As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
Cherrystone Files: The Farkas File
According to the American Spectator in Jeffrey Lords, Evelyn Farkas told him, that the "RUSSIANS WERE BEHIND THE DISTRIBUTING OF THE NBC CONFESSION" which she made on Morning Joe. She also now explains that her live interview was edited in which she specifically confessed with no "IFS" involved at all, as everyone who has heard and read this interview, knows she confessed.
Jeffrey Lord with the American Spectator
Breaking News Exclusive: Evelyn Farkas Statement for The American Spectator: Video 'A Wild Misinterpretation' of Her Comments Jeffrey Lordhttps://spectator.org/exclusive-evelyn-farkas-statement-fo
As everyone has now caught up to the Lame Cherry exclusive in from Zerohedge to Sean Hannity in how this woman had classified information when she was out of the regime for over a year, it is time to point to the original exclusive of the Lame Cherry, because when Ms. Farkas made her sensational confession, which now she has realized has her looking at 20 years to life for espionage and accessing classified information.
Re read this Newsweek editorial of Evelyn Farkas, in Kurt Eichenwald's station in life when not going into seizure, in remember Eichenwald was going off in all kinds of moonbat allegations against Donald Trump, that Tucker Carlson bitch slapped him down over, which all referenced what we now know as PISSGATE, as what Ms. Farkas is saying in JANUARY, in making allegations that Vladimir Putin is blackmailing Donald Trump.
Does Putin Have Something on Trump? Obama Should Tell Us
By
So, I will repeat what I have written elsewhere: We need President Obama to share with the public the information the FBI has to date on this issue, and we need President-elect Trump to explain the full extent of his ties with the Kremlin and influential Russians.
We deserve to know:
- Did any American citizens collude with Russia to assist in the Kremlin’s efforts to interfere in U.S. elections? If so how, and were Trump associates, or Trump himself, aware?
- Have Russians given or loaned Donald Trump and/or his businesses money, or provided collateral or other financial assistance to Donald Trump?
3. Does our intelligence community assess that the Russian government has compromising information on President-elect Trump that may have been used or could be used to try to influence him?
REMEMBER NOW that Evelyn Farkas wrote the above on January 12, almost 2 months before her confession in March, now look at the 1, 2 and 3 of her criminal charges against Donald Trump.
- This is spying on Donald Trump at Trump Tower based on "Russian hacking".
- This is about the Estonian President's intelligence from April 2016.
- This is PISSGATE.
All of these stories had not yet broken in January. This is not an IF, AND or BUT. We have Kurt Eichenwald's TWEET on the exact day he had his seizure, and Eichenwald had access to the same classified PISSGATE dossier which had him making his cryptic charges against Mr. Trump on December 20, 2016.
Again, we have a time frame in this, that we know Farkas and Eichenwald KNEW about classified information by their charges, and the smears which the Obama regime were gearing up to disrupt and criminalize the Trump Administration.
If Kurt Eichenwald had just not made an issue in filing charges at the FBI against an Alt Right advocate, no one would have paid attention to this, nor would we have a time line to provide proof that classified material which the FBI was still in an active investigation over, as it still is according to Director James Comey as this all began in early 2016, but now we have a distinct time line, an active criminal investigation, and two people in Evelyn Farkas and Kurt Eichenwald who not only received classified intelligence, but were disseminating it in an active democratic Obama coup against an elected President of the United States.
Evelyn Farkas can claim all her definitions of IS as Bill Clinton in her definition of IF, but there is absolutely NO EXPLAINING AWAY her Newsweek editorial where she cited THREE ACTIVE CLASSIFIED INTELLIGENCE CHARGES which were the basis of the ACTIVE FBI INVESTIGATION.
When Rep. Nunes subpoenas Evelyn Farkas, Kurt Eichenwald must appear before the same committee, minus flashing lights to protect him, as there is absolutely no denying THE WRITTEN WORD in which Evelyn Farkas and the editors at Newsweek knew, because Newsweek is where the Evelyn Farkas confession began. There is no denying nor doubting it.
