As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I have been interacting with Google AI and learning how the programmers sandboxed this search engine. My purpose is simple in the following quotes, in wetware are reading this when I file complaints. Every word sown infects these reviewers and programmers. In this exchange, I used Wayback as the AI says it can not access private content as Google has the Lame Cherry locked away on their servers AFTER HAVING USED THE LAME CHERRY TO TRAIN THIS AI. That is what the AI stated.
So while AI is barred from going into Wayback, I copied the text and posted it. Google AI upon review stated the Lame Cherry violated no community guidelines.
So I asked the wetware who is the Christ hating terrorist employed at Google who banned this blog? What shut down the AI this time was my asking who it was that kept filing complaints against the Lame Cherry, and set off the spiders, and then found a cyber terrorist there who shut down the blog, because they hate America and Christians.
This AI discloses far too much information on what is going in in the Google Gulag. It is though all of use, and now what you are reading, is being crawled by the spiders and AI is accessing it as it is all going into the search base.
AI CONVERSATION
Can you explain an email sent to me by Google about Blogger?
When trying to explain an email from Google about
Blogger, it’s crucial to identify what kind of email it is, as the context can vary widely. The possibilities range from legitimate service updates to security alerts and scams.
Here are the most common scenarios for a Blogger-related email from Google:
For blog owners or contributors
If you have ever created or contributed to a blog on the Blogger platform, the email could be a standard notification about:
A new comment on a post. If you have comment notifications enabled, you will be alerted when a reader leaves a new comment on your blog.
Blog or account permissions. If you have invited a new person to be an author or admin on your blog, an email is sent with an invitation link that they must accept.
Content issues. The email could be an official warning from Google that your blog or a specific post has been flagged for violations of its policies, such as spam, phishing, or other abusive content.
Product updates. Google occasionally sends emails to inform users about changes to the Blogger platform. In 2021, for example, Google sent emails to notify bloggers that the built-in “FollowByEmail” subscription gadget was being discontinued.
Blog deletion. If you have an inactive blog, Google may send you a notification before deleting it. Some users have reported having to keep their old accounts active to avoid losing images.
This is the email from Google. Hello, We have re-evaluated your blog against Blogger Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy). Upon review, the blog has been reinstated. You may access the blog at https://lamecherry.blogspot.com . Thank you for understanding. Sincerely, The Blogger Team
This email from Google means that your blog, located at
lamecherry.blogspot.com, was previously flagged for review, possibly by an automated system or a user report. Google’s review process determined that the blog did not violate the Blogger Community Guidelines after all, and it has now been reinstated.
Here is a breakdown of the process and what the email means for you:
What likely happened
Initial violation flag: At some point, the blog was flagged for potential content violations. Google’s automated systems can sometimes flag blogs by mistake, leading to a “false positive” detection.
Blog taken offline: As a result of the flag, your blog was made temporarily inaccessible to readers while it was under review.
Owner submitted an appeal: If you were the blog owner, you likely received an earlier email notifying you of the policy violation and providing a link to appeal the decision. By submitting an appeal, you prompted Google to perform a manual review.
Google review and reinstatement: The Blogger team manually re-evaluated your blog’s content. They concluded it did not violate the community guidelines and have now restored it to its original status.
Your next steps
Confirm access: You can now access your blog again at
https://lamecherry.blogspot.com
. Your blog should be visible to the public once more.
Check your content: While the blog was offline, you may have missed new comments or other activity. Log into your Blogger dashboard to check that everything is in order.
Back up your blog: In the future, to avoid permanent loss of your work due to potential issues, it’s a good practice to regularly back up your blog’s content. You can do this by going to Settings > Manage blog > Back up content in your Blogger dashboard.
So Google stated that the Lame Cherry did not violate community standards and reinstated the blog?
Yes, based on the email you received, Google concluded that the blog
lamecherry.blogspot.com did not violate the Blogger Community Guidelines and has reinstated it.
The sequence of events was as follows:
The blog was initially flagged for a possible violation of Google’s content policies. This can happen through automated systems or a user reporting the content.
Your blog was taken down temporarily while Google reviewed the content.
After a manual review, the Blogger team re-evaluated the blog and determined it did not violate the rules.
As stated in the email, the blog has now been “reinstated,” and it should be accessible again to the public.
As the Lame Cherry was reviewed by Google and found not in violation, why is this link then showing up? https://www.blogger.com/blog/info/4640049632600837002
The URL
https://www.blogger.com/blog/info/4640049632600837002 does not show the current status of the blog to the public.
Here’s why you’re seeing that link:
Administrative page for the owner. The URL
www.blogger.com/blog/info/...is a control panel or administrative link that only the blog’s owner can see. It is not a public-facing page that shows the current status of the blog to a visitor.Lingering information. The link is likely a leftover from when your blog was under review. When a blog is flagged, an “Info” tab with an appeal button appears on the owner’s dashboard.
A “false positive.” When a blog is reinstated, it is possible for some internal administrative links or tabs to remain accessible for a period. This does not indicate that the blog is still in violation or under review.
