Sunday, October 8, 2017

Who "lost" Stephen Paddock?




As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

 We know for a fact now three certainties in the Las Vegas slaughter.

1. The Filipino maul was lying about her relationship with Stephen  Paddock as  Lara Loomer reported that Paddock told a barber in August he was sending her to the Philippines, and Gateway Pundit confirmed this from another source in an elderly neighbor, who stated that the Filipino maul packed up and left the retirement community in early August.



Mrs Page also revealed how Paddock, 64, fled town after buying a new silver minivan at the start of August.
And just two weeks later she said she watched as girlfriend Marilou Danley packed her things into her car before also leaving.
Mrs Page added: “I remember at the start of August looking out of my window and seeing Stephen pull up in a brand new huge silver minivan.
“But just a few days later he left the house in it and was never seen again.
“I thought the whole situation was even weirder when two weeks later I then look out of my window again to see Marilou stuffing her car full of all her belongings.
“Over the course of three or four days it was like she was moving her entire life out of the house.
“She packed so much stuff not only was her car full, but it was also tied to the top of her car.
“After a few days of packing she too pulled out of the driveway and was never seen again.
“It was all very strange.”

This detail is extremely important, because it begs the question of exactly what did Marilou Danley do with a car stuffed full of belongings? Are they in a rental, did she ship this in 25 dollar boxes packed back to Asia, or does she have a residence someplace, as she did return to America with her lawyer to tell her story to the FBI.
One just does not stick a car in an envelope and mail it to Manila either.

Fully recall that this is a woman who took 9 cruises with Paddock in a short period of time. These were not for gambling nor because they enjoyed the food.

The second lie we are certain of now:

2. The FBI has been covering something up in this investigation from the start, as it was reported again by Lara Loomer that a bellhop had a gag order placed on them, as they handled Paddock's luggage.

Oct 6
Laura Loomer Retweeted Aldo Raine
I can confirm. A source told me has issued a gag order on at least one bell hop employee who had contact w/ shooter's bags

Remember in this before the bodies were even cold, law enforcement had cleared the maul of all guilt. It was at this point this blog stated this woman in no way could be cleared, considering what she had been involved with.
Thee only way she could have been cleared this quickly is Las Vegas police, in investigating made BOLA inquiries, and the FBI in Las Vegas knew who this woman was, and immediately vouched for her.

This opens up thee entire boulevard of exclusives which this blog posted first in it appeared that Stephen Paddock was laundering money for Asian sources in casinos. The amount of firearms which were involved indicated these were straw walkers, or guns purchased for others which is illegal. This many military weapons purchased by someone who had been out of the United States at least 20 times in the past year, would have set off all Homeland flags.
According to reports, Homeland has taken over the investigation in Las Vegas, as the FBI continues to ridicule the local Sheriff.

The last lie confirmed in this is that no one knew of Stephen Paddock.

3. Stephen Paddock was off the radar for 10 years and no one knew of his movements.

Former Trump campaign official James Brower fired off two tweets Thursday evening regarding the Las Vegas shooter Sephen Paddock claiming “There is a video, this video will prove the motive. He had a secret digital profile that was uncovered in the last 24 hours.” 
Brower then tweeted “Motive will be pretty shocking, I won’t say much but it will definitely change a lot of things going forward.” 
While Brower did not reveal the motive over Twitter, the former Massachusetts Trump campaign official who accurately divulged that Paul Manafort was being wiretapped before it became public told Infowars “I’m being told the video basically speaks about a network, they wouldn’t tell me directly if it was ISIS but they threw little hints that it was,” adding “The reason the video more than likely is never released is because they believe it will trigger the “cells” he speaks of.”

The Lame Cherry takes you back to Charlottesville which had FBI trolls involved, and as that activates your memory banks, go back further to Bill Clinton, and the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, where federal authorities had TOW missiles stored by a daycare which detonated, and Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, were convicted of, but Terry Nichols is still alive in federal prison, because his attorney handed over bomb making equipment which had the fingerprints of FBI moles who provided the devices to Nichols.
Still not making any connection? Nichols had traveled to the Philippines for training with the Muhajadeen, or al  Qaeda or the present day ISIS. Mr. Paddock and the maul are traveling to the Mideast, Europe and she is in the Philippines.
Ms. Maul being cleared indicates she was known to the FBI, so therefore Stephen Paddock was known.

Now for the assessment, people who lie to the FBI and law enforcement end up in prison on felony charges, and not turned loose after FBI interviews. The FBI has been clamping down on information flow and smearing the local police who are asking questions, because none of this make sense.

Remember the Murrah bombing, in the regime started impeding information flow, people started ending up dead, and it all went away, as the cover up, like in Charlottesville, like with LaVoy Finicum's murder, the police state had been involved in some level in tracking those involved and associating with them, as on 9 11, at which point Jamie Gorelick's walls of separation lost the terrorists and 9 11 took place.

There is online speculation that Paddock was running guns for ISIS. What if all of these "internet scouting" of locations and room rentals from August on, were Paddock not for him, but for another group as a sort of bonafides in the business he was engaged in. The business being that Stephen Paddock was not Barack Hussein Obama able to bring in 300 million in terror donations to Obama's 2008 campaign in laundering counterfeit credit card donations, but Paddock was taking bags of cash from Eurasian and laundering the money for them.

Again, as Ms. Maul was cleared by the police state, that would conclude the police state knew of all of this, which would conclude why the FBI is smearing the Las Vegas police as dolts, because if it were proven that the FBI knew of Stephen Paddock, his travels, his money laundering, his weapons, and a load of Trump voters got hosed down at a concert, that might not get swept away quite so easily as 9 11 did in that cover up.
It might be a real problem for those who knew Stephen Paddock and those he was involved with in the police state if these other cells start going active and creating other events, in which perhaps other facilities as malls or schools which could do with expensive sales of scanning equipment, that the public might not in the Trump voting era fall for the propaganda and cover ups as before.

I desire each of you to think about one thing. Theresa May and the British press were pushing gun control in America over this. The American press with politicians tried, but immediately went silent. It all fell to the GOP and Mr. President to call for a bump gun regs. Now why would Hillary Clinton be running for cover in this, unless of course they were alerted to the James Bower information, in this was John McCain's ISIS terror related and that the maul was known to the FBI and this entire situation.
It simply does not look good on the Twitter to be harping about gun control when the police state is arming the terrorists to kill Trump voters.

Why have all the liberal democrats run for cover on this and why is it that Attorney General Jeff Sessions seems to have absolutely no interest in the biggest domestic terror event in American history?

That seems to indicate something relevant.




agtG





Posted by at