Friday, December 11, 2020

Is Donald Trump Historical or History - The Rubicon

 


As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

 

With the subversion of United States Constitutional Law negating injured parties, led by President Donald Trump, and the State of Texas, the widespread criminal fraud in the United States against the free and fair vote, has brought the United States to the precipice of other Presidents who were faced with the jeopardy of the end of the United States.

George Washington faced his Rubicon moment in 1774, where he invoked a martial response, making him an enemy of the State, and would be hung for taking up arms to defend life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

 

As political tensions rose in the colonies, Washington in June 1774 chaired the meeting at which the "Fairfax Resolves" were adopted, which called for, among other things, the convening of a Continental Congress. In August, Washington attended the First Virginia Convention, where he was selected as a delegate to the First Continental Congress. As tensions rose further in 1774, he assisted in the training of county militias in Virginia and organized enforcement of the boycott of British goods instituted by the Congress

 

 It was President Jefferson, in dealing with the insurrection by Aaron Burr, who with future President James Madison, foresaw the need to provide the authority, not in the Constitution to deploy federal troops. The remedy was the Insurrection Act.

The Insurrection Act is not some great mystery. It is in fact the rule of law. The Insurrection Act is design to provide Presidential Authority, to order military action against any state, when that state deprives the Citizen of rights, privileges, immunity or protections.
In short, Joe Biden with Chinese communists stealing an election for Biden from President Donald Trump, is depriving the Citizens of that state and all Trump elected States of their unalienable rights.


 Section 253 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which gives the president the right to take military action within a state when “any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection.”


It was the Insurrection Act, which Abraham Lincoln based the Emancipation Proclamation on, and that emancipation was based in the use of military force, as it was military emancipation. It was the definitive Constitutional check and balance, in order to protect rights laid down on paper, those rights had to be protected not with words, but with force, Second Amendment based force, by the Commander in Chief of the United States military.


 

Even military history included one incident of military emancipation prior to the Civil War. During the 1830s the Seminole Wars in Florida were known as the graveyard of American military reputations. Operating in small bands in thickly forested swamps, the guerrilla tactics of the forested swamps, the guerrilla tactics of the Seminoles were highly effective against the regular officers and soldiers of the US Army. Zachary Taylor was one of the few generals to fight them with a measure of success,” wrote Burrus M. Carnahan. Taylor refused to reunite with their old masters the slaves who were captured with the Seminole guerillas – insisting instead in deporting them with the Seminoles to the Indian Territory that is now Oklahoma.6

According to Carnahan, “As a legal proposition, Taylor’s policy had important implications for the legitimacy of Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. General Taylor and the War Department were in effect asserting that he rules of international law of war could affect private property rights established by state law, even if the ‘war’ was an internal conflict rather than an international one. (The United States government, of course, never recognized the Seminoles, or any band of hostile Indians, as a foreign enemy; legally they were always rebels against Federal authority, just like the Confederates.)”7

 

President Lincoln linked the military to rights as a necessity. Lincoln understood that the struggle which was faced was one which would end the United States. Military Emancipation merited the first consideration for Lincoln as without it, there were only the words of Lincoln against the words of others who had ended the Union.

 

 

When President Lincoln acted, he acted in consonance with the doctrine of military necessity. Historian Allan Nevins wrote: “Lincoln’s sagacity did not fail him in the form of the document. It was an exercise of war powers; its main intent was not the liberation of a race (though he was fully conscious of this aspect) but the furtherance of the war effort and the preservation of the Union; and he did well to couch it in cold legal phraseology, direct and deadly as a bullet. [Charles] Sumner and [Horace] Greeley regretted the absence of rhetorical flourishes; ‘a poor document, but a mighty act,’ was John A. Andrew’s verdict. But its moral import spoke for itself, and Lincoln, as [James Russell] Lowell remarked in the Atlantic, would have weakened it by an attempt at misplaced eloquence.”8

Ralph R. Fahrney, biographer of Tribune editor Horace Greeley, wrote that the doctrine of military necessity was strong supported by Greeley: “In every phase of the emancipation propaganda, whether the government was being urged to a more advanced position concerning the status of slavery, or public opinion was being aroused to the acceptance and espousal of partial or complete liberation of the slaves, Tribune readers faced the argument of the military necessity in all its various ramifications. All ‘abstract considerations’ were put aside. Others might set forth the undeniable facts concerning the wrongfulness of the accursed institution, but slavery ‘as an element of power’ in the tremendous struggle which threatened the life of the nation merited first consideration.

The actual tangible military result which he declares was his constitutional and legal warrant for his edict of military emancipation is set forth in the following extracts. Whether we judge it by the narrow technical rules of applied jurisprudence, or by the broader principles of the legal philosophy of Christian nations, it forms equally his complete vindication. In the draft of a letter to Isaac M. Schermerhorn he wrote, September 12, 1864: ‘Any different policy in regard to the colored man deprives us of his help, and this is more than we can bear. We cannot spare the hundred and forty or fifty thousand now serving us as soldiers, seamen and laborers, This is not a question of sentiment or taste, but one of physical force, which may be measured and estimated as horse power and steam power are measure and estimated. Keep it, and you can save the Union. Throw it away, and the Union goes with it.”