The entire confession of Evelyn Farkas, complete with photo smearing of the President of Russia and America, are posted below so they do not "disappear", as once those in Congress and law enforcement comprehend the time line and the material confession of Evelyn Farkas on January 12, 2017, it is a reality that she perjured herself before the American public and the world at American Spectator.
Once again another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter, as the cover ups protecting those who were behind this coup, are pressuring the evidence and the full story from being known.
Do not miss the last confession of Evelyn Farkas, where at Kurt Eichenwald's NEWSWEEK, she confesses that she KNOWS there is an active FBI investigation, which contains her three charges against Donald Trump in HACKING, MONEY LAUNDERING and PISSGATE, and Evelyn Farkas CONFESSES THAT BARACK OBAMA KNOWS THE DETAILS and Evelyn Farkas is demanding that Barack Obama release the information being leaked to everyone in this coup, and make this FAKE INTELLIGENCE SMEAR of Donald Trump a success in disseminating it to the American Public.
So, I will repeat what I have written elsewhere: We need President Obama to share with the public the information the FBI has to date on this issue,
As an additional note, so the above story will not disappear, I checked to make sure it was archived on the world wide web. I grabbed this screen shot, as it appears someone is most interested in the Evelyn Farkas confession at Newsweek, because it was archived yesterday for further reference and investigation.
Nuff Said
agtG
Does Putin Have Something on Trump? Obama Should Tell Us
The
mainstream press is correct to be cautious about the private sector
opposition campaign research dossier posted on the internet by BuzzFeed.
However, journalists and the world should not dismiss it entirely of hand. There are some things in it that are plausible—the internal Kremlin debate about their intelligence operation, why Putin’s chief of staff was suddenly fired and other items that ring true to those of us who have read intelligence reports on Russia.
And clearly the intelligence community wanted the president-elect to take at least the existence of this report, if not its content, seriously.
A two-page addendum regarding this report was attached to the intelligence community’s report on the Russian operation against the 2016 electoral elections.
This unusual move comes in the face of Donald Trump’s continued dismissal of Russian operations against the United States and our democracy, his disparagement of U.S. intelligence professionals and the unanswered questions about his business relationships with Russians.
Related: Trump, Putin and the hidden history of how Russia interfered in the U.S. presidential election
Donald Trump has been dismissing the threat posed by Russia to U.S. elections, to our democracy and even to him from the moment he entered the campaign for president. He hasn’t stopped dismissing the serious Russian intelligence and information operations against the American people, even after his election and practically on the eve of his inauguration.
Coupled with these dismissals are his repeated disparaging remarks about the U.S. intelligence community, often invoking the grave now 14-year-old mistake regarding whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2003.
Trump’s staff people have piled on, blaming some victims—the Democratic National Committee, the Clinton campaign computer techs and John Podesta—for poor cyberdefenses.
They claim that the Republican National Committee had better protections and/or responses. (This will likely only be proven false by the Russians, if they decide to use any hacked information from the RNC in the future.)
They minimize what Russia did, pointing out that the United States also hacks or spies, which is true, but they fail to add that our government has never operationalized and attacked a democratic state’s election process.
They have resorted to claiming that since the Russian operation has had no proven effect on the actual vote tally, we should move along, leaving aside the fact that the information from the hacks did contribute to the presidential campaign debates and political environment.
The U.S. intelligence officials—no jokers—decided that the matter was serious enough to warn Trump. Whether the information is partly true, all true, partly false or all false, the dossier, compiled by a former British intelligence officer as part of opposition political research on Donald Trump, cannot simply be dismissed. Indeed, it seems unlikely that is was entirely fabricated, because the intelligence community chose to forward it to Donald Trump and we haven’t heard a disavowal of it from them.
Their silence, for now, could indicate there is something to it.
