Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Ukraine: Who was Right on Ukraine?

 






As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.


I perhaps should introduce myself as I really never have. My name is Lame Cherry and by the Grace of God, I'm a librarian of knowledge and one of my numerous vocations which, here am I, successful at, is I am a tactician.

The Lame Cherry knows all as proven once again on Ukraine. The tourist were arriving again on the Great Eurasian War in Ukraine, and as this blog explained in detail, after study of the two greatest military adventurers of the past two centuries in Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler, that even with Great Game Indian, English intrigue it is not that easy to start a world war.

There have been three leaders in King Charles. Emperor Napoleon and der Feurher who attempted to deal with Russia. All came up short, but Napoleon proved on salient point, and that was that Russia, when it had to deal with a non defeated opponent, could not win the West. The communications are too far for Moscow, Berlin or Paris. The problem of both Napoleon and Hitler was the full frontal assault on Russia. What should have been engaged instead of a frontal battle , perhaps Minsk, to draw the Russians forward, and then by pincers in the north and south, envelope Moscow so the Russians would have nowhere to retreat. Then one crushes them from the rear.

NATO is about this game but is attempting to draw Russia to Bohemia, where Napoleon shattered Russian armies to submission on other lines. The Bavarian seers view that Russia will not be stopped at Prague and will make the Rhine bleed, but that is what is taking place. Those who try to bait Russia into Ukraine or glory whore the stories alarming the public of Ukraine have no insight to Russian strategy nor to what is being baited to Russia for an invasion of Europe for their security.

Russia has bee drawn out of Belarus, but Russia under Vladimir Putin is very adept on lines of communication. Russia understands that having this spear projecting into Poland, it is a threat. If it enters Ukraine, then Russia is exposed in it's communications by the Baltic States, Poland and the Black Sea.
The Black Sea is a death trap to Russian ships once a war begins.

For this reason in lines of communication, Russia must in Ukraine take the Baltic States and Finland in the north to protect its north flank In the south it much to protect Belarus, secure the Black Sea Nations. Unless you understand battle, you do not understand the necessity of tidying up your battlefield. Violate the rules of battle and it will end up costing you in battles and you will lose. One must always anchor your opponents front and the attack their flanks and roll up their lines.

Ukraine is a quagmire of the west. It is a corrupt and untenable position like all western allies. It exports one commodity in young girls to be raped in Amsterdam and Tel Aviv for it's front as a thorn to Moscow other that that is a European radioactive dump so the French and other regime can live nuclear power pretty while contaminating eastern Europe.

The Lame Cherry told you all of this, and told you that these invasion dates are not feasible. I was quoted, not by name, in the temperatures of Ukraine are above freezing, meaning their land is mud which eats military campaigns. It does not matter if the Soviets built roads in Ukraine, because roads are kill zones for mechanized columns for artillery, air power and Javelin missiles. Columns need land to maneuver on, and until the mud is gone, Russia is left with strategic  air bombing, artillery at long range and the gemstones of paratroopers seizing Kiev. Those measures do not though stop Ukraine military inside Donbass cities. Russia needs armor and boots to secure their operations, all armies need boots on the ground and pavement to hold and win a war.

The only tactical projection which makes NATO sense is to goad Russia to attack, in order to secure it's communications. Russia must be extended as was explained above. The Bavarian seers saw assassinations in the Balkans and this brings Russia out. Russia then must move on a front from the Balkans to Finland, which is an enormous communications and logistics problem. It worse for the buffoons of NATO as those fat pedos are fodder, but it is a long front for Russia, or it's communications will be exposed, just as Charles, Napoleon and Hitler were, and this led to counter attacks. The order of battle is to keep extending Russia so it expends itself and the army will then be cut off.

This blog has mentioned the necessity of China moving into Iran, thereby it's communications can be cut off at Afghanistan and the PLA can then in part be killed. Russia must be maneuvered to attack in the period of the fall Ukraine etc... rains to make the land a weapon against Russia re supply. Blow the bridges and trains, in the rear and spray some atomic humanicide on the Russian front at the Rhine, and Russia will die as it retreats to the Volga.

I have every confidence that even in the 4 front war coming, that I could defeat Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, as much as I have every confidence that I could obliterate American projection into Eurasia, Australasia and Africa, before making America a vassal state. One simply has to know how where to fight, when to fight and the order of the fight.

Which is not bragging, but brings one to the point of this post in, the Lame Cherry was proven correct again on Ukraine.

The Russians have won the first and second rounds of the Great Eurasian War. It is cumbered by China and Iran. North Korea in that pretty little sister behind the image of the Dear Leader is holding it's end up very well in it's positioning.


His remarks come after a number of Western media publications claimed that Moscow’s armed forces were poised to stage an offensive on February 15 or 16. Notorious British tabloid The Sun reported on Tuesday that an attack, featuring a “massive missile blitz and 200,000 troops,” was due to take place in the early hours of Wednesday morning. However, once this deadline had passed, the outlet rephrased its article to state that the onslaught could come “at any time.”

Moscow has repeatedly denied that it has aggressive intentions towards its neighbor and has hit out at the frenzy whipped up in the press. On Tuesday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that “15 February 2022 will go down in history as the day Western war propaganda failed,” and that the West has been “shamed and destroyed without firing a single shot.”


Russia has weak allies, but America has more dead weight allies. Allies are the Achilles Heel of successful military operations. All leaders experience this.

Just remember that the Lame Cherry is right and you people with money should be investing the money you have here.

I have to move on from here as I listen to flat world Mormon Joel Skousen who is rigidly arrogant. He likes first strike nukes on America with no American response. He does not factor in HAARP to control nuclear fall out and he does not factor in dimensional warfare of nuclear missiles require humans to launch. Take the command and control out of the nuclear silos and no launch takes place.

That is another more complicated reality to be explained, but not here,as you needed your brain slapped that Lame Cherry was right again by God's Grace and this end times chess board you really do need someone who is right every time.


Nuff Said



agtG



agtG