 

The list of Presidents who have invoked the Insurrection Act, is long and respected, President Thomas Jefferson, President Abraham Lincoln, President Dwight Eisenhower, President John Kennedy, President HW Bush, President George W. Bush.

The fact is President George Washington as General was the Insurrection Act father. President Andrew Jackson threatened force against Southern States if they attempted to secede.  The entire plains Indian War campaigns under President US Grant were the Insurrection Act in process. President Franklin Roosevelt, rounding up Japanese and intimidating German Americans, was the Insurrection Act.

 

 

Since 1807, the Insurrection Act has been amended several times to meet different political challenges.

In 1861, Abraham Lincoln expanded the law to form the legal basis for waging the Civil War. Without it, he wouldn’t have had the authority to send federal troops into a state without the governor’s permission.

 

 

That’s the same authority invoked during the civil rights era by Presidents Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy to deploy troops to the South to enforce desegregation in defiance of governors.

The Insurrection Act was last invoked in 1992 under President George H.W. Bush, after Peter Wilson, then-governor of California, requested help to quell widespread riots after four police officers charged in the beating of Rodney King were acquitted. 

In 2005, after Hurricane Katrina devastated Louisiana and the Gulf Coast, President George W. Bush explored expanding the Insurrection Act to place command of the region's National Guard under federal control. Ultimately, Bush declined to invoke the act, although it was eventually amended in 2006 to broaden the scope under which the president may act under the law.

 

I have no idea if President Donald Trump has the fortitude to join the great leaders of America. I do know if he does not protect the United States, he will become a greater pariah than Adolf Hitler, because the same media which assisted in covering up the Biden crimes will not stop until pedophile Joe Biden is the child raping hero and Donald Trump is Adolf Hitler of the 21st century.

Julius Caesar had won victories in Europe, and was appointed military governor of Gaul or France. The regime of Rome was threatened by this most successful military and political leader and ordered him to Rome, but in Rome that order had mandates attached to keep the regime in power as no military leader could enter Rome at the head of his army.
The barrier in this was a territorial river which separated Italy proper from the territories, and that river was the Rubicon.

It was here that Caesar. leading the 13th Legion, decided upon the historical course which saved Rome from stagnant leadership and transcended Rome into a power of the centuries. Rome, the system, chose to destroy it's most competent leader. There is a mirror image in the stagnation of America in the deep state moving to destroy the inspirational choice of Americans in her most competent leader since President Ronald Reagan, and the Supreme Court crushed all form of Republican Government in rejecting President Donald Trump's day in court.

Understand this that Presidents do not end a democracy or a Republic by invoking the Insurrection Act as their Rubicon moment, when criminals overthrow government, use the media to cover it up and the courts sanction criminal fraud, government by the people, of the people and for the people has been obliterated. President's save their People by invoking the Insurrection Act.

"alea iacta est"  The dice has been thrown on Election Day and is in the air. President Donald Trump's destiny has tied the entire world to what his future is, once that die hits the floor, and all of our lives are in that cast of the dice too.

If President Trump does not act, the United States will devolve into the murderous Triumvirate, which Caesar rose from to save Rome. Joe Biden with his removing self defense, using the police state to destroy liberties, and banning the police to be targets for the Biden terror state, is the Crassius and Obama was the Sulla who installed this reign of terror.

The fact is that Donald Trump crossed the Rubicon in 2015 AD in the year of our Lord, in 2020 President Donald Trump must amplify his Twitter words with military emancipation.

 

Benjamin Franklin warned that either we as Americans all hung together or we would hang separately.  The British would have hung Washington if they could have gotten him. Lincoln would have been hung by the Confederates if they could have gotten to him. The same reality is what President Donald Trump faces. The British would have hung every American and the Confederates would have turned the north into Andersonville given their opportunity.

Caesar would have been executed if he had not moved with military emancipation. Donald Trump must move with military emancipation.  The time has past for corrupt civil courts. George Washington and Abraham Lincoln did not sue London or Richmond. The time has come for Donald Trump to be either historical or history.


Massachusetts House Passes Democrat Amendment Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth   lifenews 


How many more Americans must die before the Insurrection Act is unleashed to protect Americans.

That includes the reaction from GOP Chair Allen West in official response to the Supreme Court joining lawlessness against thee American People.

 

 “The Supreme Court, in tossing the Texas lawsuit that was joined by seventeen states and 106 US congressman, have decreed that a state can take unconstitutional actions and violate its own election law. Resulting in damaging effects on other states that abide by the law, while the guilty state suffers no consequences.”

“This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable. This decision will have far reaching ramifications for the future of our constitutional republic.


“Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.”

 

The Lame Cherry disagrees absolutely with Allen West for the absolute military reason that secession is retreat. Americans hold the Presidency, the President commands the military, the President has full authority in the Insurrection Act and September 2018 Executive Orders on foreigners meddling in American elections, the President has the Constitution and 100 million armed legal gun owners. America has the field. America does not go crawling off to leave the nation to criminals. America prosecutes this in the rule of law by military emancipation.

President Donald Trump, get off your ass and lead. Cross the Rubicon and restore this Union by the People, of the People and for the People.

 


Nuff Said.

 

 

agtG