Saturday, September 25, 2010
The Chicken or the Egg
There is a definite difference between "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" to the Big Bang Theory. One is a definitive statement and the other is unproven as that is what a theory is.
Yet one can not find any of these physicists who will admit to it being unproven, and just how many holes are in this stupid, idiotic "wacko science" as goofy as the global warming scam.
I heard a physicist on Coast to Coast mention this recently in the Big Bang while discounting other ideas callers were speaking of and my mind started contemplating in the Holy Ghost just how ludicrous BBT is.
For starters, one has the verbiage of something gigantic and something explosive. That is what a bang is. It is the blowing apart of assembled matter.
Now in physical terms, something certainly had to have joined this one big blob of matter together. It certainly was not Gorilla Glue now was it.
Science disregards all this in Stevie Hawking Godless terms, as something had to hold that blob together and force it to compress enough for it to explode. That would mean gravity and the only things which explode in atomic structure as this is matter are atoms, as in nuclear type explosions like the sun.
So in that scientific basis, the question is this which science covers up as it lies to the world is, if something that big had that much gravity to implode in on itself to go bang in forcing the distribution of matter into the universe...........then why like our sun did not this original blob of matter, simply gravitate back toward itself immediately in a Big Implosion, creating a perpetual process as the gravitational weight would always suck in all matter due to the immenseness of the original field?
Perhaps science might say that the universe is a void, like the Bible says, or a vacuum as they play with, so the force of the bang so propelled the matter, that nothing could come back to Ground Zero.
Slight problem with that is, when the universe is a void, that means no gravity or anything which would cause matter to naturally gravitate toward itself...........so how did all these galaxies and solar systems start gravitating toward each other, when....well the original Ground Zero did not have the gravity to draw in that matter which was still thousands of miles in the blob sphere?
The problem compounds as we see stars explode in big bangs and they are called nebulas on the same atomic principle of contracting matter in weight in gravitational fields and bangs occurring, and yet the universe looks nothing like one big nebula which actually is not in perpetual expansion like the universe.
The avalanche starts to build in if you were to fire a bullet from a space station, that bullet without gravitational fields (that is what science says space is and when nothing was there already to influence galaxies) this blob of lead would forever fly in a straight line without rotation.
If you shot a shotgun shell with all those pellets off the station, they too in a void would fly forever in a straight line, and those pellets would not start fusing into planets, nor would they start orbiting around each other, nor would they ever start making miniature spiral galaxies.
So the basis is the Big Bang ejected matter into a void, and science would prove that this matter would never congregate on itself in orbits due to straight line physical dynamics, as there is no air, gravity or anything in a void to start any movement to interfere with a straight line ejection, and yet all of this matter by miracle as science does not explain it, started gathering into galaxies, solar systems, suns, planets and all this atomic waste which never had any life force in it previously, by miracle just happened to produce micro life forms to evolve.
Lot's of miracles in that quantum leap of silence by science they are asking people to have faith in without a God..............while science just shrugs and expects people to believe something which is impossible turned possible millions of times over when it could not.
Ever seen an asteroid? They are quite rough and non pleasing to the eye. That is though what Big Bang matter would look like, and yet the majority of matter due to rotational spin has rounded or spiral features which are softened.
Asteroids which are products of collisions and matter ejected on trajectories are what Big Bang material should be. Yet even lunar craters show a pretty liquid roundness to them as the ragged takes on the roundness which is the constant feature showing up time and again.
The entire universe according to science should look like asteroids, it should all be on a straight trajectory, and yet the majority of matter is not.
From an explosive standpoint, the universe literally should be a halo as all this matter radiated out from a central point at the same time, and yet nothing could be further from that Big Bang theory. Instead there is a symmetry in distribution as if the galaxies were either placed there or somehow Little Bangs were ejecting matter at different times.
This could go on in exposing the depths of how ludicrous physicists and science are for even mentioning the Big Bang, but the point is proven is absolutely none of what science is speaking about follows basic God given laws of the universe.
It becomes a matter then of science delving deeper into string theories.........ooooppss there is that theory again science clings to, and other nonsense, when those simple Words in the Bible fit exactly what one can see plainly.
There was a void with nothing in it, and from nothing "someone" created something out of nothing and placed this matter there.
That matter was incapable of regeneration and to the point life, until "someone" brooded over it and imparted their attribute of life into that matter, which started a dynamic of changing lifelessness to life, and a counter force of chaos or death into regeneration and order.
Let there be is the perfect scientific calculation as these things appear as much as a child from a mother's unaborticide womb as a star birthed in the cosmic dust naturally forming in that same regenerative life force.
The Big Bang theory is unproven and as idiotic as my relative's Evolution theory in missing links. The links are missing, because they never existed.
Physics proves the Big Bang could never have happened, yet this Godless ilk continue to cling to such stupidity and no one bothers to challenge them on basic Newtonian principles in proving this class of educated idiots wrong.
Well not it has, so here am I moving on.
Who you going to believe God Who put it in Word and proves it in plain sight or scientists who can not even get the fundamental science right to match their lies?
agtG