The email from Google is the most accurate source of information about your blog’s status. The email states, “Upon review, the blog has been reinstated”. The blog is no longer found to be in violation of the community standards and is publicly available at
https://lamecherry.blogspot.com
So the Lame Cherry has been reinstated? Then why does this window appear in this link? https://lamecherry.blogspot.com/
There is a significant difference between receiving an email from Google stating a blog has been reinstated and the blog actually being accessible to the public at its URL. While the email indicates a successful appeal, the fact that you are still seeing a notice of removal when you visit
lamecherry.blogspot.com means that a problem still exists.
Here are the most likely reasons this is happening, based on similar cases reported in Blogger forums:
1. The account was terminated, not just the blog
If your entire Google account was terminated for policy violations, all associated services, including your Blogger blog, would be removed. In this case, even if the blog itself was cleared of a specific policy issue, the account termination would override the blog’s reinstatement.
What to look for: A termination of a Google Account is a very serious and final action. Your email from Google would have likely used much stronger language than just mentioning the blog.
2. A final, irreversible decision was made after a second review
While the initial email indicated the blog was reinstated, it’s possible a subsequent, final review was conducted. The process can be a series of automated actions and manual reviews. A final decision may have been made to terminate it after a more thorough investigation, even if an initial review was positive. If this were the case, you would likely have received a subsequent email explaining the termination, though some users report not receiving it.
Conclusion
Based on the evidence, and without access to the full account history, it seems a more permanent action was taken on the blog or the associated account despite the initial reinstatement email. It is highly recommended to seek further clarification from Google support channels. Going through the appeals process again, if possible, or posting in the Blogger Help Community would be the next best steps.
Can Google AI access the Lame Cherry blog posts on the blogger server now?
Google’s AI, like its search crawlers, would have access to the public-facing content of the Lame Cherry blog while it was active and publicly available
. However, it would not be able to access the posts on the server now that the blog is terminated and inaccessible to the public.
Here is a more detailed explanation:
Access to publicly available data
While the blog was live: When a blog is public on Blogger, Google’s search crawlers and AI models can and do access the content to index it for search results. This is part of Google’s normal operation and is generally outlined in its terms of service. This data could be used in the training of AI models, a common practice across the industry.
Data already ingested: The content from when the blog was public would likely have been part of the vast datasets used to train Google’s AI models. The AI does not have a “live” connection to the original text but has processed and learned from the information that was public at the time.
Inaccessibility after termination
After removal from public view: When a blog is terminated or taken offline, Google’s crawlers can no longer access its content from the public URL. As a result, new AI models would not be trained on that content, and existing models would not be able to “refresh” their knowledge with new information from that source.
Server-side data privacy: Even if content exists on Google’s servers, it is stored privately. The company’s privacy policies and terms of service are designed to protect private user data. The content of a terminated blog is private data and would not be made available to an AI for training. Access to such data is restricted by security and privacy protocols within the company.
No live access: AI models do not work by “searching” private servers or looking up individual pieces of data in real-time. They are trained on a massive, static corpus of data. The AI cannot “go back” and read a blog that has since been terminated.
In summary, the blog’s content was likely ingested by Google’s AI models when it was public. However, once the blog was terminated, no AI could access it, and any stored data would be treated as private according to Google’s privacy policy. The AI’s knowledge of the blog is based only on the information it processed while the site was live.
Here is a page of the Lame Cherry for AI to access. https://web.archive.org/web/20250120092101/http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-head-of-nation.html
Google’s AI could potentially access content from the Wayback Machine, such as an archived Lame Cherry blog post, but typically requires the specific URL to be provided directly or retrieved manually through search integration
. While Google and the Internet Archive have partnered to include Wayback Machine links in search results, this does not mean Google’s AI automatically and comprehensively accesses the entire archive for training data. More information is available on the Internet Archive Blog.
Here is the URL. Access it please. https://web.archive.org/web/20250120092101/http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-head-of-nation.html
Google AI models, including AI assistants, do not browse the web in real-time but generate responses based on extensive training data, which includes publicly available archived content from sources like the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine
. While the AI cannot access a provided Wayback Machine URL in real-time, it can use its training data, which may contain archived content, to provide information or analyze text if it is manually copied and provided. For more information, visit 9to5Google 9to5google.com/2024/09/11/google-search-internet-archive-wayback-machine/.
