As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
It is really digging under the Catholic skin, the Truth that the Universal religion was never founded in Rome by St. Peter. Their propagandists have been publishing rebuttals of the facts, namely that St. Peter mentions he is with the Christians in Babylon.......and as Rome is later spiritually called Babylon, this is the basis of their entire refuting of the facts that St. Peter NEVER SET FOOT IN ROME.
With no Peter in Rome, the Vatican religion, founded up on Vatican or demonic oracle Hill, is a religion which incorporated universally all the occult into Christianity.
It would literally be over 150 years later that a fabricated story of Peter in Rome would be generated by the Vatican.
By the late second century, however, Tertullian could claim that both had been martyred in Rome, Peter crucified like Christ and Paul beheaded like John the Baptist. Early acta were presumably in existence by then and indeed seem to have been expressly mentioned by Tertullian.2
The basis for this "legend" would be in books rejected, even by the Catholic elders and not included in the Bible. One such book, The Acts of Peter, has Peter dueling with Simon Magus who is flying around, literally like Bewitched, and crashes, dies. This literal bullshit also includes Peter fleeing, seeing Jesus outside Rome who says He is going to be crucified a second time there. Peter goes back, gets executed by Agrippa and then appears to a follower of his, and announces Paul will not appear in Rome.
Besides scholars discounting this nonsense as it has not one inkling of an awareness of what Rome really was, this rendition bumps into the reality that Paul was already in Rome and in his letters never says Peter is there, when Peter is supposed to be Pope there.
As we leave flying sorcerers behind, we do return to Simon Magus and an explanation of the reality that he is Peter of Rome.
The term Peter is not Peter as in Simon Petra, the Rock. This Peter is PATOR, as in father or in the stead of Nimrod. Peter was worshiped in Rome and other occult sects. In Rome you have heard his name in the planet JuPETER. Yes Jupiter means the god planet which Rome worshiped.
Near 45 A.D., we find Peter being cast into prison at Jerusalem (Acts 12:3, 4).
In 49 A.D., he was still in Jerusalem, this time attending the Jerusalem Council.
About 51 A.D., he was in Antioch of Syria where he got into differences with Paul because he wouldn't sit or eat with Gentiles. Strange that the "Roman bishop" would have nothing to do with Gentiles in 51 A.D.!
Later in about 66 A.D., we find him in the city of Babylon among the Jews (I Pet. 5:13). Remember that Peter was the Apostle to the CIRCUMCISED. Why was he in Babylon? Because history shows that there were as many Jews in the Mesopotamian areas in Christ's time as there were in Palestine. It is no wonder we find him in the East. Perhaps this is the reason why scholars say Peter's writings are strongly Aramaic in flavor — the type of Aramaic spoken in Babylon. Why of course! Peter was used to their eastern dialect.
At the times the Catholics believe Peter was in Rome, the Bible clearly shows he was elsewhere. The evidence is abundant and conclusive. By paying attention to God's own words, no one need be deceived. Peter was NEVER the Bishop of Rome!
St. Peter had a commission by Jesus, to preach the Gospel to the Hebrews. Paul's commission was to preach to the Gentiles. In one Biblical fact, Paul calls in the Jewish leaders at Rome when he arrives, and they know nothing of Peter, and only have heard of this fringe movement of Christians. If Peter was in Rome before Paul arrived, battling flying men, then these Jews would have been aware of Christ and not dismissed Paul.
All of this matters in the founding of the false church of Rome and Pater or Father Simon, the Father of Rome, not Peter of Rome, and his successor who raised the dead and other things according to legend, which of course never happened with Linus, because there is going to be a last Pope of Rome and the Catholic oracles say that it is Pater Francis, the last Peter of Rome.
The Bible does not speak of this, it only notes the following in that there will be a False Prophet, that is likely this last Pater who is fulfilling that perfectly. There will be an anti Christ who will turn on the Catholic religion with murderous results. The Whore of Babylon is defined as a city which sits on 7 Hills. That is Rome, so the false church or whore is the Vatican.
The Vatican has an entire heresy, based on a lie, that Peter was in Rome. St. Peters is not St Peter's it is St. Paters. The word Pater is father, but it is also the name linked to oracles as in Babel and Delphi. Vaticanus Hill was the site of the oracle hill, that is where the oracle building now sits, named St. Oracle in pagan worship.
These Jesuit storm troopers have invested a great end times effort to prop up their lie about St. Peter as without him, everything else they are becomes exposed as Pater Francis is exposed with his deconstruct of the Catholic religion, to the point of stating that Christians do not need Christ and including sodomite sin.
Nuff Said
agtG
agtG
