Mein kinder, I would have solved all of this long ago.
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
My appreciation for God has me marvel as over the past years, my children and my brats have had a front row seat to the future. The Holy Ghost provided books for me to read, to Inspire me, and to post projections and analysis of. What amazes me is the very ground which Russia and Ukraine are contesting over, are the battlefields the Reich and the Soviets fought over. The memoirs of two Germans, one a Lancer sniper and the other a Panzer General were a grand insight into what is Ukraine, or the area from the Dan to the Volga, two Lost 10 Rivers, as this a theater of war, and is where Kiev has been genociding Christian Slavs for the London order, and the same tactics and locations are where these battles took place.
Russia interestingly, being informed by the Board, I believe, employed World War I trench tactics which people like Jeff Rense groaned over. Considering that Kiev employed NATO tactics which were the disaster of the Maginot Line in World War I defenses, the Moscow order of battle was correct, because Moscow has a greater vision, in partnering with America who wants to make Europe a colony, and Russia's security is to overthrow these monarchs without crowns in the West, and reach an understanding with Moscow so confrontation ends.
This blog has stated that the Dan River is the objective in this. The following quote is of interest in an American think tank, is concluding what the Russians are maneuvering for in a 25 mile boundary on the West side of the Dan River.
Meet you on the other side.
Russian security is sound, a 25 mile wide artillery boundary on the West of the Dan to keep Kiev from lobbing shells into Western Russian Protectorates.
Russia had a grande strategy in Ukraine. It was never to conquer Ukraine. It was to make Kiev surrender, and only after it had depleted in munitions and money, the Europeans, which would overthrow their regimes and produce the European Right who would make peace with Russia. It is at this point working out as Moscow planned, along with President Donald Trump who knows these Europeans can not manage their own lives, so need to become colonials dependent upon America and supplied by Russia in resources. I would have just wiped out the threat in Ukraine, but that would have moved to a NATO war which Russia did not want to fight as it can not hold Europe.
Everyone in this will be a winner really. Russia will have security. American will not be at odds with Russia, and European children will be taught to behave.
This is in the interest of the United States to have Russia occupy the Dan River drainage, as America monitors resource development without cost, because as in the policy in Korea, America has to hold around 50,000 troops in that small area which is costly to keep the peace. Russia will have to keep deployed an entire army, around 200,000 in size, with aircraft, artillery, missiles, bases to keep these Europeans honest. Belarus is joining with Russia and in this Danite security zone, Ukraine is in a pincer Russia will have to supply, support and pay for a huge army on the Dan, using up resources and young lives lost in productivity. That assists the United States as it gives Russians something to do, and Poland will waste it's resources as it tries to occupy western Ukraine.
Russia in the Dan, means less of Russia to back China or Iran. This is the type of policy which adults produce for America's benefit and security, instead of these endless Bush Obama wars which benefit only the coastal rich in America and London markets.
So Russia will be vulnerable in having troops on the West side of the Dan. Those artillery shells of the 155's are going to cost Russia a fortune for security. Winning a war costs more than losing one, and winning a war brings the perpetual debt of peace.
This is once again another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
Nuff Said.
agtG
agtG
