As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
When you read things from history, sometimes statements jump out that are quite startling. It was less than four score and seven years ago, when at his inauguration, President Lincoln spoke the words to Americans quoted below.
This country belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, then can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember and overthrow it.
President Abraham Lincoln
Inaugural Address 1861 AD
It is of interest that Thomas Jefferson spoke of that same revolutionary right
The overthrow of a government by those who are governed
Considering the instigated turmoil if Jan6 in 2020 AD in the year of our Lord, by the police state inciting violence and then using talking points about insurrection, compared to the propaganda of "peaceful demonstration" by BLM and ANTIFA burning down American cities, one understands the staging of this framing of Americans in how meticulous it was, because those behind this demanded a legal term of which Abraham Lincoln fought against, which President George Washington sent troops out in the Whiskey Rebellion, as there was no standing legally for rebellion or insurrection as the Executive had acted against that exercise in democracy, but it protected the inherent right of Americans for revolution, to overthrow the government.
It may not sound like much difference, but it is, and those in this scheme understood that completely, because they did not want Americans in stolen elections, knowing they had the right to revolt over this and overthrow the government hiding in Washington City which was engaged in this crime. So they made it into insurrection which is an attack on the Constitution as is rebellion. I realize in Lincoln speak this still might not sound correct, because if one does not Amend the Constitution and then overthrows it, the government is still changed or gone, but in insurrection the government is still gone as in a rebellion.
The key to comprehending this is in that earlier document. You may recognize the words still, but every Founder signed this Declaration to the right of revolution, against the government which had removed the rights of the People.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
The second part of the Preamble speaks as much today as it did in 1776 AD in the year of our Lord. The part about people suffering under tyranny rather than righting the state rings especially true in this plundered America.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
A long train of abuses. That does feel quite familiar in this generation of American made criminals by a police state which protects the inflictors.
As I began this, I'm always stunned to read the words of history and then go back and check the sources and realize that Abraham Lincoln was well aware of what he was speaking about.
If you do not like the results of an election, you do not get to secede from the Union as the Confederacy did. That is insurrection. There was no insurrection by Americans on Jan6. It was all a ruse by those in authority to provide a smoke screen in not using the word revolution, because everyone one of these people behind this, knew the last thing they wanted known was that Americans had a right to revolution and to overthrow a rule which was denying them their rights. That is why the Department of Justice went scorched earth in hunting down Americans for four years as that intimidation was meant to keep Americans from the discovery of what their documents legally provided them.
In none of the current tide, is the Lame Cherry invoking or calling for a revolution, but a revolution falls within the Constitutional means of redress like a Convention, which I do not favor either, as Americans have enough laws as they are not the problem. The problem is the people in power are not abiding by the laws or the Constitution. We just have a reality where those in power think that we are not all created equal to the law.
What does not fall in the Constitution is rebellion or insurrection. That is why those Jan6 plotters to frame Americans used that term. It has no place in America as even in a revolution, there is a framework of a Constitution still in place. In the Colonies it was English Common Law which was not erased as a provision of protecting the colonial state as it became a nation state.
Of course regimes choose to claim revolutionaries like George Washington were terrorists, so they can hang them, which was a charge flowing from the Department of Justice early in trying to say Jan6ers were terrorists because they protested in daylight peacefully, but Merrick Garland as the Attorney General had his insurrection of BLM and ANTIFA burning down cities at night, so that was legitimate in that screwy statement he produced.
We will no doubt hear this pendulum swing in rhetoric meant to entice you, but you are now educated with the reality of what is a right what is not a right, according to Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln.
It seems odd that twelve score and eight years ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation. The country does not need fixing no more than the Constitution. This nation simply requires people in power to abide by the limits as they are not in self control, and in being limited in power, the people are not going to be agitated and feel powerless and act out in being criminalized again.
Nuff Said
agtG
