The debate point does not matter in whether dreadlocks or nuking Ukraine,
you never cut your hair and you always cut your losses.
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
The Lame Cherry approaches all from strategy and tactics. This is not about political assemblies which bring about war, but it is as the Soldier views war, in what is it that will keep politicians from waging wars that Soldiers are in.
If this were a debate, the understood question would be, "Is not Ukraine perfect for nuclear theater war? So why should not one side or the other initiate this solution?"
Ukraine is a primitive nation. It has wheat in the west and oil in the east.
We read a great number of threats from Russia about nuclear war, and a great many couch politicians having decided that Russia will not use nuclear weapons, so the West continues to attempt to disrupt the government in Russia.
If Ukraine is to go to nuclear war or lead the world into nuclear war, would not it be more advantage to do this earlier than later, when everyone would have their nukes ready to fire and planned out?
OK, so in this debate, we know that Russian security assisted in an attempt on President Putin's life. These were paid by the CIA and MI6. When American thought Russia was behind the JFK assassination, nuclear retaliation was on the agenda. So why not for Russia? Russia now has carte blanche for a limited nuclear strike to settle things.
Examine the Russian advantages in nuclear strikes in Ukraine. Russia shuts down food production to Europe and the 3rd world.. Russia shuts down oil and gas production to Europe. Russia pollutes a large border that NATO fag troops will not desire to set foot in.
Obama, that is Barack Hussein Obama started wars to cause disurption in the 3rd world to cause upheaval in Europe and America in mass invasion. Russia starving the 3rd world, would cause a mass exodus to western Europe and the United States. Major problems on those nations ability to cope.
Shutting off oil and gas, would cause major hardships in Europe. Dictator Biden sold of US strategic reserves to China as a treasonous bribe, so America has zero cushion. Europe would beg America for oil and gas, and thereby America and Europe would both be imploded into a super Obama depression.
All of that accomplished with just a few tactical nukes in Ukraine in a Russian strike in response to assassination attempts upon Vladimir Putin.
Mr. Putin has been the moderate in Russia. Everyone else has been pushing for a more aggressive Russia. If Mr. Putin goes, then this nuclear use will indeed become the Russian gambit, so would it not serve Russian interests to begin this before the moderate was removed from Russia?
On the Russian counter view. Russia has enough food to feed it's population. It has enough nuclear bunkers to save it's entire population. The main point in this is, Russia will not nuke the East in Ukraine but the West, and that drift could be managed to go into Europe. The other point in this is, "Who in their woke mind is going to nuke Russia over Ukraine, which would then bring the full Russian response of nuclear retaliation in America and western Europe?"
As a debate point, Ukraine is like a pressure relief valve on a boiler. If you do not nuke Ukraine, and wake the woke up in the West, then it will not stop until the entire boiler blows up the world. The logic would be to let off nuclear steam now, and not have the entire volcano blow later as this spreads over a wider area.
This would also provide the check with China against Russia, as Russia would not be smoldering ruins, but an active partner in food, resources and oil to China. Russia would remain strong, and China would not dare take advantage. In fact, China would become a greater contender with the United States.over food, trade and oil centered on Africa.
The lame would think this is the Lame Cherry advocating nuclear war. Here am I not advocating that. This is an examination of a problem, a coming planned reality, and the most suitable way for people who are not protected by their regimes against nuclear war and starving, from being mass casualties in a big world nuclear war.
Russia could come out, present her evidence at like the United Nations with full confessions and say something like, "OK the CIA and MI6 paid traitors in Russia to assassinate our President. That is an act of war. Russia retaliates in this way in 5 minutes. Russia hits the intelligence headquarters with tactical nukes in the host nations, Russia blows up 5 American and British military bases, and Russia nukes Ukraine in ending this NATO proxy war. If any retaliation comes against Russia, Russia will launch nuclear salvos for the next three months at the host nations. This ends today".
This is a debate point examination of the current events and the logical solutions to stop the current events from escalating to full nuclear war.
The point is concluded.
Nuff Said
agtG
agtG
