As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
The Lame Cherry is in this political season of fraud where come 2025 AD in the year of our Lord, all of our rights will be destroyed more in the convenience of fixing things we are not guilty of, by those who are guilty, it is important not for us now, but for us later, in the remnant which may survive to the time of George Washington's vision of cottages springing up across a dead America again, to know and understand what our Republic was.
I personally relish the intellectual drama of our Constitutional Convention which created America at the inspiration of James Madison. I love the Federalist Papers, as in all of these letters and writings is the debate of how this living document of the Constitution is the hovering wings of Angels over flawed men and that by flawed men it does not become the leviathan which eats us and the world.
In the following, the Lame Cherry is going to take you on an adventure, the intellectual sort which you as an American have hereditary right to. It is not the Supreme Court which decides our futures in law, but it is each of us as we grapple what the words of the Constitution mean for us. That is what Abraham Lincoln as president elect told the people of Indianapolis Indiana, in February 1861 AD in the year of our Lord. Lincoln employed the 20,000 mass of Americans to remember that it was not him, not the people elected or appointed, but that the Union and liberty rested with the People.
As Mr Lincoln left the Wabash train to spend the night at the Bates House, the noteworthy of Indiana and the Lincoln entourage were present. These were all thoughtful people and considerate of facts. War was upon America in secession and everyone knew it.That is why what Mr. Lincoln speaks below raises an insight which I have never been exposed to before, but one which has generated inside of me for years and remained unspoken. Mr. Lincoln scraped in his words to the bare bones of what this was all about as he judged it. It was not about Niggers. It was not about Capitalist exploitation. It was not about Southern domination of the Washington City Government. I ask you to read Mr. Lincoln's words and see the real question and base he formed as no one has ever explained this as Lincoln did, and no one who has propagandized history has ever exposed you to what Abraham Lincoln was thinking.
My children and my brats know that the Lame Cherry if not a Lincoln apologist. He was tyrant and I detest the measures he employed in the holocaust and genocide of the South to restore States to the Union, even weaponizing the Black to terrorize the White.
Yet before all of this, in the words Lincoln spoke there is that intellectual main course to make any thinking mind ponder and debate for it's greatness.
Meet you on the other side.
When men wrangle by the mouth with certainty that they mean the same thing, while using the same words, it perhaps would be as well if they would keep silence.
What to do the words coercion and invasion mean?
Would the marching of an army into South Carolina without the consent of the people,and with hostile intent toward them be invasion? I certainly think it would, and it would be coercion also if the South Carolinians were forced to submit.
But if the United States were merely to hold and retake it's own forts and other property, collect the duties on foreign importations, or even withhold the mails from places where they were habitually violated, would any or all of these things be "invasion or coercion?
Lovers of the Union spitefully resolve to resist coercion and invasion, but their affections seemed thin and pale.
If sick, the little pills of the homeopathist would be too much too large for them to swallow. In their view, the Union as a family arrangement, would seem to be no regular marriage, but rather be a sort of free love arrangement, to be maintained only on passional attraction.
Is there a special sacredness in the assured primary right of a state to rule all which is less than itself, and ruin all which is larger than itself?
I am not asserting anything; but I am merely asking questions for you to consider.
- President Elect Abraham Lincoln.
In reading above, I will provide the key point discussed here, as Mr. Lincoln was attempting to educate the people in power and out, to his judgment of the reality of what was to come and what had come. The Constitution is a Covenant as is a Marriage. It is not a light thing to promise your life for another in service and protection. All of us have now been exposed to the CIA globalist culture rape of the 1960's and the Obama rhetoric which promoted sexual deviance in destroying the key base of all society in the stable family.
In this Lincoln was explaining that what the people who professed to love America, only loved America without all the responsibilities of a marriage in fidelity, sickness and health, poverty and riches, until death ended it all. These people viewed the Constitution as a fling of passion which had no penalties if it was not adhered to.
