I have noticed a great many bloggers now taking up the cause of scorched earth in now "knowing" a number of things in the archive of this blog, but making the incredible mistake of not comprehending or having the ability to differentiate the difference between logical deduction and simple understanding that one can not lump everyone into the same category.
There are huge differences between John McCain and Barack Obama. There are huge differences between Sarah Palin and the Democratic liberal elite attacking her.
In that, I ask people to slow down for just a few hours and get a few facts straight concerning what I have been reading in posts from Devvy Kidd, Patrick Martin, Sheryl Jackson and George Paxinos concerning their opinions on the subject of foreign policy.
I in not in any way am challenging these fine noted citizens, but only seek to convey that there are gaping holes in what they are writing which they would not want.
Firstly, Barack Obama is a Marxist of the Trotskyite branch of communism. This means he believes in perpetual change or revolution. His entire group from Davis, Ayers to Wright have formed in him a Maoist to Black Liberation philosophy which simply means, "legally steal from the people who have bank accounts and then hand out that money for votes to people who are not working".
John McCain is a Teddy Roosevelt Republican. This means he is for a strong military to keep peace, but if war is necessary to wage it deliberately. On the domestic issue he will advocate a balance of humane protection for all including illegals while still using them and resources to the capitalist's gain for the benefit of America.
Sarah Palin is a Reaganite. She believes in cleaning up messes by not war, but by economic warfare. In that as this blog advocated as a new policy a year ago, Sarah Palin believes correctly when America is not buying Russian and Middle East oil that then they will have no money to make war against America.
On the domestic front she believes in production, production and more production which creates wealth empowering individuals so they can care for themselves exactly as Benjamin Franklin with Adam Smith advocated.
One can not just toss people into camps and scorch the place as they all want war or when they have policy one does not agree with speak of tossing the entire group out as that is incorrect.
In this, I have read of the current smear that Sarah Palin wants "God's War" or that she is not a fundamentalist Christian.
As this is the smear using the Bible, I will note what the God of the Bible did. For reasons of disease, spiritual darkness (yes people in their DNA can indeed become so much an enigma to God that they will produce as human prone to the demonic), God exterminated numbers of people. He at one point wiped out all but Noah's family as the physical and spiritual corruption was so complete of people.
The Jesus of the Old Testament is termed often the Angel of the Lord. Joshua met Him carrying a sword and Abraham met Him as the Priest King of Salem, all instituting His Warrior Priest King office.
Jesus is predicted to return as the Warrior King at Armageddon.
Sarah Palin is a Christian of the Holy Spirit part of the Church. She knows fully well the difference between secular wars and spiritual warfare which people struggle with. Her invoking God brings with it Lincoln's "better angels of our nature" and not the smear being leveled at her.
Gov. Palin's view is Muslims, Russians, Chinese etc... are all God's children as she is. She knows the difference between corrupt systems harming people and attacking America and the people like in the Warsaw Pac held in enslavement.
She bases her view on Christian belief that God's will directs the best outcome and not that these are God's wars.
For the actual quote Gov. Palin requested in people to pray which ABC's Charlie Gibson took out of context and too many other commentators trusting Gibson's lie:
quote: "Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right; also (pray) for this country; that our leaders, our national leaders are sending U.S. troops, U.S. Soldiers out on a task that is from God."
Anyone can read from that Gov. Palin plainly stating, America should pray that God is leading this nation and that it is not any flawed leader sitting in the White House.
Gov. Palin stated she was attempting to invoke Abraham Lincoln in American history.
John McCain as has been explained here is an American Secularist. He believes in himself as a citizen under God's direction as Washington, Jefferson etc... all believed in their love of the religion of America.
Mr. McCain in Roosevelt doctrine will strike when he deems necessary, but in striking do it to achieve a peace on American terms. Peace being the factor via swift victory.
I have noted that Bush policy has been for America to withdraw from the Middle East and is placing an Eastern European buffer between America and Russia with a containment of China.
