Say for a moment you are a presidential candidate surrounded by thugs and you have two homosexual males in Lawrence Sinclair telling about your sex and dope acts and you have a jealous lover in Donald Young who just happens to have sympathy for Mr. Sinclair, and, Mr. Young ends up dead...........and the National Enquirer comes calling.Now the story is starting to spread and thug David Axelrod really messed things up in only inspiring Mr. Sinclair to become more vocal, what on earth do you do?
Perhaps as when you were running for Senate and your white opponent in Illinois was wiping the floor with you for a certain defeat, your Axelrod leaked to the press court documents about your opponent's divorce knowing it would sink him........that maybe you just might put it to the National Enquirer you have a bigger fish for them to chew on if they in return ignore the Donald Young murder and the Lawrence Sinclair story.
You might even in exchange tell them that if they keep you informed on what Mr. Sinclair is telling you, like the New York Times was phishing for information that you will not only provide the story in a quid pro quo, but also give the logistics on how to skin the big fish right before the Democratic National Convention.
Would that not seem from historical factual operations in the Obama campaign and literal events which occurred before the DNC in Denver in which John Edwards was sexposed in public, and that in police terms, who could get the Enquirer to go silent and at the same time eliminate the one person who was a problem for the Obama camp, in that is what exactly happened.
In how these blackmail games occur, someone high level has a conversation with John Edwards informing him with maybe a photo that they would hate to see his adultery come to light if he stayed in the election, especially considering his wife is battling cancer and that little baby he fathered is crying for a daddy.
Edwards bows out gracefully and expects to fulfill his role in the DNC at Denver.
The Obama camp though has already mounted him for the National Enquirer in providing personal data which begs the question in just exactly how did the National Enquirer know where to look for the bottle blonde, what hotel exactly to be waiting at, what time to be there and knowing that John Edwards was going to be there for a sexual meeting.
Speaking for people like Sarah Palin, myself, a host of bloggers who had their emails sorted through, deducting that even Joseph Farah of World Net Daily had to have been set up by the Obama camp in their knowing what his emails to phone calls were saying, coupled with the reality that Jeff Rense's main server was being tagged and his email was being gated, censored and sent on to him edited as one article I sent was, only having highlighted the part of people observing him using the Kroll system in California...........does not the deduction seem elementary that the Obama people have been into numbers of people's personal data and they were feeding the National Enquirer this information.
Barack Obama and David Axelrod appear to be the National Enquirer's source and the Enquirer for that source squelched a story in the promise of greater dirt which will be fed to it when a President Obama gets his hands on all those FBI files floating about.
The National Enquirer should answer just exactly how they have been operating in the Barack Obama campaign as stories right up their alley have not been appearing about him. That means they are protecting him as a source.
One would hope the National Enquirer would actually break this story on itself to reveal the filth of leftist politics consuming it's own using the cancer ridden body of a woman to get elected to the White House by destroying her husband.
That is the story National Enquirer and it is thee Pulitzer Prize story as you have recorded conversations of the Obama camp, the deal agreed to and the information which was fed to you.
National Enquirer don't wait for a Phil Berg or money fraud case you will not get credit for. Use your information and be the Bob Woodward bringing down high crimes in the highest of political cases.
Obama minds want to know National Enquirer...........you have the Obama campaign exactly where you want them.
So what is more reprehensible America?
A husband screwing around on his cancer ridden wife, because he is a weak sap?
or
An Obama screwing over a woman battling cancer, destroying her husband, all so he can win an election?
Come on National Enquirer stand up and do the right thing and write the story.
agtG 255
