As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I adore battleships. No one who loves the sea can not but hold esteem for them and that is why I'm pleased that President Trump is building the Trump Class of battleships. I will explain a bit more in this as most have no idea of the classes of these ships and I hope honestly to help the President with laying down the production and costs of these Trump battleships.
Most people know of the USS Missouri, the ship the Japanese Empire surrendered on. They were big girls like the Trump Class in 880 feet long. This was the Iowa class. They outweighed the proceeding class limited by World War I treaties, which were first the North Carolina class, and then a new girl group appeared in the South Dakota class of fast attack battleships. The South Dakota's give me shivers as they were fast, but could take the hell beat out of them by the Japanese military. When the South Dakota first appeared, she was known as Battleship X as she was top secret. The South Dakota group of ships was lighter by 10,000 tons, and in honest assessment the Iowa class was not that much of improvement in a difference of 6 knots.
The Trump Class will be large as the Iowa class but lighter like the South Dakota class. They will be missile ships along with the advanced technologies of rail guns etc... I have written of the ship which I believe the Navy should building in a sort of light aircraft carrier, catamaran which served as a battleship and landing craft, but that point is not going to be discussed here, as we are advocating the building of the Golden Fleet of Donald Trump.
The US President announced the creation of the "Golden Fleet" — grandiose Trump-class battleships. No, but what? There is a skyscraper "Trump Tower", a butterfly "Donald Trump" too — so why not a "Trump Battleship"?The warship will be as large as those that fought for the United States during World War II, but "a hundred times more powerful.". It will be equipped with naval guns, missiles (including nuclear ones), combat lasers, railguns, and hypersonic weapons. As they say, complete minced meat. In the early 2030s, it is planned to build up to twenty-five such battleships, the first of which will be the Daring.
My advocacy in this is from theoretical work I engaged in for designing materials which would be superior to allied steels and yet as strong. My theories are for nano technologies which would set bots loose on a honeycombed super structure which would appear as a ship. Weaving a carbon metal fiber into those spaces would be the production of the main housing of these ships and or tanks or aircraft. The bots would be like wasps secreting materials or bees, to produce a material which would be superior to impact, capable of being repaired when struck to stop a ship from sinking and leave a small radar signature.
These ships would be fast, but nothing is fast to a hypersonic missile. I have models in which I would use the ocean to submerge them in to hide them. I do not venture into the realm of zero gravity systems to lift and move these massive structures, but this is part of this Golden Fleet flotilla. President Trump should be thinking of his battleships as mother ships which would be in control of two dozen launch pods on the ocean floor, pre positioned and the massive punch where one battleship would be 25 if not 100.
Given the process, these foil ships could be produced at 100 per year, once the robotic wiring machines sped up the process of the fitting of the ships.
While I like the Russians the comment below has them sucking on the teet of British cliché assessments. You can read it and we can go on from there.
In general, a war with China is a bad option for Washington. But the problem for the United States is that there are currently no good options for them at all.
For a flat brain, the statement above is showing mental inability. I would not want war with China, but I would not say it is a bad option. There are simply other better options and there are numbers of good options for the United States concerning the Eurasians.
China has an aging fucktard population, peopled by business cheats and weird internet children. They are not a warrior class. They have made the mistake of going to sea when staying on land they had the resources to bankrupt America with a land war or force a nuclear war.
China has no material resources. China has no water. China only appeared because Jewish hedgefunders dumped money into China to modernize it for this conflict. China is substandard in war machinery and manpower.
In a 30 days war, China loses. In a war of attrition, China loses. That is not to advocate starting a war with China, it is to refute the point of the Russians on options.
Economic engagement is how one deals with China, and the weak point is BRICS and Russia. Russia is already moving toward America as the Russians do not trust the Chinese. President Trump engages e coin, with Russian investment and Russian peace, China degrades. Place the manufacturing into India, and the Japanese Korean group and China falters. Acquire the control of African resources and China is exposed as what it always has been, a nation of technology stealers who provide shoddy manufacture to prop up a paper tiger economy.
The Trump battleships are designed to force the Russians and Chinese to go big and thereby degrade their resources. These are going to be robotic ships in a crew of technicians maintaining the defense and offensive posture. Get China building ships like it is, and it wastes resources which should be going into the economic field.
So this is a glimpse of the Trump Golden Fleet. I desire to make it float with new technology. Frankly the nuclear energy power generation of these ships, would make a dandy firing platform into satellites or planes in near space, which would then direct the energy weapons into China.
This is the Lame Cherry version and is of course another exclusive in matter anti matter.
Nuff Said
agtG
