Saturday, March 7, 2026

The Lying New York Times

 


As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

I was reading the New York Times and other American hating outlets drooling over the strike on a Revolutionary Guard Naval Base in Iraq, in which it is claimed that civilians were killed and discovered in the Times reporting 3 blatant lies.

In reviewing the above photo of damages at this base, there are glaring inconsistencies in the “school” does not match the other sites which are stated to have been bombed. The other sites are all BLACK from sooty fire. This “school” is not black. Second point in this, this “school” is thee only building in this area which was struck from the side. The others were all vertical strikes.

The Times begins with throngs of people searching for the dead. There is a group in the left area which are in the rubble, but the rest of this bunch is milling around.

Images showing extensive damage to the school building were shared by an Iranian rights group soon after, and videos posted by Iranian media and independently verified by The Times showed throngs of people searching through rubble for survivors and victims.

That is the first lie.

The second lie is this “school” was partitioned off from the military base. It was not partitioned off and was part of this base the image proves.

The school at one point was part of the Revolutionary Guards’ naval base, according to satellite images from 2013 reviewed by The Times. Roads had led from other areas of the base to the school building that was struck on Saturday. But by September 2016, satellite images show, the same building was partitioned off and was no longer connected to the base.

The third lie is that there were playgrounds or whatever by this building. One call look at this photo and see there were not any facilities that resembled anything like a recess area. Muslim girls are not known for going around kicking soccer balls.

There were no indications this was a school.

Publicly available historical satellite imagery shows the structure bears the hallmarks of a school, including a sports field and other recreational areas that were added over time.

Review the two photos above. The destruction of this building was from the left. The debris field looks blown outwards. That would indicate a detonation from inside the building.

Furthermore review the top photo in what is to the left of this building with the not matching destruction, there are trees. A Tomahawk missile would have to fly through those trees to hit the target. I believe that at Tomahawk only carries a 200 pound high explosive.

Why this matters is, here is a confirmed US military strike in Syria. If you look at the picture, you see the same small footprint with black soot at the impact sites.

A Tomahawk is not built to plough through concrete as in this “school” and the damage would not resemble this.

I have no idea what the Pentagon is going to find in their investigation. I only know the New York Times is lying along with their Trump hating expert. I know the evidence does not match what is being charged or lied about.

Never trust the turban heads in what they hide where and what human shields or cow shields they hide behind.

FLASH TRAFFIC: Reports Claim U.S. Strike on Suspected Underground Nuclear Site in Iran. Unconfirmed reports claim the U.S. Air Force struck a suspected underground uranium enrichment facility in Bukan, Iran.

According to the reports, the facility was allegedly concealed beneath a dairy company used as a cover operation.

The claims further suggest that several Iranian nuclear scientists were killed in the strike and that the site was completely destroyed


Nuff Said

agtG

CLICK HERE to support the popular girl