As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
With news that Kurt Eichenwald has been stalking a child survivor of the Parkland Shootings, with hiring a psychological profile of the child is something in a pattern of Eichenwald actions and statements which are troubling.
This is a 1,000 worse than anything Ingraham did to Hogg. Where are the media reporters demanding comment from Vanity Fair? https://t.co/LRKuC4tNhx— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) April 3, 2018
The messages slandering a teenage school shooting survivor as mentally deranged & admitting to having @KyleKashuv psychoanalyzed *in secret* were sent with a Vanity Fair LOGO at the bottom of the email.I'm trying to figure out how @VanityFair defends this behavior?
This is bad pic.twitter.com/t2AEjLi7gp
— Benny (@bennyjohnson) April 3, 2018
One of the problems with the above is Kurt Eichenwald is not even employed by Vanity Fair. His response to this new revelation is that he was unaware he was not employed by the magazine in not having worked for them for a number of years.
For those who do not know who Eichenwald is, he is the reporter who filed charges on someone for giving him a seizure in sending some gif to Eichenwald.
This has become a sort of bludgeon for Eichenwald in he now filed this post in going after another internet troll.
...so my little gmailer, I hope your crime was worth it. Already in the hands of the FBI, the Dallas DA and my lawyer who has subpoena power granted by a federal court. The last guy who did this is facing 10 years. Perhaps you'll have adjoining cells.
If one examines the above, not as a layman, but as someone familiar with courts, you might be interested in why a Federal Judge would hand over subpoena power to an attorney in Eichenwald's employ.
The answer is EVERY attorney has this evidence right. Eichenwald's attorney was not granted subpoena power as Eichenwald attempts to bring that conclusion to the unversed, as every attorney as this power.
In this case it is assumed as Eichenwald mentions Google mail, apparently IF this goes to court in charges are recommended by the FBI and charges are filed by the United States Attorney, ONLY THEN can his attorney file a subpoena in court asking Google to turn over personal information.
What Are Subpoenas Used For?
Under state and federal civil or criminal procedural laws, subpoenas offer attorneys a chance to obtain information to help prove or disprove their client's case. Criminal attorneys, for example, often use subpoenas to obtain "witness" or lay opinion testimony from a third party that may lead to someone's guilt or innocence at trial. Similarly, civil attorneys often subpoena individuals to obtain information that may help settle someone's claim. For example, an attorney representing a spouse in a child custody hearing might issue a subpoena to the other spouse to appear in court to determine joint custody arrangements.
This again is where Eichenwald mixes and matches facts to apparently intimidate others in he mixes federal courts with the Dallas DA. The Dallas DA is part of the Texas state courts not the Federal Courts, so reporting whatever Eichenwald is reporting has zero value in a Texas DA in a Federal Court. The correct person is the US Attorney.
dallasda.comThe Dallas County District Attorney is the elected, or appointed by the Texas Governor in the event of a vacancy, district attorney of Dallas County, Texas. Currently, this position is held by Faith Johnson, a Republican appointed by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, after Susan Hawk, who was elected as a Republican in 2014, resigned in
That is the pattern with Kurt Eichenwald, in he states things which sound plausible to those who are not aware of the realities, and when one begins asking questions, Vanity Fair denies Eichenwald was in their employ.
So what Eichenwald posted in reality was:
What I think is a crime, has been reported to the FBI which is a Federal Court situation, the Dallas DA which is a state court and a personal attorney who can do absolutely nothing until a federal or state prosecutor files charges based on what they deem is a real crime, and not what Kurt Eichenwald thinks is a crime.
We now have statements from Kurt Eichenwald that he somehow gained Donald Trump's personal medical information and now has engaged a medical professional to analyze a child.
The problem is, Kurt Eichenwald says numbers of things like his attorney having special powers and being employed by Vanity Fair which are not exactly true. So is what Eichenwald claims in violating people's medical privacy real or just something he is posting.
There is though in this the troubling story of Evenlyn Farkas who destroyed her career and placed herself in legal jeopardy over the Pissgate dossier, the same dossier that Eichenwald had access to by his hinting of it. Was Eichenwald the one confirming to this poor woman a fake file and did she ruin herself over what Kurt Eichenwald told her as he does exaggerate the truth.
Nuff Said
agtG
