McKinley concerning the global warming quotes in correlation to the
ocean CO2 process study relation to what Reid Bryson which is being debated.
Respectfully, Mr. Bryson and yourself, Professor McKinley are both in
the same menagerie of thought looking at the same type of problem and
coming to the same incorrect conclusion as Professor Einstein in
attempting a combined theory inside this dimension.
I will not rehash the sides in volcano and carbon prints which are both
akin to your quoted family house with smoke coming out of it in both of
you are seeing smoke, but not equating the heat source.
Simply put Professor, how much heat does volcanic dust put into the
atmosphere? How much heat does carbon dioxide generate? The answer as
you know is, none and none, as combined elements or single elements
generate no heat in nature. It is only the degradation of elements into
smaller fission or greater fusion which creates heat in this dimensional
sphere.
Mr. Bryson's smoke clouds dissipating and your blanket of smoke are not
addressing the heat source which is that heat generating nuclear device
in space called the sun.
I ask you to stay with this Professor as it will assist your research.
The yellow dwarf is a notorious solar combination in fluctuating
immensely as the norm. Our sun has actually behaved remarkably well in
being stable compared to other solar systems whose planets range from
scorched at times to sub zero extremes.
It is troubling that so many scientists in astrophysics have not
concluded like the layman that the sun produces different bandwidths or
frequencies of heat cycles. The focus is left at radiant heat, but never
exploring a situation such as microwaves like one would find in their
kitchen. The sun produces a variety of heating frequencies and in this
solar cycle has seen increased not radiant heat, but increased off scale
heating units.
This is how glaciers can melt without the heat rising enough to melt
them on a global scale.
What this means is heat which in addition to radiant heat, but that is
not deflected by standard earth conditions such as clouds or dust is
behind the conditions science is mistakenly concluding is CO2 related.
If I might to explain, in a microwave the water gets hot in a cup, but
not the cup until it transfers the heat retained in the water into the
cup. This is what is occurring in the ice melting as earth temperature
has not risen enough to allow the melting, but a different bandwidth of
solar heating is like in a microwave heating the liquid as this specific
heating is more conducive to the H2O combination.
What this means for your oceans from a meteorological standpoint is not
super storms as many have incorrectly claimed and been exposed of as
wrong in the hurricane cycles, but more water vapor from the oceans
gathered into weather fronts and bringing the excess moisture into the
arid regions. The United States is experiencing an event such as this is
not El Nino related as many nations, including China, are experiencing
greater moisture showing up in storm systems and deluging areas.
(If I may note from a historical perspective, this same phenomena was
observed in the 1870 to 1890 period on the Great Plains with super cells
dropping hail drifts across the area.)
As the sun's bandwidth returned to only radiant heat, another strange
phenomena came upon the plains in the 1900 to 1930 period of being wet,
but no storms were found. This included no thunderstorms much like
California experienced for a generation. It was only during the
combination of radiant and burst heating on other frequencies during the
30's which created the dust bowl that a dry radiant heating cycle
occurred void of the increased water vapor which is occurring now.
For your ocean research, this means an eon scale which has seen great
deviations in what is not considered normal by what weather or solar
heating is today or what science assumes is normal.
For example in the eon epic, earth was covered in what would not be a
weather pattern, but by a global transpiration pattern of universal heat
and warmth of very little fluctuations in temperatures no matter the
locality on the planet.
The earth plant structure, ocean plant structure and atmosphere all
interacted like a lung which wept in breathing in vapor and exhaling
mists to sustain life.
At a breakpoint, this cycle was exposed to a cooling of the upper
atmosphere due to solar fluctuations of radiant and thermal heat of
various bandwidths, caused the vapors to ascend and "weather" was born
as we know it today. It is a complicated scenario, but when this
happened vast quantities of water caught in the atmosphere cooled and
once the cooling started it rained and did not stop for what would be
considered an epic amount of time.
