As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I was reading this August article featured on the Rense site in the interesting mix of fear porn and jewphobia .While it was Jim Marrs and David John Oates who linked the physical and reverse speech evidence of the Tel Aviv connection to JFK's last adventure in this life.
Meet you on the other side.
“Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies. Yes, you read “three” correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?… You have got to believe, like I do, that all options are on the table.“
Almost immediately, the article became headline news around the country forcing major Jewish organizations like the ADL and AJC to feign indignation, and within a week the US Secret Service had launched an ‘investigation’ into the matter while a teary-eyed Adler appeared on the Atlanta Interfaith Broadcasting network’s cable TV show to disavow his column and explain that he actually held a favorable view of President Obama!
Adler’s straight-talk, shocking though it may seem to some, provides crucial insight into the mentality of God’s chosen people and the candor they often use when speaking amongst themselves.
Whether he knows it or not, Trump, the one-time casino mogul, is dicing with death, playing into the hands of potential Israeli assassins by repeatedly claiming that the US would “completely decimate and destroy” Iran if it ever were to succeed in knocking him off. Quite foolishly, Trump has told journalists he’s “left instructions” to “literally bomb them at levels they’ve never seen before” if such an event were to occur. One can only imagine the frenzied Happy Merchant-style hand-rubbing taking place among members of Netanyahu’s cabinet when they hear remarks like these.
I'm reminded of something Adolf Hitler said. "I tell big lies, because little people only tell little lies and are incapable of telling big lies".
It strikes me in reading the above how much people think in the box by training. It must be a Lincoln. It must be a Kennedy, because that is what actions of others have taught them. Compare the above analysis WHICH IS NOT MINE, it is the other people doing the words not me. Compare with the reality. Did Lincoln's death cause a war? No the war was ending. Did Kennedy's death cause a war? Not in the least. If according to the above that London and J Street bankers did in Lincoln and Kennedy, and no wars occurred with the death of one man, than it ignores that the trade was profiting from changing Lincoln Greenbacks to pure gold and converting American uranium into state of Tel Aviv uranium for their bomb.
Now Franz Joseph getting knocked off started the Great European War, so it can happen, but it is the exception. Lincoln and Kennedy gain objectives, small potatoes compared to the big board.
I will introduce a new thought as these posts are always about to make you think, before Blogger deletes them all.
Echo I need a reference. There was a seer from Europe who said he saw two black boxes or objects over New York City and the city kind of imploded on itself. Who was this?In his highly detailed, chilling visions of World War III and global catastrophes, he described seeing a devastating attack on a major metropolis across the ocean—which researchers have long identified as New York City—involving strange flying objects and a literal implosion. [1, 2]The Specific "Black Boxes" VisionIrlmaier did not name the city directly in his native German, but he explicitly called it the "city with the iron towers" or "the big city with the skyscrapers." In his accounts, he stated:
- The Vision: He saw the city targeted by an airborne strike. He described seeing two distinct objects (often translated from his Bavarian descriptions as flying boxes, dark containers, or black shapes) flying over the water toward the city.
- The Impact: As soon as these objects arrived or struck, he witnessed a catastrophic event where the giant buildings didn't just tip over; they structurally folded in on themselves, describing it precisely as the city imploding or collapsing into itself. []
- The Aftermath: He noted that the ground beneath the city seemed to sink, and a massive cloud of ash, smoke, and dust swallowed the entire landscape, leaving nothing but a giant crater of rubble
In employing logic, on the evidence, if you want a far ranging action to be initiated it would require a big action, you know opposite and equal reaction. You go wetware if you want small objectives. You go big when you want to use the things the wetware operations supplied.
People are thinking small. The projections indicate that the world is moving to big things to accomplish the big Biblical objectives.
Nuff Said
agtG
