I do a great deal of historical research for various reasons, so when I come across the land of Al Franken, and their pomposity in somehow Minnesotans are more Obama than the rest of us lice pickers, I pause in the reality of things so unAmerican, that I just do not know what to do with it.
During the Civil War the Sioux Indians, you know those Lakota, Nakota, Dakota bury me at Wounded Knee, Custer died for your sins, racists, revolted probably due to Confederate overtures other tribes rejected in 1862 and literally nailed people to the walls of their homes, carved on them, kidnapped them, raped them and murdered them in thee most brutal of ways.
I have always exclusively maintained it was these Minnesota Sioux who were the heinous butchering part of the Little Big Horn, as the summer of 1876 they came west to Montana, raised hell, and then skulked back to Minnesota, as Custer recorded acres of Wikiups, which he thought were shelters for dogs, but these were eastern Sioux going west all spring from the "safety of Minnesota".
There are still numerous wild Sioux in the area of the Dakotas today and if you wander too close to areas you should not, you will find racism and disappear with only a skill cap in a road culvert being your grave.
It is in being around Indians my life that I know what they are and have no fantasy about them. When subdued they are smiling racists like Muchelle Obama, and when turned loose they chop you up in little pieces and enjoy it.
Nothing has really changed since 1862 in Minnesota. It is the same Al Franken bribes, the same forked tongues, the same fiengned civilization and the same murder is just lurking there if the opportunity presents itself.
America you have no idea if things melt down just what kind of Indian trouble you are going to have as these communists have been indoctrinated with a Hollywood grudge for two generations now and they are going to bite you given the Obama opportunity.
I'm just surprised Red Lake doesn't have Chicom nuclear missiles stationed there to fire at Minneapolis.
So in knowing Indians in Minnesota of Al Franken vintage stealing elections, I was reading the saga of the Minnesotans who survived and died in 1862 during the uprising.
It makes me ponder if it is murder if an Indian is shooting a Minnesotan who knowing their is a massacre happening lets it happen?
The story of Jonathan Earle is sort of Minnesotan happening repeatedly.
It starts out he moves to Minnesota and settles by the Sioux. The Sioux show up in war paint talking about war with the Chippewas.
Earle isn't phased by this, nor is bothered when one big Indian tries to take his gun down from the wall, but Earle does stop him.
Meanwhile Earle sends the kids out to get the horses, which the boys report the Indians are rustling animals for the "war".
Earle gets the boys to take his 7 horses to the fort until war fever dies down. As the boys go, they meet a messenger reporting a massacre has taken place. They flee home and report to neighbors of the Indian danger.
About 28 Minnesotans gather at Earle's home and they all decide to go to Fort Ridgely.
On the way, 4 bucks show up and tell them they are going to murder them. When they ask the Indians why, they Indians change their minds and decide just to rob them of their goods and horses, which these Minnesotans hand over.
This includes a buggy with a sick woman in it lying down, so the men apparently have to pull the thing themselves.
About this time I'm trying to figure out in Second Ammendment America, just what in the hell is going on here in where are the guns for these Minnesotans?
As the story unfolds, I find out the two Earle boys are armed, and so is Earle.
OK so we have 28 Americans and only four Indians who are either armed or not, and this Earle just with all these other adults hand everything over to these terrorists.
It becomes worse now as around 20 Indians are showing up, and the fine upstanding Minnesotans all abandon the sick woman and her children. This gets better as Earle announces he is fleeing and takes off, and the Indians start shooting to which a Mr. Hendersen who is the sick woman's husband after he has his fingers shot off, basically becomes Speedy Gonzales and blows past Earle like the roadrunner in abandoning his wife and children who the Indians kidnap.
Earle has his wife and daughters captured, and he literally sends one little girl back to the Indians who wants to go with him, because he tells her the Indians will not "hurt her" he thinks.
What happens next is apparently Minnesotan as for reasons I can not figure out, Earle is in the Indian chase on the prairie and when he reaches a little hiding place he takes off his pantaloons and boots, as now he announces he can run better.
This apparently works out quite well as he catches up to his teenage son and tells him to "Shoot his gun (which is only loaded with gravel), then drop it and run", like Earle had done.
Ok at this point people are dead, people are kidnapped, and Earle has for the first time fired his gun and actually killed one Indian, as he throws down his rifle and runs.
So, we got an Indian massacre going on, and no one brings along extra powder or shot, but they remember to take their pants off so they can run faster as their women folk are taken off to be raped.
It becomes even more Minnesotan at this point, as Earle's son follows his father's advice, drops to the ground, and fires his gravel at the Indians, to which the Indians shoot him, then ride up and shoot him a few more times, get off and scalp the boy, and Earle's expression is, "What a fine brave boy".
No compunction to take the kids gun and sell out hard saving the boy's life, no paternal feelings to die with his brave son..........nope just watching your kid butchered as you can't stop running in Minnesota.
Earle complains as his running reaches safety in having taken his boots and pants off the prairie grass has cut his legs and gnawed off the ends of his toes.
The problem with this is Jonathan Earle is not the Minnesota exception. You can read in almost every account of the stupidty of these people. Sometimes an Indian shoots a friend, then drives a knife into the guy reporting it, and the guy asks the Indians what happened. The scene then is the knifed guy trying to load his guns, but for some reason doesn't get it done, so he breaks the guns, gets shot in the groin, puts his dogs on the Indians and makes his mistake as the Indians kill the dogs.
Two wives like Hendersen literally leave their wounded husbands to the Indians if they return to save their lives..........worse yet, a mother in law arrives whose husband and son were murdered, yokes the oxen, loads the wounded men in a sled and rescues them.
That mother in law was the exception as most of these Minnesotans were like that movie Fargo, doncha know.
So when Indians shoot Minnesotans is it really murder when these sheep just stand around bleating and allow it to happen?
This is why no one has in America ever made a movie about this, or taught this in American schools when America still had schools, as every single story in this Minnesota uprising was absolutely unAmerican, in being not only stupid, but absolute cowardice.
This was like the first planes in 9 11 with people getting their throats cut.......the problem is that on Flight 93 Americans fought back within hours, but Minnesotans days later were still being slaughtered and never did fight back.
It is beyond odd, as Col. Sibley raised volunteers who fought well, but for some reason these Al Franken voters in the Minnesota River Valley, who had guns, just were sheep...........and mind you the Civil War was going on, so wasn't someone like little George Custer marching in drills with the adults as Michigan did?
Maybe that is why Abraham Lincoln commuted so many of these Sioux terrorist convictions from being hung, because the nation thought that you could hang Indians for raping women and children while nailing them to the walls, but how can you hang Indians for shooting men who are armed and running away abandoning those women and children?
All of this so contrary to John Wayne mystique and Valley Forge, New Orleans, Cold Harbor, the Alamo, the Little Big Horn, the Bulge to Kuwait. No wonder terrorists flock to Minnesota and no wonder Minnesota elects Keith Ellison and Al Franken, because their heritage is absolutely culls and ilk filled cowardice and dumb as posts.
No wonder Minnesota thinks B. Hussein Obama was a good idea. They import terrorists, cuddle with Marxism and the cowards who survived the 1862 Minnesota Massacre by running away bred an entire Al Franken voting block.
Is it really murder when a coward flees their family to rapine, does not care enough to fight for their own life and orders children to die for them?
Lincoln thought not.
I'm certain though that Minnesota is proud of this..........but only a Minnesotan would know why.
agtG
Land of 10,000 Flakes
