One day I'm going to clean your Obama clock,
you dumb ass Irish Mic and Cracker Bill Clinton
with his JAP Ruth Bader Ginsburg are going to make me the most powerful
brother in history.
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
There has been a stunning transformation of the Supreme Court, and it is the first time in history that the Court which is normally known by the name of the Chief Justice administering it due to that position of authority, has been supplanted in Bungholer John Roberts has not been supplanted by the Catholic Amy Barrett but that the long silent Clarence Thomas has risen as the most powerful Black leader in American history in setting a new mark and direction on the Supreme Court which can be noted as traditio precidentis or Traditional Precedent.
This is not strict constructionism, but is a return to the basis of what Chief Justice John Marshall formed the Court to be, based in English Common Law, but evolved into American Colonial traditions, which flipped many English crown indictments, where in England you had to prove you were not guilty, but in America you were afforded being not guilty already and the state had to prove guilt.
What Justice Thomas bases his court on is the 5th and 14th Amendments of Due Process. I will explain in a bit. Meet you on the other side.
The Thomas opinion drew comparisons between abortion and several other political issues that have been addressed by the Supreme Court in recent years.
"In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion. "Because any substantive due process decision is "demonstrably erroneous," […] we have a duty to "correct the error" established in those precedents."
What Clarence Thomas is refocusing his court on is Due Process in 3 forms. The first is something now Congress and Dictator Biden are violating in Red Flag Laws, where an American being accused of being nuts is robbed of their Right to weapons, without hearing and then the accused must hire attorneys to get their reputation and property back. That is a violation of Due Process. Due Process is defined in if the government or anyone accuses you, you have the right to a speedy trial and to be able to face your accusers in court. This is violated by the FBI and DOJ on the Jan6ers being held in limbo and broken by torture while awaiting trials.
The second Due Process is Incorporated Rights, in the rights the Constitution give all Americans, for the most part are incorporated into each of the 50 States and Territories.
What Justice Thomas is focusing on in the abuse of Due Process in what is Substantive Due Process or seeing of rights which were not named or limited in the Constitution, such as the created "right to privacy: which turned loose a sex torrent in seeing things like contraception, pervert sex and aborticide as "rights".
The proper methodology for determining which rights should be protected under substantive due process has been hotly contested. In 1961, Justice Harlan wrote an influential dissent in Poe v. Ullman, maintaining that the project of discerning such rights “has not been reduced to any formula,” but must be left to case-by-case adjudication. In 1997, the Court suggested an alternative methodology that was more restrictive: such rights would need to be “carefully descri[bed]” and, under that description, “deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Washington v. Glucksberg (1997). However, in recognizing a right to same-sex marriage in 2015, the Court not only limited that methodology, but also positively cited the Poe dissent. Obergefell v. Hodges.
This is what Justice Thomas is calling for a review of some of the worst violations of the Constitutional framework in three major cases. The worst violations of the court in mass took place under Bungholer John Roberts. Roberts in Obamacare violated ex Judicial clauses in the case was about can a regime force people to buy things. Roberts went beyond that question and rewrote the Constitution to make Obamcare legal, by stating a lengthy screed that it was a tax, so therefore legal. Roberts would lead a Due Process violation in legalized sex perversion, due to the fact of what Clarence Thomas has stated in, the Court's rulings must find precedent in America's history and traditions.
There is not any history or tradition of aborting children. There is not a history of gun confiscation. There is not a history of sodomy. There is not a history of rationed death. This is a wise foundation from Clarence Thomas as the entire violent upheaval, which was by design, was the removal of societal progression from the Congress and laws, and placing it into the Courts where the People were not willing to be taken. Instead of as in Roe vs Wade, which again was another Court violation of the Constitution in ex Judicial and Due Process the ruling should have centered on criminality of aborticide, whether it was a crime, not where it blew up the nation that murdering babies was a right of women, as there was not a tradition of that in the least.
So the over extension of Due Process which began in protecting you from the government not providing for your day in Court when accused and transforming it to the fiction of where this is being led in perverted adults having a legal right to molest children as Hillary Clinton set the precedent that it was a "child's right to decide" is where the Supreme Court is corrupted. Justice Thomas is returning the court to American history and tradition to base what Constitutional Law is grounded and not in the perverted whim of black robes who want to play God.
It has been a corrupt fact that the justices who can see a right to privacy to be a pervert or baby killer can not see the right to keep and bear arms when written in the Second Amendment. The Thomas legal redress is a necessity in a court gone wrong. The Supreme Court and lower courts have gone astray in the past generation as astray as the rulings in Blacks were not humans in the 19th century.
At this moment the fiction of designer negro, Barack Hussein Obama, the birther who caused much of this upheaval is being eclipsed by an accomplished Black American in Clarence Thomas. Even more stunning in this Thomas Court is the fact that the President Clinton appointment of Ruth Bader Ginsburg who deemed Roe vs Wade as bad law in court overreach, brought all of this about, because if RBG who is now being scorned by the left had retired early, Birther Hussein would have nominated another one of his lesbian half wits to the court who would have continued this warpage which began in the courts in the 1960's. Ruth Bader Ginsburg a liberal Jew is a part of this in saving America from Birther Hussein Obama, by providing America with a Black Conservative Justice more a man of destiny that Obama will ever be.
In a mirror image, Clarence Thomas is setting the Supreme Court on course again as Chief Justice John Marshall guided the Supreme Court into what it would become from under the Founders in establishing the limits on the Court and not being a tyranny to the Legislative and Executive, but being a protector of the People in the enumerated limits the Constitution places on government to check and balance itself.
With the Thomas Court, you are not going to hear the question by the public, "Where the hell does that say that in the Constitution" as you have wondered with the corrupt Bungholer Roberts.
Nuff Said
agtG
agtG