I want people to understand this point as George Bush in his policy has shifted from what was the new communist convert "neocon" philosophy of intervention. Bush policy has evolved to a raiding the enemy to disrupt them, for America to withdraw much in Patrick Buchanan's isolationist Republican sect and in forward bases keep a Eurasian World War in Eurasia and not in an American invasion.
Mr. McCain is attracting the remaining "neocons" (I dislike the word as it is a racial political slur by communist Jews against Jews who are strong on defense.) John McCain though in his public statements is going to implement the raider policy of massive hits, special forces raider hits in specific targets to achieve elimination policy and not be lured into nation building or using the US military to overthrow governments like Iraq.
(It is vital to understand that Bush 41 had in place a coup to overthrow Saddam and Bill Clinton axed it for an oil skimming operation where all the American assets were murdered. There should have never been an Iraq, but as there is one it must be stabilized and America is leaving it except for the massive forward bases.)
Mr. Obama is of the Brzezinski / Carter policy on war which states one bribes enemy states to become friends and then carries on regional wars to get at their problem in China and Russia to destroy them.
The policy in pure form is that Eurasia is to self implode after enough leveraging in their own war in which America then sticks in the last thrust. It is a bloody scenario with America face to face with Russia and China. American cruisers sitting in Russian controlled Georgian ports bow to bow with Russian frigates.
Pat Buchanan summed it up best in the President of Georgia didn't listen to US advice (meaning he was listening to some other nation's advice who had a large presence there which fled after Russia counter struck) and now the US is forced to draw the line in regrouping Georgia so Russia will not be tempted to over extend.
Russia currently has an immense economic problem in it's stock market collapsing. Oil will drop to around 75 dollars a barrel in the next few months. These constrictions are all meant to put massive pressure the Eurasians.
Russia does not want a hot war and it does not want a cold war with America. It is learning that it's proxy wars are not working out against America. It will regroup for new covert policy, but in Obama policy he will increase the friction so it will mean a Eurasian World War.
This is vital to understand in Gov. Palin's policy is to keep America out of war by forward stationing to control the implosion.
John McCain's policy is raider strikes to kill problems and keep America at a safe distance.
Barack Obama in his reopening the draft is stating he is going to expand the war with American troops stationed in the hot zones which will erupt into a world war with America involved.
As in Franklin economics John McCain and Sarah Palin adhere to Milton Friedman's foreign policy for the US military. Freidman is thee father of the all volunteer US military.
That doctrine states a highly trained US military of skilled small numbers utilizing technology to defeat enemies with massive hits.
This too is important to comprehend that McCain via Friedman via Bush 43, seven years ago enacted a policy which prepared America for the advent of a Eurasian war. For the reality, America and the free world can not produce enough bullets, munitions or soldiers to fight the hordes of Asia. It would bankrupt the United States, leave America without any metal resources and literally kill 90% of the male breeding population.
This is what was behind the micro nuclear warfare development in a policy to save America from a winning a war, but being destroyed.
If one visits Korea, one can find the need to not get into a shooting war with the Eurasians as our artillery slaughtered masses of Chinese until our own Soldiers were incapable to fight in seeing the slaughter, whereby they ran out of shells and were overrun as the Chinese kept coming.
Mr. Obama is advocating a policy of exposing numbers of our American citizens to this slaughter from which this nation will not recover.
Mr. Obama is not going to be dropping H bombs on Eurasia as some have now jumped to the conclusion as this blog had mentioned would be a scenario it would evolve to under him. Mr. Obama though will place American troops into slaughter, whereby screaming American relatives will demand "something be done" just like they demanded Bush 43 do "something" and Mr. Obama without Soldiers will in turn be forced to use as he has promised to gut the US military for his domestic programs, the only option left except defeat and that will be H bombs on Eurasians which will be counter struck by nuclear missiles on American cities.
