The comments by acting US Attorney Michael Sherwin appeared to be an effort to walk back claims that federal prosecutors in Arizona had made in a court filing late on Thursday, in which they claimed there was evidence that rioters intended "to capture and assassinate elected officials".
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
Like most Americans viewing the January 6th events, where ANTIFA and BLM caused 2 billion dollars in damages across America, and had charges dropped, while the FBI releases statements that ANTIFA and BLM were not behind helping to frame Americans who entered the Capitol, we have been subjected to blatant abuse of power by the Department of Justice in having the FBI hunt Americans down.
Incarceration without bail has been used as torture to break Americans. Those awaiting hearings have had cockroaches crawling on them so they could not sleep. Others had to petition for food for special diets.
Then there is the list of non crimes, opening a business, having police tape, carrying "dangerous" crutches and batons and yelling at police, as content which does not belong in an indictment and only one Judge granted parole and lectured the prosecutors that opening a business and wearing clothes is not a crime.
The above link was one of the more bizarre statements which came from the Department of Justice and democrats in Congress, that assassinations were going to take place, and that Republicans had been helping those who entered the Capitol.
In this hysteria this was an abuse of power by US Attorney Michael Sherwin, and the statements which this US Attorney admitted to on CBS' 60 Minutes, are an admission of real crimes, in a conspiracy by the Department of Justice to intimidate innocent Americans.
Sherwin admitted they used a war tactic from the Iraq War in SHOCK AND AWE to break Americans and knowingly deprive them of their rights. This is terrorism as it terrorized innocent people. Candice Owens reported that 10 of her innocent friends attended the Capitol rally and the FBI appeared at their doors and harassed them, when they had violated not one law.
It is the quote of Sherwin stating that mass arrests had only one purpose, and that was not enforcing the law, but intimidating one political party to silence them. Sherwin states that the DOJ's terrorizing Americans worked as they all thought they were going to be arrested for PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY in simply visiting their Nation's Capitol.
Federal prosecutor Michael Sherwin
“After the 6th, we had an inauguration on the 20th. So I wanted to ensure, and our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe that we could charge as many people as possible before the 20th,” Sherwin told CBS News.
He added: “And it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they’re like, “If we go there, we’re gonna get charged.”’
Sherwin made it clear that the feds went after people who had gone viral regardless of whether they perpetrated any violence or committed any actual crime.
There is a problem with what US Attorney Sherwin did, in spreading lies and smears against Americans, and US Republicans in Congress, and then admitting that it was a lie in walking it back as there was not any evidence, and that problem is that Freedom of Speech, Political Protest and Freedom of Assembly without being hunted down is a Constitutional Right. Sherwin admits that he went after Americans who were protesting online, and never set foot in the US Capitol.
This has further damning abuse of power in the subject of a Green Beret in Florida which Homeland was interviewing for posts online BEFORE January 6th and admitted to him that trouble would happen in January, is that Homeland stated that Facebook and Twitter were turning over personal speech to the FBI without warrant violating American's privacy.
Those points in the above paragraphs, based upon what US Attorney Sherman confessed to on 60 Minutes violates US Federal Crimal Statute 18 Section 242, which plainly states that no one in law enforcement can misuse the law, to deprive any Citizen of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution.
Doing so is a CRIME by law enforcement. When the DOJ engaged in Serial Terrorism in Mass Arrests, they deprived each American by ruthless intimidation their Right to Assemble at Washington DC.
What US Attorney Michael Sherwin engaged in, in conspiracy with the DOJ, FBI, Homeland, US Martials and the US National Guard was to deprive Americans of their Rights.
The federal criminal statute that enforces Constitutional limits on conduct by law enforcement officers is 18 U.S.C. § 242. Section 242 provides in relevant part:
"Whoever, under color of any law, …willfully subjects any person…to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States [shall be guilty of a crime]."
Section 242 is intended to "protect all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and furnish the means of their vindication." Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 98 (1945) (quoting legislative history).
To prove a violation of § 242, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that the defendant deprived a victim of a right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, (2) that the defendant acted willfully, and (3) that the defendant was acting under color of law. A violation of § 242 is a felony if one of the following conditions is met: the defendant used, attempted to use, or threatened to use a dangerous weapon, explosive or fire; the victim suffered bodily injury; the defendant's actions included attempted murder, kidnapping or attempted kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse or attempted aggravated sexual abuse, or the crime resulted in death. Otherwise, the violation is a misdemeanor.
Establishing the intent behind a Constitutional violation requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the law enforcement officer knew what he/she was doing was wrong and against the law and decided to do it anyway.
What this blog is stunned by, is this corruption in the DOJ so above the law, as we have witnessed it is, that a US Attorney can go on CBS and brag about it, and have no concerns that the 1% are going to be incensed that their engineered criminalization of nationalism for globalism to dictate all laws has the public now informed that the DOJ in mass just
What the DOJ has been involved in for months and it will continue for years as the new Attorney General Merrick Garland has promised to hunt down more Americans, are Civil Rights Abuses of Americans.
This is quite serious as USC 18 Section 242 states that any law enforcement officer who fails to intervene to stop another law enforcement officer from violating the Civil Rights of Americans, is guilty of the same crime. In other words, it is not just the US Attorney's engaged in filing these Serial Charges of Mass Intimidation, it is everyone in Justice, and that includes all of Homeland, FBI, US Marshals, who has not filed a report or charges, is guilty of the same criminal activity of Michael Sherwin.
Failure to Intervene
An officer who purposefully allows a fellow officer to violate a victim's Constitutional rights may be prosecuted for failure to intervene to stop the Constitutional violation. To prosecute such an officer, the government must show that the defendant officer was aware of the Constitutional violation, had an opportunity to intervene, and chose not to do so. This charge is often appropriate for supervisory officers who observe uses of excessive force without stopping them, or who actively encourage uses of excessive force but do not directly participate in them.
Nothing is going to be done about this, as we all know, as the DOJ is a corrupt as the other three branches of government, including the media. It requires being stated thought that mass arrests meant to intimidate Americans which deprive them of their Rights is a crime when law enforcement engages in this organized bullying.
Federal Judge Accuses DOJ Attorneys of Defrauding The Court, Threatening Witness in Case of ATF Whistleblower Jay Dobyns
In his opinion, Allegra said ATF exhibited "organizational weaknesses," in handling the threats against Dobyns and described ATF officials as demonstrating misfeasance in the case "rooted in the sorry failure of some ATF officials."
“The violations occurred because of the way officials like ASAC Gillett and RAC Higman functioned – and were allowed to function – after the arson, especially in terms of how Agent Dobyns was treated”; “In the courts view, the evidence showed that ASAC Gillett and Agent Higman knew that Agent Dobyns was not responsible for the fire, and still allowed him to be treated as a suspect as a form of payback. Moreover, ATF officials knew, or should have known, that individuals like ASAC Gillett and Agent Higman should not have been allowed to participate in the investigation – as it turned out their conduct was not only reprehensible, but predictably so.
This is once again another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti mater.
Nuff Said
agtG
