...and I just got Saddam Hussein's Iron Maiden
and will be using it tomorrow to investigate Mrs. Manafort
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
There is always a definitive problem when a self proclaimed zealot on a vendetta, to avenge his protege James Comey, against a President that Robert Mueller did not vote for, gathers around him, other zealots of the Obama Clinton sphere, hypes them up on fake dossiers and "Watergate Rides Again", and the FBI agents under his urging break into a Citizen's home, in the Manaforts in the darkness, pull them from their bed, search the wife in her nightie and rant at Paul Manafort in threats that they are going to indict him.
That kind of zealotry brings with it, the ends justifying the means, and the means are that Robert Mueller and all those around him are above the law, so normal FBI protocols are swept aside by the Manafort Mob, as getting Donald Trump is all that matters.
Into this, a reality has appeared as Robert Mueller is involved with the Uranium One treachery against America, that Robert Mueller's investigators in the FBI raiders, ignored all of Paul Manafort's Constitutional Rights, in the right of Attorney Client Privilege.
This blog first made mention of this in the golden thread of all are innocent until proven guilty and woven into this weave are the Rights of the Citizen, but now Robert Mueller has tattered this sacred weave in his FBI raiders seized information which was between Paul Manafort and his Attorney.
Through an older CNN article, we get a bit more of a hint about what specifically the agents may have gathered:
During that raid, Mueller’s investigators took documents considered to be covered by attorney-client privilege, sources told CNN. Lawyers from the WilmerHale law firm, representing Manafort at the time, warned Mueller’s office that their search warrant didn’t allow access to attorney materials. The documents in question have now been returned, the sources say.As the article points out, this certainly brings up concerns as to what exactly was seized, what investigators saw, and who handled the material. You can’t “unsee” evidence once you saw it.
Robert Mueller, his coven of investigators and the FBI raiders all read and examined documents which they are legally forbidden to examine, for the sacred right of defense of the Attorney and the Client.
This is not some vague assumption, but is a ruling of the Deputy Associate Attorney at US Justice and has been ruled on by a Federal Judge who threw out all evidence gathered as it was all a tainted seizure.
Compounding this, Mr. Manafort's Attorney warned the FBI and the FBI still violated Mr. Manafort's rights.
In 2005, Eric D. McArthur, who coincidentally now serves as Deputy Associate Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice, authored an article about the Fourth Amendment implications if investigators collect attorney-client privileged information. He wrote:
[T]he Fourth Amendment is violated when the government purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently searches privileged attorney-client communications. In other words, the Fourth Amendment is violated whenever law enforcement officials have reason to believe that a search or seizure is likely to expose them to privileged attorney-client communications and fail to take reasonable steps to minimize their exposure.A similar issue came up recently in a case against Wall Street financier Benjamin Wey. A federal judge threw out all of the evidence gathered against him through warrants because the “sweeping” searches of his property violated his Fourth Amendment right. Judge Alison Nathan found that the searches were “grossly negligent” in that they collected evidence that went beyond the scope of the warrant like medical records, and divorce records. In the case of Manafort, it appears that his lawyers warned investigators about the existence of attorney-client privileged documents and memos. If investigators didn’t take the proper precautions to avoid collecting these documents, they could be in trouble for violating Manafort’s constitutional rights.
This entire zeal was all through this Mueller vendetta, because it has been revealed that the same Judge who allowed all of this, also forced an Attorney to testify against her clients. This is the weave which binds all law together and that is Attorney Client Privilege.
Prosecutors convinced a federal judge to require a lawyer for Trump campaign officials Paul Manafort and Rick Gates to testify before the grand jury investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 election, a court ruling unsealed on Monday showed.
The unusual move is an indication of the aggressiveness of special counsel Robert Mueller's prosecution team as they prepared to indict Manafort and Gates on charges of money laundering and failing to register as foreign agents. The 12-count indictment was made public on Monday.
Lawyers for Manafort and Gates fought the prosecution's drive to intrude on attorney-client communications. But Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that an exception, which involves using a lawyer to commit crime or fraud, applied to contacts with an attorney who helped respond to inquiries about why the pair had not filed foreign-agent lobbying registrations with the Justice Department.
There is absolutely nothing that Robert Mueller has not violated yet and by all appearances if there was a dungeon at the Justice Department he would now be questioning Paul Manafort's wife as all there was, was Harvey Weinstein fondling and the rack has not yet been employed.
This is the stuff of Tehran, Peking, Pyongyang, and now with Robert Mueller in his inquisition, it assaulting the lives of Americans.
In review of the following reality, what Robert Mueller has charged Paul Manafort with, all are based on the pre dawn raid, in which Robert Mueller violated Paul Manafort's Constitutional Rights, meaning Robert Mueller and his FBI raiders broke the law.
The FBI’s predawn search of Paul Manafort’s northern Virginia home in July yielded important new evidence crucial to the indictment of Donald Trump’s campaign chairman and one of his close associates, according to the indictments unsealed yesterday by special counsel Robert Mueller.Remember in this that Manafort's records were all know and reviewed years ago, without any charges brought by competent law enforcement. It was though only when Mueller broke the law, that charges were brought, charges which have been deemed "creative".
FORMER PROSECUTOR: SHAKY, OVERCHARGED CASE...
There is nothing in this that has anything to do with Russian hacking which was what Mueller was supposed to be investigating. This indictment took place as Robert Mueller sought to save himself from criminal inquiry over Uranium One. What is left in this then is the violation of Paul Manafort's rights, in the deliberate skewing of information in this witch hunt, which now it is clear in the violation of Mr. Manafort's 4th Amendment Rights, that everything seized in the Manafort home is illegal evidence.
The charges against Paul Manafort must be dropped, US Justice must apologize to Mr. Manafort, and charges must be brought against Robert Mueller over this as Mueller and his coven of investigators have impeded a federal investigation by their criminal acts.
Furthermore, all of the FBI raiders must face discipline by the FBI and should be removed from all federal law enforcement as they have violated standards which are never to be crossed.
Robert Mueller is a disgrace to the Justice Department and messiah complex of Kant ends justifying the means has violated all trust the people have in laws which protect them from this lawlessness.
In all historical examination, King George stooped to this Muellerness in 1776 against subjects of the crown. This is all the Constitution protects the Citizen from, but there is now nothing to protect the American People from Robert Mueller and his witch hunt coven of lawlessness.
agtG