Leaving aside the most salacious parts of the report on Trump, since the summer reporters have been writing about and investigating links between Trump’s staff, the Kremlin and Russia’s sharing of hacked American documents with WikiLeaks. They are seeking to find the truth on behalf of the rest of us.
So, I will repeat what I have written elsewhere: We need President Obama to share with the public the information the FBI has to date on this issue, and we need President-elect Trump to explain the full extent of his ties with the Kremlin and influential Russians.
We deserve to know:
Evelyn Farkas is a non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine, Eurasia from 2012 to 2015, and executive director, Graham-Talent WMD Commission and has served almost 20 years divided equally between the executive and legislative branches of government.
However, journalists and the world should not dismiss it entirely of hand. There are some things in it that are plausible—the internal Kremlin debate about their intelligence operation, why Putin’s chief of staff was suddenly fired and other items that ring true to those of us who have read intelligence reports on Russia.
And clearly the intelligence community wanted the president-elect to take at least the existence of this report, if not its content, seriously.
A two-page addendum regarding this report was attached to the intelligence community’s report on the Russian operation against the 2016 electoral elections.
This unusual move comes in the face of Donald Trump’s continued dismissal of Russian operations against the United States and our democracy, his disparagement of U.S. intelligence professionals and the unanswered questions about his business relationships with Russians.
Related: Trump, Putin and the hidden history of how Russia interfered in the U.S. presidential election
Donald Trump has been dismissing the threat posed by Russia to U.S. elections, to our democracy and even to him from the moment he entered the campaign for president. He hasn’t stopped dismissing the serious Russian intelligence and information operations against the American people, even after his election and practically on the eve of his inauguration.
Coupled with these dismissals are his repeated disparaging remarks about the U.S. intelligence community, often invoking the grave now 14-year-old mistake regarding whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2003.
Trump’s staff people have piled on, blaming some victims—the Democratic National Committee, the Clinton campaign computer techs and John Podesta—for poor cyberdefenses.
They claim that the Republican National Committee had better protections and/or responses. (This will likely only be proven false by the Russians, if they decide to use any hacked information from the RNC in the future.)
They minimize what Russia did, pointing out that the United States also hacks or spies, which is true, but they fail to add that our government has never operationalized and attacked a democratic state’s election process.
They have resorted to claiming that since the Russian operation has had no proven effect on the actual vote tally, we should move along, leaving aside the fact that the information from the hacks did contribute to the presidential campaign debates and political environment.
The U.S. intelligence officials—no jokers—decided that the matter was serious enough to warn Trump. Whether the information is partly true, all true, partly false or all false, the dossier, compiled by a former British intelligence officer as part of opposition political research on Donald Trump, cannot simply be dismissed. Indeed, it seems unlikely that is was entirely fabricated, because the intelligence community chose to forward it to Donald Trump and we haven’t heard a disavowal of it from them.
Their silence, for now, could indicate there is something to it.
Leaving aside the most salacious parts of the report on Trump, since the summer reporters have been writing about and investigating links between Trump’s staff, the Kremlin and Russia’s sharing of hacked American documents with WikiLeaks. They are seeking to find the truth on behalf of the rest of us.
So, I will repeat what I have written elsewhere: We need President Obama to share with the public the information the FBI has to date on this issue, and we need President-elect Trump to explain the full extent of his ties with the Kremlin and influential Russians.
We deserve to know:
- Did any American citizens collude with Russia to assist in the Kremlin’s efforts to interfere in U.S. elections? If so how, and were Trump associates, or Trump himself, aware?
- Have Russians given or loaned Donald Trump and/or his businesses money, or provided collateral or other financial assistance to Donald Trump?
- Does our intelligence community assess that the Russian government has compromising information on President-elect Trump that may have been used or could be used to try to influence him?
Evelyn Farkas is a non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine, Eurasia from 2012 to 2015, and executive director, Graham-Talent WMD Commission and has served almost 20 years divided equally between the executive and legislative branches of government.
