As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
When Vice President JD Vance castigated the despots of Europe for not allowing political discourse and only censorship, the response from despots in Germany and England was draconian, in "Europe's elite could tell who the enemies from within were"............those enemies were their own Citizens.
That is chilling.
As chilling as Madame Le Penn winning the French elections in majority and all that voting majority being disenfranchised by minority leftist groups.
All of this once again reveals the God Inspired Genius of thee American Founders at Philadelphia in creating three branches of Government. James Madison studied for years the governments of the world from his present to antiquity, and understood the shortcomings and strengths of them all. Have you never asked yourself though why the Founders, thee Americans shunned the Parliamentary form of rule? England governed them with it, so it should have been a natural choice. None of them though fro the States to the Confederation to the Federation ever spoke for Parliament.
What is a Parliament? It is usually two houses in the legislative branch. Sometimes the upper is by birthright, sometimes it is elected like the lower. There is a Judiciary which is appointed by the Parliament.
If you perhaps noticed in thee above, that there is not an Executive mentioned. The astute will say that the Executive is the Prime Minister. Where does the Prime Minister come from though? Do the Canadians elect a Prime Minister? No as the Prime Minister might lead a party, but the electorate votes for Ministers in their provinces, who then vote for their leader who is Prime Minister. Do you get the disconnect in this and that this is nothing but mob rule, a democracy, which the Founders rejected.
Let me explain. In America you vote for a President and the Electoral College then on winning, votes for the President and Congress then confirms this in checks and balances to guard against emotional mobs.
What you have in Parliament is an absolute dictatorship and tyranny. The people vote for ministers who then from their mob of the few vote for someone who dictates to them. The Prime Minister never answers to the people. They can rule perpetually, and in this mob, as one can see in Europe in what JD Vance was castigating them about, minority despots can band together and thwart the majority vote of the People. It is all an insider game in Parliament. The Prime Minister is the same as the Parliament in they form dictatorial rule. There is no separation of powers to protect the people.
The Republican form of Governance which America alone has, has a Congress which answers to the People. The President does not come out of the Congress. He arises from the vote of the People. These two branches then appoint Judges, and in the Federal they are not voted for, but some states actually vote to retain their Judges too as another check against tyranny.
Europe, Canada and Australia, all are enslaved by this most wicked form of tyranny. Parliaments are dictatorships. In England one dictator in Cromwell hung another dictator in King Charles. This is not a Government by and for the People. This is a dictatorship of the elite who buy fringe groups after they have fractured the political structure so no majority can arise to save the nation.
The only legitimate Government which is a more perfect structure is a Republic. It is not perfect as Benjamin Franklin stated, as it's flaw is what John Adams warned, the Constitution requires honest people to govern.
Every Parliament in this world should be abolished, in Europe, the British, the Jews, the Japanese. Some peoples like the Japanese manage a Parliament better than most, because the Japanese are a prudent and focused people, coming out of their duty and honor. Others like Canada list like Australia in dictatorships and are against the People, because the People are always a threat to tyrants who have rigged the game for themselves.
Parliaments had their place in being an evolution from the absolute rule of a king. They now are an impediment to free peoples as Parliaments are a repressive rule of the many by the few, in a seizure of power of absolute rule again.
Nuff Said
agtG
