This blog responds to Mr. Krugman's use of 9 11 to get attention in bold letters.
The Years of Shame
Is it just me, or are the 9/11 commemorations oddly subdued?
What is it you expect Mr. Krugman in mourning of thousands of American dead? Obama voters fainting? Perhaps cheerleader Obama screaming at the crowds as he did Congress in "PASS THIS BILL!" or were you considering perhaps some elephants, half naked circus girls and maybe a booth with Michelle Obama as the "bearded lady" to give this all a more festive mood?
Actually, I don’t think it’s me, and it’s not really that odd.
Yes it is you Mr. Krugman and you sir really are odd.
What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. Te atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.
Yes what happened after 9 11 was extremely shameful in Nancy Pelosi and all liberals preyed upon Cindy Sheehan, a mother who was mentally ill over the death of her son, as an example, to use her as a battering ram to regain Congress.
It is shameful that a Times writer can not even use SPELL CHECK to find mistakes in not putting an H in their THE, as perhaps your few lines of diatribe lunacy was taking you away from your really important Obama events today on September 11.
Where is your evidence Mr. Krugman that Mr. Bush and company "cashed in", where have they made on penny on this attack? Or is it Mr. Krugman even today you are donating all your money like you have in 9 11 related columns to the people in need from this Islamic wars on America.......or is it you cashing in?
But then your anti Semite racist head rears itself in "new conservative Jews" are the real problem with 9 11. How is it that Jews are a problem Mr. Krugman?
Could you pull out your Goebbels manifesto and explain how Jews are the problem, and then explain how the Jews version of striking back at Islamic terrorism is different from "your right reasons" for fighting wars.
Please Mr. Krugman explain this as your Mr. Obama made it his mantra about "righteous wars" and no one has ever explained this to Americans in how Mr. Obama murdering Khadaffi children and stealing African oil is righteous while Mr. Bush placing Hussein into Iraqi courts for justice and leaving all Iraqi oil in the Iraqi people's hands, is your idea of Mr. Obama being right and Mr. Bush being wrong?
A lot of other people behaved badly. How many of our professional pundits — people who should have understood very well what was happening — took the easy way out, turning a blind eye to the corruption and lending their support to the hijacking of the atrocity?
Name the pundits Mr. Krugman please, and please give examples of your blanket charges. Where is this corruption which are crimes. Have you taken this to Eric Holder or are you covering up felonies Mr. Krugman?
Where was 9 11 hijacked to Mr. Krugman? Please tell us, in how was the removal of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein all linked to al Qaeda, but covered up in dismissing WMD's found and training for crashing planes into the Twin Towers in Iraq, just where was this use of your word HIJACKED, which is slapping the living family members in the face with their dead family members, in your most reprehensible "liberal conscience", just how was all of this hijacked?
Is not hijacked more fitting for your Mr. Obama and yourself in spitting hatred on this 9 11 day and Mr. Obama turning 9 11 into a communist organized day of people working in soup kitchens?
The answer is yes for your liberal conscience Mr. Krugman.
The memory of 9/11 has been irrevocably poisoned; it has become an occasion for shame. And in its heart, the nation knows it.
The problem is Mr. Krugman is you held the vial and your Mr. Obama opened the arsenic cap. The Times has lied to Americans and assisted in installing this undocumented Obama shredding the Constitution.
The problem is Mr. Krugman that it was Mr. Obama who cheated America out of healing in making the murder of Sheik bin Laden's corpse a political event to deflect Donald Trump and Dr. Jerome Corsi in the Birther issue.
It has been all about Mr. Obama thumping his chest and the now cover up of the murdered Team Six SEALS after more lies from this regime and more of your cover up, as you fester in your 10 year old glitch of, "If only 9 11 had happened under Bill Clinton's watch, then we could all be celebrating it!"
9 11 did take place under Mr. Clinton, Mr. Krugman, the Twin Towers were first attacked. The USS Cole was bombed. The US embassies had open season on them. TWA Flight 800 was shot down and Mr. Clinton and Mr. Clark covered up the attack as they didn't want to deal with Iran, and yes Mr. Krugman, 9 11 was due to Clinton compartmentalizing the intelligence community under Jamie Gorelick, so his crimes of bribes from Saddam Hussein via Marc Rich would not be uncovered.
I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons.
Censorship is the norm at the Times Mr. Krugman, so of course do not even allow liberals to castigate you in this Age of the Obama abyss for your being the poster boy for "liberal conscience".
Note to Mr. Krugman: Sir your mind is warped, your heart seared, there is no Truth in you. You are without conscience and a most disgusting ejaculation of all that is Obama NeoProg manifested uncaring, uncompassionate and inhumane thought.
agtG