My бабушка has one just like this for English starlings in her garden.
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I found this interesting in the Russians doing commentary on the drones which Kiev was launching at Russia, had analyzed the fault of Russia and in turn documented how you shoot down drones effectively.
As this is where the reality of this world is. It would be prudent to tuck away the Russian knowledge on how to dispatch drones.
What could have prevented such a blow? It's very simple: a squad of 5-7 shooters with self-loading guns Vepr-12 "Hammer" with shotgun cartridges from CJSC "Techkrim" (Izhevsk) and turret-mounted anti-aircraft machine guns of the "Burelom" type, represented by 4-barrel 7.62-mm machine guns GSHG-7.62 (which were recently demonstrated at the MILEX exhibition-2025). These installations can work effectively on FPV drones and free-drop drones used against the Nebo-M complex. Therefore, it is time to move from beautiful exhibitions and exclusively export-oriented to the protection of our own strategic facilities.a
This starts off the visuals in what are drone killers. This is basically as semi automatic shotgun. Dude has chosen the odd number of 5 to 7 gunners. I would expect some kind of pattern set so not to have people getting muzzle blast.
Thinking Colonel Charles Askins here. If I were hired by the Pentagon fools, I would train these units to be mobile, because you do not want passing shots at drones which is a hard shot, you want them incoming or going away. That gives you the best pattern spread on ducks. Higher the better, but on roof tops, you would lose mobility.
I will show you how the Russians figured out pattern.
Leave it to the Russians to come up with what was deemed more dangerous to the cannoneers than the enemy, in chains fired with cannon balls on them...........the Russians appear to have put triangular lead weights with a flexible cord to snare drones.........is like a South American bolo.
See President Trump needs to drop the sanctions and let Americans import this kind of fun stuff.
This is the nearest I could find in the quad four light machine guns which the author was drooling over.
The quad fours were 1950's anti aircraft guns, much larger and the Vietcong used them to strafe American firebases at distance without effect. I think this is what the dude is talking about. Be allot of ammo to burn up.
My theory is that what would cut the cheese would be a sort of zombie that already exists. I would have Secretary of War Hegseth give me a pile of cash and I would build a spider grenade so to speak based on the M 203 grenade launcher.
Here are the specs.
| Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Mass | 3 lb (1.36 kg) (unloaded) |
| Length | M203/M203A2: 15 in (380 mm); M203A1: 12 in (305mm); |
| Barrel length | M203/M203A2: 12 in (305 mm); M203A1: 9 in (230mm); |
| Cartridge | 40×46mm SR |
| Action | Single shot |
| Rate of fire | 5 to 7 round/min aimed shots 15 to 17 round/min area suppression |
| Muzzle velocity | 250 ft/s (76 m/s) |
| Effective firing range | 382 yds (350 m) fire-team sized area target; 164 yds (150 m) vehicle or weapon point target |
| Maximum firing range | 437 yds (400 m) |
| Sights | Quadrant sight or ladder sight on rifle |
I would want a shell that would be effective to a quarter mile, 500 yard would be better. If it could be accomplished, I would want a 150 yard burst, to deploy the spider web, but to have some kind of burn assist to keep it flying to maximum distance to tangle up in the rotors of the drone.
Get too Pentagon nuts and you end up with a million dollar shell again shooting down 60,000 dollar drones.
I think a secondary detonation at the base of a wad, a lead base wad so it would continue to hold on target, and then these tentacles deployed kind of in a hoop with fishing spider wire and this would be a drone catcher.
The Russians though have the stupid version which is the most affordable and is a lesson to store away in what works against drones in combat.
Nuff Said
agtG