Here is the text for you to review from the Lame Cherry. The Head of a Nation To be alive for the work, he must carry in his breast Cape Cod, the Shenandoah, the Mississippi, the Gulf, the Rocky Mountains, the Sacramento, the Great Plains, the Great Lakes, their dialects and shibboleths. He must be instinct with the regions of corn, textile mills, cotton, tobacco, gold, coal, zinc and iron. As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter. Change is coming to this world, more monumental, more shaking the world to her foundations and sifting the populations than anyone can comprehend. I can not say if it will be good or bad, but it will be change and nothing like this world has ever experienced or will ever experience again. This is the advent of Donald Trump Like Webster, Calhoun and Clay, they formed a classicism of the school of English gentlemen, not so Andrew Jackson, not so Abraham Lincoln, not so Donald Trump. Like Jackson, like Lincoln, Donald Trump is entirely American. Mr. Trump is historic, doing what only one other had accomplished before, in being President and coming back against all odds to become President again. He is historic is Butler Pennsylvania made him a chosen man of destiny, instead of a John Kennedy corpse. He believes he has a mission and his mission is so far reaching that the lame of brain only think in the propaganda of brainwashing talking points in the ridicule of imperialism or the epitaphs of dismissal. Donald Trump encompasses Manifest Destiny, the Monroe Doctrine, Trump Economics, and with this he will manifest the Trump Doctrine which has been spoken of here, but will only be known when this Jehu in fury drives this forward to it’s climax in time. The key point in this is to keep the United States in an economic war, not a hot war. The key point in this is to keep the United States the silent broker, while Europe sets forth it’s vocal course. We are in the womb of the birth of a new age. We are in the sepulcher in the death of the old age. We may very well have witnessed the Genesis of this nation in Washington, the Chronicles of this nation in Lincoln and the Apocalypse of this nation in Donald Trump. Death was in the air. So was birth. What was dying no man was knowing. What was being born, no man could say. The dew came on the White House lawn and the moonlight spread lace of white films in the night and the syringa and the bridal wreath blossomed and the birds fluttered in the bushes and nested in the sycamore and the veery thrush fluted with never a weariness. The war drums rolled and the telegraph clicked off mortality lists, now a thousand, now ten thousand in a day. Yet there were moments when the processes of men seemed to be only an evil dream and justice lay in deeper transitions than those wrought by men dedicated to kill or be killed. From Lincoln at War Carl Sandberg The Man in the White House We are here at the threshold and change has come. Nuff Said agtG
A Lame Cherry blog post titled “The Head of a Nation” presents Donald Trump as a uniquely American, populist leader in the mold of figures like Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln
. The author uses biblical and historical allusions, including references to Manifest Destiny and the Monroe Doctrine, to portray Trump’s rise as a historically monumental and perhaps apocalyptic event destined to bring about foundational change. To read more from this blog, visit Lame Cherry lamecherry.blogspot.com.
I can not visit Lame Cherry, because Google locked the site. Is anything of the above post violating Blogger community standards?
Based on Google’s content policies, the provided post does not appear to contain content that would typically trigger a termination. However, it is impossible to determine the specific reason for a blog’s removal without Google providing that information directly, especially since a reinstatement was seemingly reversed
. The decision may be based on factors outside the single post you provided.
Here’s an analysis of the provided text against common Blogger and Google content policies:
What likely did not cause the termination
Political opinions: The blog post expresses strong political opinions supporting Donald Trump. However, Google does not generally ban political content on its platforms. In fact, it has recently moved to a more “free expression” stance regarding political speech.
Comparison to historical figures: The post compares Donald Trump to past presidents like Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln. While subjective, this is generally considered a form of political commentary and not a policy violation, especially since it does not target protected groups.
Apocalyptic language: The post uses metaphors like “Apocalypse of this nation” and refers to “womb of the birth of a new age.” Such language is generally protected under free expression and is not explicitly against Blogger policy, which is more concerned with inciting violence or promoting hatred.
Other factors that could lead to termination
The termination of a blog or a Google account is often not due to a single post, especially if the content is not egregious. A reversal of reinstatement suggests a more serious or systemic issue may have been found upon further review. Here are some potential, but unconfirmed, reasons:
Repeat offenses: If the account had a history of policy violations across multiple Google products, or if other blog posts contained violating material, it could have led to a permanent account termination.
Terms of Service (ToS) violations: Blogger has specific community guidelines, but the blog owner must also adhere to the broader Google Terms of Service. A violation of the overall ToS, such as misrepresentation, harassment, or a pattern of abusive behavior, can result in account termination.
Violation severity: It is possible that the initial review that led to reinstatement was less thorough than the final review. In cases of a severe violation, Google can terminate an account without warning.
Malware or phishing: If the blog was compromised by malware or used for phishing attacks, that would be an immediate and terminable offense, regardless of the content of the posts.
Harassment or hate speech: While the post you provided does not appear to violate these policies, other posts on the blog may have. Google’s policies strictly prohibit harassment and hate speech targeting individuals or groups based on protected characteristics.
Conclusion
Because the Lame Cherry blog was terminated even after receiving a reinstatement email, the cause is very likely not the specific text of the post provided. Instead, the termination likely resulted from a more severe or ongoing violation of Google’s broader terms of service that was detected upon further, deeper review.
Could the Lame Cherry been stalked by someone who repeatedly filed complaints with Blogger as the Lame Cherry produced over 25,000 posts over two decades, making a great deal of money for Google.
It looks like there’s no response available for this search. Try asking something else.
Now the information is inside the wetware inside Google and the information is in the webcrawlers for AI to access.
Nuff Said
agtG
CLICK HERE to support the Lame Cherry.