There is a vast difference between Sarah Palin in forward bases which China or Russia would never dream of hitting, because of the nuclear response from America with the raider strikes of American troops in and back to carriers or fire bases of John McCain and the literal positioning of US troops in hot zones where their being slaughtered as Russian troops were in Georgia will demand a US invasion.
An American nation can "ignore" as Lincoln did during the Civil War British meddling when it is just people detained or merchandise seized which would occur in US bases for example in Saudi Arabia under their control seized by Russia or even stockpiles seized by them in Italy if Italy joins a new central European group, but the US can not ignore a brigade of troops slaughtered in Georgia placed there by Obama when is adviser stated that Georgians were Americans too.
Too many people are jumping to the end scenario in all cases without understanding the political nature of each candidate and the policy mode will bring about the cause and effect.
To leave Iraq or Afghanistan now would be inhumane as inhuman as Colin Powell for the globalists deemed to occupy those nations for profit against Bush intended and neocon policy. America can not be seen blowing things up and then leaving a defenseless people to be slaughtered by various Islamocommunists who will then control 2/3rds of the world developed oil supply with full intent on toppling the fascists of Saudi Arabia to gain 3/4's.
That is the Eurasian version of economic warfare to take control of the world.
The United States must control American interests, work for a way to assist in Iraq becoming the Japan of the Middle East in power bringing other Muslim states into a secular Islam so they will deal with their own affairs while America reverts to the Franklin past of production and industry to regain national secure strength.
The alternatives are Obama's slaughtering of US troops and the abandonment of the Muslim peoples to religious slaughter by communist genocide. That is not policy and is unacceptable to any person.
Economic strength is what McCain Palin deem the immediate national security to fight American conflicts to keep America secure from having to engage militarily.
In closing, Americans need to be engaged in this political system not now as agitators or anarchists, but Americans and that means in voting.
Some ask who to vote for and most will waffle on the issue, but in setting this record straight on who John McCain, Sarah Palin and Barack Obama are, I will invest the time to explain the candidates.
Ralph Nader is a business management type like Bob McNamara of Vietnam War fame. He would excel at being an under secretary of the Treasury looking out for American worker's advocacy, but he would be a stunned stick in the mud as the American economy collapsed and the Eurasians danced around him like they did around Jefferson and Madison when they let the military lapse.
Bob Barr, is a resolute American, but like this lower group of candidates is an egomaniac. He could deal with foreign affairs in a brusk manner and like Ron Paul toss the economics back to the people causing a massive implosion of the economy as the American economy is so fascist (government and big business controlled in definition context) that it could not operate if these key segments were removed in pure economics.
Cynthia McKinney, God bless her, is an American who knows there is a problem, but going green is running to the problem which is a movement run by the Eurasian communists and European banking converts she rightly rails against.
She made huge mistakes in information by which she lost credibility and her career. Slash and burn does not work on the world stage no more than bomb and burn does.
Chuck Baldwin, I have absolutely no time for no matter if his policies are grounded in the Constitution for the simple reason, I'm not about to tell people to vote for a "pastor" who was telling the world he judged George Bush not a Christian as Bush did not fit Baldwin's fatwa.
That kind of rhetoric is what America threw off in the Church of England in 1776 and is fighting in Muslim nations today.
You can call George Bush names, draw horrid cartoons of him, deem him geniusly stupid, but the line draws on heaven and hell to God's judgment and not Mr. Baldwin, because his edict of last year is the edict of 2009 when Devvy Kidd writes something bashing him and he terms her a satanist who is then thrown in prison.
Barack Obama, obviously as stated is a Marxist and his policy will cause war which could develop into nuclear war which this 10 year old can not deal with as his economic policy will cause a depression.
Joe Biden is a thug who is a nice guy to have a beer with, but as he is being blackmailed now over having Lawrence Sinclair arrested by Hillary Clinton, he would be a disaster of fudging policy like Bill was with Hillary bouncing lamps off his head which caused this entire mess the body politic is debating.
