S. intelligence officials investigated reports that Israel had illegally shared highly classified radar and guidance information from the American Patriot missile defense system with Beijing. While officially denied by Israeli representatives at the time, the incident severely strained diplomatic ties. This came alongside separate CIA confirmations that Israel had shared technology from the American Sidewinder air-to-air missile to help China construct its Python III missile variants. [, 2, 3]3. The Harpy Drone Crisis (2004–2005)A major defense rift occurred when Israel attempted to return a fleet of Chinese "Harpy" loitering munitions to Beijing for routine upgrades. The Pentagon discovered that Israel had upgraded these attack drones using advanced, shared American technology without permission. This unauthorized transfer resulted in severe U.S. military sanctions against Israel's defense sector. You can review the details of the resulting diplomatic freeze in the archive report on U.S. Sanctions Over Arms Sales to China from The Guardian. [1]4. Direct Intelligence AssessmentsThe scale of this backdoor channel was officially confirmed by the highest levels of U.S. intelligence. In the 1990s, CIA Director James Woolsey formally testified before a Senate Government Affairs Committee that Israel had been actively passing restricted U.S. technological secrets to China for over a decade. The motivations and the geopolitical ripple effects are further detailed in the global China-Israel Relations Overview on Wikipedia
We can leave the historical reality of the recent past and venture into another reality of Lara Loomer murdering Vladimir Putin, who happens to be the leader of Russia.
These would be the consequences.
The Kremlin would either retaliate by nuking key American military groups in the tens of thousands as in carrier groups or US bases, knowing the United States would not start a strategic nuclear war over the retaliation.
The Kremlin would assassinate all those behind the assassination of Vladimir Putin, and the Russian services have proven most thorough in retaliation.
So the Loomer policy would produce tens of thousands of US dead or the decapitation of the United States leadership.
In the heady world of the killing of leaders of Libya or Iran in recent history, the consequences and realities are much different when it comes to nations which will strike back with extreme prejudice. It is why nations, even the most murderous like London does not engage in murdering foreign leaders as they do not want to be picked off or their looting platform destabilized.
Lara Loomer is 3 million dollars ignorant as even Mark Levin has shut up about his advocacy of murder of foreign leaders. What one nation does, another will retaliate over. This Tel Aviv operation to kill the Iranian leadership was sound, but this festering sore can not be left as Iran is going to in time start picking off Jews and Americans.
With these realities examined, the situation which Tel Aviv must examine, is that according to the Loomer Doctrine, her presidency would give heart attacks to all the Jews in Tel Aviv who have been behind lying to the United States and supplying weapons to enemies of the United States.
When ignorance is expressed, it is exposed for how ludicrous the chattering is.
I do not believe that Lara Loomer is a big enough 3 million dollar platform to cause the Kremlin to take action, but then again, no one in their right mind would want to be put on an FSB list of threats to President Vladimir Putin as the same ways expressed might appear expressed from the Kremlin.
Nuff Said
agtG
