Wednesday, February 8, 2017

A Matter of Intent

http://www.toledoblade.com/image/2017/02/07/x600_q65/Trump-Travel-Ban-9th-Circuit.jpg

As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.


Do you remember just a few months ago when FBI Director James Comey did not have charges filed on crooked Hillary Clinton, when he told everyone that it was not Hillary Clinton breaking the law, but if she had INTENT on breaking the law as an excuse for her crimes.



Did Hillary Clinton intend to break the law? - YouTube

Did Hillary Clinton intend to break the law? ... Using Hillary Clinton Defense James Comey Left ... Did Hillary Clinton Break with Her ...

Yes intent has NOTHING to do with your getting a speeding ticket, as the cop gives you one whether you intended to speed or not, but with Hillary Clinton it means innocence according to James Comey.

Yet intent appeared again in the communist 9th circuit court hearing the Trump Travel Ban, as the guilt of President Trump is his "intent", and not that fact that the President has FULL LEGAL AUTHORITY to ban any foreigner which the President intends.


Appeals court hearing on Trump travel ban - live blog - CBS News

... travel ban, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral ... intent evidence," given Mr. Trump's past ... Trump had initially asked ...
multimedia.cbs.com/news/appeals-court-travel-ban-trum


See the President could be someone who hates Muslims and burns them with cigs the way Sean Penn does Ann Coulter dolls, and it would not make one bit of difference as the reason the President issued the travel ban has nothing to do with his intent, whether good or bad. It has to do with President Trump has full authority to issue that ban, and President Trump has that complete authority.

So we have liberals again with intent. Intent gets Hillary Clinton off on criminal charges, and intent produces findings for liberals against President Donald Trump who has full legal authority to do everything he has done.


One more thing, that puss General Kelly, instead of going to Congress and apologizing for not explaining to them about this travel ban, the Director should have stated, "Since Presidents have been issuing travel bans forever, the Administration did not deem it necessary to alert Congress to THEE EXACT BANS CONGRESS was passing just a few years ago."


A matter of intent, another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.



agtG