Sunday, August 9, 2026

The Colby Doctrine

 



As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

As we review the headlines, the CIA propaganda is driving the storyline for a purpose. The Saudi's are stating America can not protect them, just as the Europeans.



Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan:

"The era of relying on the United States is over. How can Trump protect us when he is incapable even of protecting his own country?"


The Molotov Mob crowd can not voice the talking points that the US arsenal is depleted with no mention of Star Wars.

The Lame Cherry will explain all of this by God's Grace for you again. Meet you on the other side. 

Trump used ‘virtually all’ US long-range
precision missiles during Israel-US War On
Iran sources say

Trump (Under Orders) Used 'Virtually All’ of
US ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles in
Israeli-Directed Iran War

US Long-Range Precision Missile Stockpiles
Drained by US-Israel War On Iran

 

As one of the last nuclear warfare experts on the physics of these interesting atomic devices, enters now Elbridge Colby, grandson of CIA Director, William Colby. Read the following layout and I will explain on the other side what you are reading and why.




The Pentagon is drafting a new nuclear weapons strategy to prepare for a potential conflict with China or Russia, marking a significant shift in US military tactics.

The strategy, overseen by Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s policy chief, would place greater emphasis on shorter-range tactical nuclear weapons in the event of a regional war, rather than relying on long-range strategic missiles.

Mr Colby was expected to discuss the plans on Wednesday during a private military event in Nebraska while visiting the US Strategic Command, which oversees nuclear forces, NBC reported.

According to sources familiar with the plans, the strategy is designed to address scenarios in which US allies come under attack from Russia or China in a regional conflict.

A senior US defence department official told NBC: “Our view is that we need credible nuclear options.”

The strategy would not restrict Donald Trump’s choices but instead “expand the president’s option space by providing him with realistic and credible options and therefore strengthen deterrence”, the official said.

 

Mr Colby has long argued in favour of tactical nuclear weapons, which are smaller, shorter-range warheads designed for battlefield use or against specific military targets rather than entire cities.

He has also argued that the US existing nuclear doctrine lacks credibility because it relies heavily on the threat of launching long-range strategic weapons capable of destroying an adversary’s entire nuclear force.

The senior defence department official added: “If you actually want extended deterrence to be credible, you have to provide the nation’s political leadership with nuclear capabilities that common sense indicates you could actually use.

“Otherwise you’re reducing our leadership’s options to extreme choices that the adversary won’t find credible – and that is not going to fare well for deterrence.”

Deterring conflict without increasing risk of nuclear war

The proposed shift has reignited Cold War-era debates about US nuclear policy and how the country should manage its arsenal to deter conflict without increasing the risk of nuclear war.

Critics argue that placing greater emphasis on tactical nuclear weapons could lower the threshold for their use by making them appear more usable in conventional conflicts.

Others have warned it could reduce military preparedness for scenarios in which a president might instead choose to deploy long-range strategic weapons.

A senior congressional aide familiar with the proposal told NBC: “It’s hard to imagine a study that is more out of line with President Trump’s stated position of making our nuclear deterrent great again.

“He clearly wants more options and capabilities, not less. This study is big-time low-T.”


This will surprise all of you, but the Lame Cherry states that the United States can no longer protect the world. This is never discussed nor voiced, but it is the fact. Defeat will be the outcome of the United States having to deal with the Russian, Chinese, Iranian, North Korean extended group in war. America does not have the bombs, bullets or personnel to kill this many million enemy on battlefields.

This is why the Bush Doctrine initiated the building of small tactical nukes for battlefield use. The Bush Cheney Doctrine moved to shift this nuclear war into the vacant steppes of Asia, where large numbers of troops could be killed readily with the overlapping use of small nuclear weapons on the field.

You should have enough information to start assembling the Colby Arrangement. As this blog has stated, Russia is being taught to come out of her den, in being awarded a victory in Ukraine. Both China and Russia, are being shown that hypersonics and drones can deplete US, and Mideast defenses. These military operations are con games for a bigger game. Elbridge Colby is the point man for this US Doctrine, which is designed to take a defeat outcome into a victory projection, where Russia and China will accept the use of tactical nuclear weapons by America and them on battlefields and not graduate to strategic nuclear weapons.......the heavies.

The Lame Cherry emboldened what is the gambit in this game.


scenarios in which US allies come under attack from Russia or China in a regional conflict.


Notice this is not the United States under attack. This is not the US and allies under attack. This is allies of the United States under attack. Russia, China, North Korea and Iran are going to be attacking the allies or the front of war in the spheres of these powers, and this is where tactical nuclear weapons will be unleashed for victory of the United States.
One can draw this front utilizing the stories posted in which nations are moving to nuclear stance. Finland, Poland, Romania, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, India, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan.

Saudi Arabia has voiced this loudly as much as others have. They are all convinced of America's inability, and Saudi Arabia has access in funding Pakistan's nuclear bombs to those weapons. We are not at that graduation point in this Obama Green Scheme Shift to Asia, but the movement is developing for these nations which include Germany and France to develop nuclear postures in all will have their own weapons. This evolves and it will not be the United States dropping their small nuclear weapons, it will be the above mentioned front nations.

The nuclear war which is being developed will be fought on short range battlefields in this arc from Japan, to Pakistan to Finland.

The Molotov Mob will whine, as their London funding and direction will direct, that this vile, but it is a reality which the Colby Doctrine advocates that other lesser peoples this time get vaporized and die in mass, instead of thee American Peoples who have been set up as fodder in this London Paris bankers cabal who set up extermination wars for Americans from the Civil War to the world wars for their profit by manipulation.

Now you have had this explained to you in adult terms by the Lame Cherry.



Nuff Said

agtG