As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I was listening to the elite of the gun community in Tom Gresham of Gun Talk concerning the Las Vegas Shooting, and pondered his assessment that there were over 100 experts investigating the shooting and there was no need to watch videos online claiming multiple shooters, because these experts would find the truth and tell us.
When Mr. Gresham stated that, my thought was, "Ok the people who can not find Hillary Clinton is a crook, the people who wanted to pay $50,000 for a fake Pissgate file, the people who covered up the murder of LaVoy Finicum. the people who provided explosives to the attackers at Oklahoma City, the people who set up Hutatree, the people who did the Warren Commission Report on JFK, the people who are investigating Donald Trump over Russia which did not happen, and we are supposed to trust that the Truth is going to come from them concerning Las Vegas?"
See when you have the insider line, the insider salaries, and the insider friends, you tend to produce a narrative which backs your benefactors. Yet in the same program Mr. Gresham was repeating the lie of Stephen Paddock trying to blow up the concert with jet fuel, which was spun by CNN, and as Mr. Gresham noted, "Well that was A type jet fuel and it would not blow up any way".
In this, there are many narratives in the Las Vegas shooting and it continues to grow, but I am moved to examine something which was first noted here, and has been taken up by investigative reporter, Yiochi Shimatsu. It deals with Paddock being a gun runner for the government, and that he was executed early, because he would not fire into the crowd.
So the jihadists offered him one last test of faith before his “martyrdom”. At every terror site, at least one dead martyr must be left behind for the sake of the lone gunman myth, which benefits both the political class to appease public anger and also the terrorists trying to conserve manpower for their next strike. Paddock was more useful as a fall guy than as a fighter.
To flush out informers, crime groups will often order a new member to murder an undercover police informant or a friend in a rival gang, as depicted in the Johnny Depp movie “Donnie Brasco”. In real life and in the movie, Joe Pistone aka Brasco was shrewd enough not to flinch and shot his pal Tony Mirra, to the satisfaction of the Bonnano mob, and no further questions were asked of the rookie who had earned their trust as an unquestioning obedient henchman.
During the meeting to transfer the traceable guns to the ISIS men in his 32nd floor room, his client(s) would order him to start shooting at the concert-goers below as a test of faith. Caught totally off-guard by this demand to kill fellow Americans, Paddock would have balked. Instead of giving a straight answer, he probably requested a moment of prayer in the bathroom to think it over, allowing him to message his FBI support team.
Now for a Lame Cherry narrative which might be closer to the facts.
What if Paddock was indeed someone who was in the employ of the FBI. There are definite hints that the Filipino maul, was as the FBI cleared her immediately which is unheard of. There is another interesting report on Paddock's plane being connected to a paramilitary front company which is employed by the government.
In that same area of Virginia, starting in 2006, one Stephen C. Paddock (the Las Vegas suspect’s middle name is Craig), who was a resident of Henderson, Texas, and Mesquite, Nevada, based his Cirrus SR20, tail number N5343M, at Chantilly airfield. But then, just months after the Parisi deaths, he relocated the home field of that single-engine propeller plane 22 miles away to an airstrip at Roanoke.
Parked at Roanoke for the next three years, the same-model Cirrus with identical tail number N5343M was registered as belonging to Volant LLC, which conducts top-secret assignments in intelligence and defense operations, something like the Mission Impossible team. Three weeks prior to the Vegas massacre, however, the Cirrus made its first recent flight, presumably by Paddock or another Agency pilot to deliver his consignment of guns to Las Vegas.
Thanks to a vigilant citizen online by name of Mike, that defense contractor is now in the spotlight. The limited liability company describes its team of experts as follows: “A Volant Associate proudly serves the needs of the nation’s Intelligence and Defense Community. Each associate matches a specific and rigorous profile and is the absolute best of his or her breed: a dedicated, driven, educated, broadly experienced leader who holds, at a minimum, an active Top Secret SCI clearance”
So there are indications by proof of the clearing of the maul and other anecdotal evidence that Paddock was well known on the FBI radar.
What if the cameras which we have been told or were interpreted by Las Vegas PD to warn Paddock of their approach, were instead surveillance cameras to record a gun deal, for prosecution.
All of these cameras and evidence, and no one has released any of that footage, which should have shown Paddock stalking around the hotel rooms firing all over the place and watching video of SWAT coming up.
Call that a Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
This is what this post is really about in conjecture though and it goes back to the first volley, which we know that Stephen Paddock was doing precise calculations on how to hit the crowd, but we know from Country Crooner Owen that he was on stage and stated all of the first shots were hitting the top of the roof of the stage and bouncing off.
We know from CNN that a few of those rounds hit the fuel tanks, and fake news spun it to blowing up the concert which was an absolute lie.
Try this scenario out then, what if Paddock was involved with the FBI. What if he was not, but had a change of heart. What if others were there as there is a definite two gun report recorded, overlaying each other. What if Stephen Paddock was deliberately firing over that crowd to not hit it in the first volley, because he was an asset of the FBI or what if he decided he could not go through with it, and his accomplices figured out he was spraying the air, and that this is them moment he was executed?
Remember this in the first police reports in how they were baffled that Paddock was dead, in they had no idea if he shot himself, they shot him or if someone else had shot him.
This is a reality now which has factual evidence to back it up. Maybe Stephen Paddock who had done all of that figuring, was figuring out how not to kill people or was figuring out how to kill people and decided against it and fired over the crowd. There is a reality in this that either Stephen Paddock was a complete moron in not understanding his own computations, or he was not firing into that crowd in the first volley deliberately, and it was then he was executed, causing the 30 second delay as the terrorists rearmed and began firing with effect.
On the above, Perry Mason, could put that same doubt into a jury's mind, as there is enough evidence now in the notepad which was stupidly exposed by the British Press, and the bullets over the crowd, to put forth the puzzling reality of how could an intelligent man with numbers, not figure out his own numbers which is not probable, or this intelligent man was making sure he was not going to hit anyone below by firing over them.
It is always the plus minus of either or, it is one of these two emerging possibilities.
Shot by a gunman in the crowd.
Vegas killer described his unusual habits in testimony...
Tight-Lipped Sheriff Faces Maddening Case...
WYNN: Either demented or sending message...
Prostitute: Shooter enjoyed violent rape fantasies...
Nuff Said
agtG