The cooling brought about the seasonal cycles and vast quantities of ice
and snow in glaciers to try and retain this moisture now exhaled from
the skies.
As a historic note, America has a record of the effects of this
horrendous cycle in the Greenland ice sheets showing winds not
understood casting up dust clouds off the continent in the 200 mph
category it is believed. The deluge carved out the Grand Canyon as much
as the release of glacial lake damns which created wonders that took not
eons, but hours to form.
Into this is your ocean research, for when the atmosphere was reacting
to the solar heat cycle an event occurred which forever changed the
cycle of precipitation on earth. In this, the ocean actually transformed
not from a reservoir only, but to the "lungs and heart of earth. By
this, I mean to explain the oceans started a vast and minute symbiotic
relation to sustain life on the planet.
The oceans breathe and exhale gases which drive weather systems, but
absorb heat and moderate temperature over a vast scale of temperatures
from ice age to moderating the planet from over heating in it's excess
moisture acting like an air conditioner and reflective system.
This is where you must relate the CO2 in the system as the ocean has
built in mechanisms on the minute scale to deal with massive releases of
elements or combinations of elements. For example when a meteor
literally rips apart the fabric of life, it is the ocean which in
natural balance which absorbs the excess. Examples in regulation are the
White Cliffs of Dover in which minute ocean life responding to an
environmental over supply turned it into a calcium life deposit to
regulate the carbon excess.
This system is by physical design meant to deal with and respond exactly
like a human body generates sweat to cool or stores moisture in the cold
when solar heating ebbs and flows on a stellar scale.
What people are ignorantly stating as a problem in glacial melting would
be a catastrophic problem if that moisture was not melting. That ice was
deposited in mass as a response to low solar heat activity in which the
atmosphere thinned so more heat would be absorbed to keep life viable
here. Right now that moisture is releasing in response to solar wave
lengths to regulate the temperature in moderating it. In essence, the
earth is sweating now like a human body does which is not a disaster,
but a normal function.
The ocean you study right now is working out the balance of CO2 as much
as plants are in transpiration response. The entire mechanism of earth
works and overcomes mankind, volcanoes, meteors and the sun. (The sun
though must behave at acceptable levels, but that is another physics
principle of galactic frequency correlation which is not related to this
discussion.)
The ocean is not as you state in on your web page something which
impacts upon the earth no more than you would state your exhaling
impacts on your body. It is a simple function made too complex by
individuals equating the house is on fire. The earth is not a house. It
is a living regulatory system which is almost a life form and earth is
not a house to flee nor is global warming a danger as human footprints
are designed into the oceanic system.
There are right now trillions of minute organism converting that CO2
into carbon fixed residue like calcium in shells as it is seen as the
nectar of life to these life forms. No one will see the result of the
next White Cliffs unless they have a life cycle greater than earth as
this all takes more than a human life cycle.
I have sincerely shared this with you Professor McKinley with all due
respect in attempting to expand your vistas of Wisdom beyond trying to
understand the dynamics of something which seems so vast, but to simply
marvel and enjoy for you and your students how something so complex and
intricate as a snail shell can at the same time be simple and cumbersome
as mile thick slabs of fossil stone.
Your Lake Superior in this is but a flat slough affecting the acre of
land it occupies in early spring creating an ecosystem for migrating
ducks to feed as they move onto the vast liquid arteries of Ontario
province connecting to the Hudson and the reservoir ocean beyond.
Superior has not the resource to effect beyond precipitation on a local
pond scale as it does not have the generating infrastructure imprint of
an ocean.
It may be the big lake whose tempest is unforgiving to mere mortals, but
fresh water does not contain the "soup" or "pollution" of life in
producing a response earth would note. It is a beautiful lake, but like
you Professor in your life, Superior is just a human not capable to
effect more than the space they occupy.
May your days be full of discovery and the delight in the Truth of the
wonder of Newton's science proving what the eye has seen all along is
the reality of all things working together for those who love the Truth.
