As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
It is time for an assessment of the Russian military in Ukraine, based upon the facts.
It would be easier to issue bad marks than to list the excellent marks.I will list the excellent marks, but there are many of them.
The Russian Air Force has been superb. Their platforms from jets and bombers have shown exceptional. That then translates into the air to surface missiles which have been unleashed. The Russians dominate and hit what they are aiming at.
The extension of this is the Russian Missile Force. This touches upon the Russian Naval Forces where numbers of salvos have originated from in the Caspian and Black Sea regions. That is an immense distance, and even at that, the Russians hit their targets. That equals anything the Americans or NATO have manufactured.
Russian artillery has been phenominal. They target the best American pieces, overcome them, and obliterate swathes of Ukrainazi's in the forest and field.
What has been overlooked is the NATO constructed bunker network in the Donbass designed to stop Russia. Russia destroyed it and eliminated it in 8 months, including the super complexes.
In a world of expensive missiles, Russia has show the value of artillery, interwoven which is more affordable and as accurate as missiles.
Russian tanks and missile launchers, again superb.
This Russian military built upon the Bush41 Shock and Awe is a complete masterpiece of the original American system, which is now in woke degradation. The Russians learned exceptionally well.
Much has been made of "Russian setbacks". The Russians have never had any setbacks. They used feints and when complete they redeployed.
This brings us to the "good" ratings which is low as the Russian military goes. Russia went into Ukraine with conscripted soldiers. These are not front line, but draftees. Yes there were setbacks, but that was not due to cowardice. It was NATO advising the Nazis who were exploiting gaps in the Russian lines. When surprised the Russians fled, rather than die. That is normal in those situations, and is not a defect, but a reality of Americans who produce the same gaps in their lines and depend upon massive air power to then destroy the enemy.
That lesson will be one which cause numerous American and NATO casualties when this group faces a real military which it has never faced. It had enough problems with the NATO dopers in Afghanistan with the the Taliban there.
On the contrary, the only positive for NATO has been their advisers have enacted a superb policy for the holocaust of the Slavic Nazi. Along with the Grubber of Kiev, they have slaughtered more than 100,000 of their own people, gotten over 200,000 injured and have now gotten Ukraine bombed back to the stone ages. The Ukrainians without selling the soul of their country for expensive weapons, could have probably produced a slaughter like this on their own.
In noting the above, NATO has put into the war zone, it's most sophisticated and advanced weapons. HIMARS, 777 Artillery are the trumpeted best. Each and every system has been a complete failure.
That includes the training of the Nazi. They have failed. The only thing they have excelled at is dying and brutality in war crimes.
The Ukrainian soldiers are a reflection of the fat pedophiles of the European military. They will no more fight than the Nazi would.
If one examines the British forces, they are trained well, but their air force bombs their own men.
In that, there are not enough Americans in their vax depleted and homosexual ranks to fill in the countrywide gaps in the NATO forces. Russia has a compact military force, NATO is scattered pockets which expect the suicide F 35 nuclear bomber to fill in those gaps and this will not work in a war, where Russia has the S series of weapons which will blow anything out of the sky. What Ukraine has taught Russia is how to neutralize American and NATO weapons.
The Kremlin leadership is also superb. NATO is lacking in every way. This is a decade old planned NATO war with full American Pentagon advice, and instead of ending Russia in the Schwabian daydream, Russia has at one year, embarked upon the annexation of what was Ukraine with full success.
What is to be factored in, is once the Russian Army in it's full ability, is joined to the Air Force and Navy which has been excellent, the entire force of Russian front line troops will be presented. Russia will fight different in that mode, as Ukraine was the lions not scaring the herd.
Russia claims a hotel in central Kyiv that was hosting NATO advisers and foreign mercenaries was hit.
Command centers, energy facilities, anti-aircraft bases were also hit in:
– Khmelnitsky
– Kyiv (Solomensky, Pechersky and Goloseevsky districts)
— Kyiv region
— Kharkiv
region — Vinnytsia region — Odesa
—
Dnepropetrovsk region
— Nikolaev
— Zhytomyr
Region — Ternopil Region
— Zaporizhzhya
Power outages in:
— Kyiv
— Kyiv region
— Kharkiv
— Kharkiv region
In the above salvo, the Russians have shown themselves having a bit of sadistic sense of humor. They hit the NATO terror training hotel, not with anything that would have eradicated the terrorists and trainers. Instead they hit it with a light cruise missile, which made the terrorists run for their lives. It flushed them. The Russians will have watched where they fled to for future targets. I will assume the Russians too aerial footage of this and has been the joyous toasting with vodka for sometime in the leadership circles at the comedy they unleashed.
agtG
