What do you see my children?
As most of you will never be a pathologist or medical examiner or investigator.......and unfortunately most of the experts are not............what do you see?
You will never know the scent of dead bodies, of blood, of urine and feces, of the stench of decomposing bodies from the first sweet taint to the predator inducing retch.
So what do you see?
Take it apart and let the crime scene speak to you.
Ask the questions in basic form. Was the female dressed or undressed when the events took place?
Was the female standing or laying down, was she even at this scene?
The scene is speaking to you, in is this a crime scene or is it something else.
You do not see blood splatter, that should tell you something. You do not see smears of blood.
You do see blood drainage from the wounds. Should there be or should there be more, should there be less. What is the scene telling you?
Why are her glasses on? Why is that necklace perfectly in position?
Did someone stage this event?
What of the weapons? How were they utilized and how did this all take place?
How as the head removed? Was it professional or was it an amateur?
Why is there not blood coming out of her mouth? Should there be blood coming out of her mouth?
Why is her body in this position? Why are her heals on and not removed as if in a struggle?
Was the assailant right or left handed? Was it male? Was this work one person, two people or more?
Let the scene speak to you and do not be distracted by the erotica of it, as if someone created this as a form of artwork.
You have three wounds, the neck, the chest and the abdomen. Which came first? Which was second and which was third?
The scene is telling you by the evidence.
Was she standing or laying down?
Why are her arms covering her breasts in modesty? What is the scene telling you?
We have a white female, eyes open and not closed..........why are the eyes not closed by her or the assailant?
Female was undressed before event the scene reveals. In analysis first wound was to the chest, by the large needle. Blood on needle indicates it penetrated through victim.
Assailant was not standing directly behind female.
Female was covering chest in modesty. Female continued to cover chest, as she did not deem wounds fatal, but they were.
Assailant withdrew needle rapidly and laid down needle with care as no blood smears indicate a rapidity.
This points to female was expiring due to blood loss in chest cavity, contained there, but not into lungs as no coughing from choking on blood is evident around lips.
Assailant was right handed by right hand nature of knife, placement of the needle and by head of female turned to the right.
In analysis it is deemed the assailant observed the female dying with care, and in peculiar trait produced the kitchen butcher knife and instead of laying said weapon down, the assailant placed in presentation the knife by inserting it into the abdomen, deep enough to penetrate arterial flow.
Such knowledge points to prior experience and a background in human anatomy.
Blood flow from abdominal wound indicates heart rate in victim had not yet expired.
Evidence points to by lack of blood splatter that assailant decaptitated female post death. Blood flow pattern is drainage from said wound.
Pooling to right, shows gravitational bias in floor slant to right.
Head position reveals the assailant positioned left hand under jaw of female, and by clean cut, utilzed the knife with skill. Knive blade does not show smearing nor blood stains, in the decapitation was cleanly sliced in one or two long swipes.
It is believed that knife was reinserted into abdomen for presentation. This reveals an orderly progression and tidyness in the assailant.
The three wounds in priority reveal an emotional motivation by the assailant. The presentation of knife and needle in orderly manner, points to a gift scenario as thee entire portrait was being reconstructed in the assailants mind and was ridding themselves of the driving emotions behind this assault.
Abdominal assault, concludes this was emotions felt deeply in the driving force in this assault.
Decapitation, concludes assault was finalized in removal of intelligence and leadership.
Conclusion, assailant was recreating past emotional assault upon them in rejection. Fine needle in two weapons, shows a piercing experience followed by a deep cutting in the deepest parts.
Assailant was rejected after a brief contact with female in the precise nature of the first wound. This then became an obsession out of a slight rejection, which built to assailant concluding the female was intellectually and leadershipwise out performing assailant and this was the chosen remedy to even the accounting.
It is believed that female undressed by demand or was caught. If by demand, then assailant wanted to strip the power structure of the allure of the female away, but not to making her naked, as nakedness was a discomfort level that was not intended, as the genital remaining uncovered points to a lack of intimacy between the two, and one which the assailant could not overcome by force or will.
The disconnect is apparent and the affection still lingered for the covering of the breast to remain and the genitals in modesty allowing death to occur in held together legs or positioning the scene.
Assailant desired female to see and keep seeing. so they would be taught the lesson which was presented and remember this was from a specified person as the female did not according to assailant comprehend all what was taking place and attempt to remedy it in the assailant's mind.
Conclusion, assailant was male, due to female covering herself up in modesty. Females of this nature would remaining uncovered with other females to intimidate them. Female shows this was a male and she concluded sexual assault would occur in her divining she was important in this.
Female did not suspect primary focus was homicide and expected to live.
Assailant is moderately intelligent male, of middle class economics, who is drawn to big things to make up for other shortcomings. Assailant is precise and will be noted for cleanliness. He will have some type of medical background or compulsion. Unsub wills to be noticed, so will present himself in faux economic preening of clothing, residence, vehicle, electronics and vacation to exhibit this persona.
With crossing racial profiles acting out, it is not certain which race Unsub would manifest in.
Victim will have known Unsub in the way her chastity would have to be preserved for Unsub illusions.
The forensics lecture continues........
agtG 285Y
