Ignorance is not a blissful state upon the whore penninsula of Andrew Berwick, the Viking. Actually one can learn more about the decay of balanced reasoning in America than the simple logic of Mr. Berwick as I have witnessed a puzzling pattern of some terming the Viking a madman and others in parrot to Krauthammer's analogy of Obama transferred the title narcissist to the Norwegian.
I will to profile Mr. Berwick as I have a gut instinct on him, that before this generation expires, he is going to have a coin minted for him in being toasted in many enclaves as "the leader of the resistance who fired the first shot".
As I have stated, there is a coming Eurasian World War IV coming. The Bible predicts one. Albert Pike of the Illuminati stated the order would bring one about to pit Christianity against Islam and the Catholic oracles of Slavic Europe all foretell of this coming saga.
So incinerate Paris. Link Russia, China and the Islamic billion in an invasion of Europe in which Prague is ploughed and Norwegian bodies scatter the fields like cabbages, and the common thought now judging Andrew Berwick is going to be a different model as the liberal New York horde after 9 11 was screaming for blood once butchered.
That aside, I have seen people who focused on Andrew Berwick spent time with two whores before his saga was initiated. The silliness of the condemnation of this without examination is typical of the brainwashing of reaction instead of thinking which takes place in the public forum.
I have actually read 2083 and my mind was not wandering on other subjects as this is one of the many vocations I pursue or which pursue me in profiling humans, as much as tracking dangerous animals.
For some reason, I demand that all creatures must behave in their genus like a domino always stacks the same, but there are always exceptions and so many Spiritual or spiritual influences which whisper to the inner core that the survival instinct preserves the genus.
The last word Andrew Berwick spoke was a photo of his Mother and I will presume his Sister in a very attractive family. Mr. Berwick has an apparent wound on his head, and that photo was chosen to reveal his internal wounds and the people he was carrying out this act for.
A narcissist does not make their final statement focused upon others. A narcissist does not contemplate isolating themselves from those they love, and then finding the dichotomy that protecting them by doing it, cuts him off from the people he loves. A narcissist does not invest two years of their lives writing a book, initiating a well thought out plan and ending their liberty with only one published book and no following tributes to them.
Andrew Berwick is not a narcissist, is not mad, is not a womanizer who thinks women are only good for sex and is not a coward, as he logically assimilated ways in dealing with his fear he faced.
I do not put this Viking on a pedistal, but it must be analyzed correctly in who Andrew Berwick is, because if it is allowed to smear him in these moronic Obama slanders like "Obama is a moron who does not know what he is about", when Obama coldly knows exactly what his orders are accomplishing, then one can never deal with the situation as one is not dealing with the reality of the individual, but lazy prejudice and bias as the person doing the judging is not capable of analytical processes.
To focus on the reported whores is the case in point, as the Viking is most interesting in this, as unlike the Muslim terrorists who could not get women and had to pay for strippers and whores, Andrew Berwick could get women, but chose to distance himself from women.
He makes that point in one local girl was checking him out, but Berwick is of a caste system in Eurasians which he brushes it off to his superiority of being a highlander..........but if he thought women were only good for sex, he would have used this woman and dumped her.
He would not do this, as that was not in his moral code to use women.
Andrew Berwick chose prostitutes for the simple reason, he was acting responsible in not wanting to fall into the trap of having emotional ties to someone, who might cause him to reassess his Knight's plan.
Women were his weakness and he knew that a woman's love would cause him to deflect from the plan, but he would not allow that to happen in the least.........AS HE LOVED THE WOMEN IN HIS FAMILY MORE and would not betray them.
Andrew Berwick in profile might appear to the uninformed a complicated soul, but in reality he is foremost driven by chivalry.
Paying for whores to keep intimacy non existant is what a warrior does as they know by instinct the last thing that laser event needs is thoughts of "What would my beloved think now" or "Will I survive this for her".
This Viking was no coward in he wrote of knowing his bomb mixing might blow his arms off, so he kept his Glock by him, so he could use his toe to pull the trigger.
Undercover Police on his farm, he went to meet them unarmed. The door to the barn blown open by the wind, and he presumed by a police search, he went to source with his fog lights on and waited 20 minutes sitting there for SWAT to attack him.
For the matter of attacking children on an island, one could state that as liberals are never armed by choice, he was never going to find a fight to face, but even in that, his surrender to police was about not harming the "knights" he saw protecting Norway as he could not be certain they were not Conservatives.
Ask yourself the following in Mohammed of Islam beheaded hundreds of people.
King David of Judaism measured a line and slaughtered all on that line.
Montezuma of the Aztecs ritual slaughtered thousands in ritual sacrifice.
The question is as these are revered.............and dare I point out Mark Levin is cheering Barack Obama for his murder of Sheik bin Laden and over 40% of Americans are still giving full support to Mr. Obama after he slaughtered the innocent grandchildren of Muomar Khadaffi......why is Andrew Brevick called a madman to a womanizer, when all of the above have engaged in even greater extremes of behavior and they are held as examples people are to emulate?
What is the difference between the Obama SEALS mass murdering Muslims in bin Laden's home, their being unarmed in front of their children and what Andrew Berwick did?
Well, they were terrorists some clapper like Mark Levin would point out, but then are not liberals the ones who imported these Muslim slaves to offset Conservative Christian voters, and were not liberal the one educating these Muslims in how to be terrorists, and are not liberals the ones murdering children in the womb and telling sodomites to go commit suicide by sex?
Ask the question in why is it evil when Andrew Berwick slaughters under 100 people and it is good when Barack Obama slaughers thousands in Libya?
Is Obama doing this for oil the reason it is justifed homicide and the reason Berwick doing it for traditional Norway the reason making it unjustified?
Do you think if Andrew Berwick had gone in to a Norwegian military base or a gun club and shot a hundred right wing people if the socialist leader of Norway would be as upset?
People are deducing the answer of Andrew Berwick is wrong as they are not questioning why they allow the same actions to be deemed right when the person is backed by a United States nuclear arsenal in Mr. Obama.
Why is a British subject from whore island celebrated while a Norwegian Viking from whore peninsula comdemned for the very same acts?
Why is there silent affirmation for Andrew Berwick on the right and the left and no one is pointing this out in public, and instead, all there are posted are descriptions of him which are off the mark.
agtG