We have all witnessed the devastation of the orgy of Obama in blowing apart societal structure which Donald Trump has now carved into the Republican Platform in soft aborticides, sexual deviants and removing the Second Amendment. One can not have a stable country of morality with the weapon of orgy raping the future offspring.
So we arrive to Mr. Lincoln's closing summation in true legal written in stone which each of us has to come to terms with.
Is there a special sacredness in the assured primary right of a state to rule all which is less than itself, and ruin all which is larger than itself?
To put this in terms which expand on this, when you took your marital vows, they were absolute. What kind of a marriage would you have if your spouse, began having orgies with all of your neigbhors? What kind of marriage would you have if your spouse started molesting the children? What kind of marriage would you have if your spouse seized your property, took your mail, raised an armed gang against you, and moved other people into your home, and said you did not have anything to say about it?
Now the answer is obvious is the marriage was over and divorce would take place. BUT, understand what Abraham Lincoln's summation was teaching, "Does your spouse have the right to dictate to you, your community, your state, and other states who are keeping their marriage vows, and by doing so does your spouse have the right to destroy the framework of security, the necessary production of Southern cotton for the North, the necessary manufacture of the North for the South, which would bring about the destruction of both of you as outside interests in England, Spain and France would in your weakness appear with troops to not just take your house, but bayonet you as your children were led off in chains to be slaves.
This is the rendering of Federal Law with State's Rights at the core as each is responsible for that one mandate of LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT OF MORAL WORK TO SUSTAIN THE FIRST TWO.
I have always championed the South's right to secede, but what Abraham Lincoln was foreseeing is that when the house divided itself, both houses would become plunder for the same foreign enemies, and both would be exterminated.
This is the base of something which has troubled me for some years and it has to do with something equally worse than secession. America is a nation of 50 states. Yet we have become a people where in most cases 47 states are hostages of 3 metro states. New York takes all of our money and monopolizes it. California has taken that money and our best peoples and created an empire, where their looting has forced us to exist as Californians. The example is California forcing automakers to make a 1500 dollar Mustang in 1965 with all this computer and emissions expense into a 100,000 dollar car which no one can afford. That is a dictatorship and it constantly erodes all of our finances and liberty, whether it is taking lead out of fuel for expensive additives or banning lawnmowers and kitchen ranges for this green scam.
The last state and it could easily be a number four is Chicago commodity monopolies on our food or Texas monopoly of our oil and gas, and all of this plugs into London finance, OPEC oil and Jewish machinations of political fraud.
America has been faced as equal a threat as secession, it is SEIZURE.
The landscape rules of expendable Americans. Blacks are expendable for Latin invaders. Latin invaders are expendable for money laundering. Protestant Christians are expendable in the nuclear arsenal of states from Montana to Missouri as 10 million dead Conservative White People are expendable for 100 million coastal metro dictatorship mongrels.
Mr. Lincoln in his summation did provide us the answer to the questions, and the answer was, that no, New York finance could not loot all of our money. No, California could not enforce an economic and sex pervert dictatorship ruining our lives. No Chicago could not price our food more than we could afford and no, Texas could not keep us from heating our homes, all backed by a foreign syndicate whose interests were erasing and replacing Americans.
All of us can see answer in this, in the abuse of State and Federal in violating our rights. We have been seized by hedge interests in a feudal few making criminals of all of us for breathing.
I fear in one form or another in the Obama Biden rapine or the Trump Vance rapine, will be more of the same in the same factions at the same table, gouging us no matter who is installed.
The reality of this is there is no answer. It comes down to people having to be moral in curbing themselves and not preying on other people. When that is violated, that is the world and America which we are all being thrown to ward a nuclear war crematoria.
For the remnant who survives, this Lame Cherry exclusive will benefit in clarifying the understanding necessary in the seeds of destruction are liberty when it is turned into license.
This is another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
Nuff Said
agtG
