In my love of history, I despise historians as very few, as in 2 I have met, are genuine, while the rest are Obama voters, who make up things to blame Americans and always take the part of America's enemies.
In searching for something important to me alone, I have been perusing the archives of the Sioux Uprising in 1862. In that, a merchant named Myrick has been smeared from time immemorial by a missionary family..........who based their claims on the recollections of an old man who was suffering from dementia.
This has gotten so bad that one of these serial historians in Dee Brown of the Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee nonsense for Obama bucks, has ranted about Andrew Myrick as the cause of the 1862 Uprising as this group says Myrick told the Indians "they could eat grass".
The problem is the missionary who related this story, was not even in Minnesota when he said this happened, but was in Ohio.
Historians though care little about any of this when it comes to hating Americans or merchants. The inflamed story is all that matters in making excuses for Indians on rampage, just like we hear the same excuses for Muslim terrorists.
The fact is that of the Sioux, the farming Indians in the lower reservation had bumper crops that year so were not going to be eating grass. The fact is that the Little Crow terrorists who were the Uprising were not starving enough that they could not resort to days of murder as they were quite vital.
These same Sioux villages had so much strength they fled hundreds of miles to North Dakota.
The reality is Andrew Myrick as a sutler or trader did have a meeting with the Sioux in June which is two months before the terror events, and no mention is made of any missionary.
What Andrew Myrick told these Indians who were begging, as all Indians begged for chuck non stop, is that you will come to me to beg for meat and flour....and I will not let you have a thing. You and your wives and your children MAY starve, or eat grass or your own filth."
Now before you Dee Brown frown in Myrick sounding evil, put yourself in Myrick's position as Obama lets in a few thousand Mexicans and they show up at your door demanding food.
Is this your responsibility to feed foreigners?
What about if you know these Mexicans have been here for a year, and were given seeds to plant, and instead they spent their spring and summer loafing around in their houses. Would you in knowing winter was coming at a June meeting, lecture these Mexicans to the fact that they either get things planted, prepare to hand over some of their welfare money for food to you, as you were not in this world to be a welfare state to 6000 Mexicans who Obama promised to feed and clothe?
Things change in perspective when reality sets in. Try showing up at Dee Brown's house demanding food as Obama has not given you a job, or Obama is late with the unemployment. Is Dee Brown going to be a beasty liberal then in calling the police on you or is she going to be handing over her credit cards to you so you can go home and take a nap all winter on your couch?
That is the problem with Obama historians in they are so warped they can not see reality, nor can they ever comprehend that maybe Confederate provocateurs were all through the border tribes trying to get them to revolt, and maybe these Sioux who wanted to steal, rape and murder, liked the idea of being carte blanche to this, as a Union loss would mean they would get all of Minnesota back and their terrorism would be viewed by Jeff Davis as "an act of war".
Perhaps the Sioux would be now heralded in Confederate schools as being the western front which turned the war against Lincoln, and the Indians would not be skewing this on greedy traders, but on how the Sioux terrorists aided the Confederates.
When liberal historians write anything, they can not help but wrap it all up in their bias and prejudice in not giving a damn about facts. It is how Michael Beschloss on Don Imus chatters about Obama having off the wall IQ numbers and when called on it, Beschloss can not back it up as he just lied about it as he loves Obama.
It is why Bill Clinton gets pages in history and Republican Presidents like Nixon only get a Watergate chant.
All of this matters because these liberals are using Indians via the Obama regime to steal elections in America. Joe Brown in Alaska just had his win stolen from him. Norm Coleman had his win stolen from him by Al Franken Indians. Tim Johnson in South Dakota is in office due to Sioux stuffing ballot boxes.
This Indian problem is not going to stop until this is addressed as this blog has exclusively warned in Obama handing out nation status to Indians, that the money train is not just going to flow through reservations, but Americans are going to have these quasi reservation states turn into Gaza or Chechnya, and then what the hell is America going to do when the Sioux invite the Chinese PLA to set up military bases in South Dakota with nuclear missiles?
Andrew Myrick was a grocery store and like your grocery store, he is not responsible to hand out free turkeys and microwave dinners to you, just because you do not have a job.
If you decide to start shooting people, raping women, and stealing what they have because you do not have a job, Eric Holder is going to bring the entire Naps Napolitano federal police on you.
So if you are a criminal for doing what Indians did, so are the Indians, and if you are not responsible for Mexicans Obama let into your city, then Andrew Myrick was not responsible for Indians on Uncle Sam's reservations.
It all matters and the more these fraud liberals get away with spreading lies..........the more we will hear how beautiful that horse face Muchelle Obama is.
The facts matter.
agtG
