As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I have had enough of the bullshit from the Pentagon and it's press that the Bradley and the Striker are tank killers. NO THEY ARE NOT. They are light armour with weapons that may kill Russian tanks. So will a man with a nuclear weapon, that does not make them something a Russian tank can obliterate first.
I have read a great deal about the F 35 which America has, and the propaganda about how a great of jet it is. No it is not a great jet. What it is is, is a suicide nuclear delivery device for pilots who fly it. It is a first strike nuclear weapon meant to evade Russian defense systems. It is not the dreadnought which it is being championed as.
In the description and analysis below between the F 35 and the Su 35, enters the reality of what Americans Air Force has always been. It does not matter if it is P 51 Mustangs, Corsairs or the infamous Vietnam dog fight of a Mig to an American F 4 Phantom, Americans have a great deal of bulk and power in their machines, while the Russians, Japanese, Germans fly a lighter and more maneuvering craft.
In Vietnam the Mig could out maneuver being lighter, while the Phantom had the power and speed to counteract the Mig. In the end it was an American missile which won the battle. A missile, not the plane.
So read the following with that in mind.
The Su-35’s 4++ generation engine, radar, and weapons package makes it a serious competitor against top US planes, including not only the F-16 and F-22, but Lockheed Martin’s monster $1.7 trillion F-35 Lightning II multirole jet as well. While it is outclassed by the F-35 on stealth and avionics, the Su-35 features superior maneuverability, a higher top speed (2,400 km vs. 1,960 km per hour), and longer range (3,600 km vs. 2,800 km).While they are marketed as stealth fighters, F-35s can be detected using some radar types, including, reportedly, the Su-35’s onboard Ibris-E. Given the F-35’s sleek radar cross section (RCS) of as little as .005m2, the Ibris-E could hypothetically detect it up to 90 km away, which is below the F-35’s ability to hone in on the Su-35 up to 150 km away. However, according to Hellenic Air Force Colonel (ret.) Konstantinos Zikidis, when accounting for maneuverability and countermeasures, such as chaff dispensers or jammers, and "beaming maneuvers" (i.e. flying perpendicularly to the source of a radar or oncoming missile to avoid or complicate detection), an F-35 could be outclassed by a competent Su-35 pilot.
If one adds the following to the F 35 in combat, in the superior Russian S 400 and 500 SAM missiles, then it does not matter what the F 35 has in distance. Saddam Hussein's tanks being T 72s were slower in firing time by 12 seconds, which gave thee American Abrams tank an edge to win. The edge the F 35 has is distance. The SAM batteries Russia has will negate that edge. The F 35 then becomes expensive targets.
Into this mind you, Russia pilots are not Iranian pilots, meaning it does require training. Considering though that even Klaus Schwab is only hiring unvaxed pilots and American attrition in pilots is a real problem, American pilots are not that well regulated or trained. Jews have a better retainment, but they are still flying an F 35 or F 16, and again, the Russian SAMS are in Syria and Iran.
The edge falls not to fighters, but to long distance bombers which America and Russia have as platforms, but in that, there is the reality of Russia has interceptors which will take down American bombers and there is not a production line to replace them as in World War II.
It is this American platform which has been tested for the past several years which is the Achilles Heel to Russia. Mind you, Russia has it's own fail safe in its hypersonic and ICBM missiles to scorch earth the United State with dirty radiation if they lose, but the X fighters are equipment which can hide in space, activate and come at Russia with Rods of God or whatever.
US X-Plane Is The Fearsome Future Of
Unmanned Stealth Fighters
So in this analysis. the Russians in the Su 35 is a superior platform for combat, conventional and nuclear. The Lame Cherry maintains that what this cartel led Pentagon NATO scheme is all about is what they said,' "Weakening Russina", with the advent not of direct war, but a civil war ignited in Russia as the cartel ignited in Kaiser's Germany. That is what this is all about. The war they desire is INSIDE RUSSIA, not outside.
For now the Russians have the superior force, and will continue as there is not production in the West to maintain losses of it's expensive technology. If though these X weapons have attrition or are neutralized by Russia, then Russia with China will not just win, they will dictate terms of annexations in North America and reparations as were foisted on Germany.
Nuff Said
agtG