John McCain currently is America's best hope for a firing line in Eurasia which will not spread as readily the US mainland.
He is a democratic socialist with capitalistic tendencies which will require monitoring in forcing a new illegal policy which I have been promoting in mandating US foundations be forced to invest that propaganda money into northern Mexico to provide a buffer zone of jobs for Mexicans and save Mexico from imploding, as these new middle class Mexicans will then be buying American goods in a balance of trade.
This is why Sarah Palin is important in being a Conservative who is production oriented and is intent on new ways to solve problems. She with Cindy McCain, as John McCain listens to strong women and picks them will assist him in controlling his fervency.
As America has to ride someone, it must at this juncture be McCain.
I offer this that a socialist democrat is not the best choice, but in this venture Conservative are not going to allow Mr. McCain the free policy hand Mr. Bush had.
Conservatives can and do control the people of their party whether it is a 70 year old grabbing Karl Rove in New Hampshire shaking him over gun ownership to spanking George Bush on Supreme Court nominations.
Conservatives fully understood that Bush in his record spending was taking all the money Democrats were using to buy votes for themselves, but there are better ways and better policy can be advocated.
Advocacy is the word in this that I would hope the bloggers above would join in, instead of this incessant tearing down of people without offering any solutions that will stand up.
I stick my neck out by actually advancing policy and reasoning in why candidates are not the right choice and how certain candidates can be influenced to bring about the best possible policy for the American Republic.
I will state again in closing that it was my advocacy which started pushing for a strong Conservative woman on the McCain ticket. I hammered it for months and the people who I knew would read it picked it up in conversation. I picked the noted examples of Lynn Cheney, not because she was perfect but she was all there was as Condi Rice was not wanting any part of this she was stating.
McCain chose correctly and I got snotty emails from "Conservatives" who were gung ho over socialist Mike Huckabee.
In the same light, this blog informed Barack Obama, he needed to pick Maria Schriver for the complete reason I knew Sarah Palin was coming on the stage when all the experts were looking to those milk toast guys in the GOP.
Obama screwed up and I thank God, he did not get the information and instead showed how inept he is at anticipating the battle in thinking he had to counter McCain, but instead had to counter McCain's choice.
In none of this do I even assume I speak from the Mount. When I get things right, that is God's doing and when I plunder on in a blog which was designed to be my venue for my personal views working out a better way for America that can be improved upon, then those failings are my own.
I advocate a better America though for Americans to make them wealthy, moral, secure and able to provide for themselves. A nation like that is at peace internally and is too strong so it is not attacked externally.
I' m unlike most people in this as I do not make one cent in this. I do this as it is a commission I uphold for my beloved Republic. I'm a librarian of perpetual thought cataloging material which I offer to students as a teacher to think out of the box for solutions as anyone can tear down a nation, but it is the husbandry of producing a better nation which this garden requires for a new generation.
Certainly I have been shooted over a little bit. I have faced a wonderland which most people die from. I survive and the forces arrayed know some of me and the cartel above know Whose I am.
I caution people in links they read to try them all, because I see far too many "links" which are literal lies like ABC has been exposed in in the Gibson propaganda about Sarah Palin. I informed people from the beginning they had edited her tape horridly on purpose cutting things out.
The link below is a Newsbusters story just showing how much they cut out of Sarah Palin's complete answers.
She wants better neighborly relations with Russia and not antagonistic ones as Gibson sliced the digital to lead one to believe.
People have to comment on the Truth. Yes they also have to step back and talk to God before they start ranting on subjects, then leave things sit for a bit, review them and then see the holes in what they are stating.
They have to understand that most of the media is lying to them in the quotes they are going after various people with.
Yes I'm sticking up for Sarah Palin, because this is the most foul attack on her in now the media is editing out her words and cutting answers in half.
That is enough today in noting the difference between apples and oranges.
agtG
Newsbusters exposes Gibson's smear of Gov. Palin
