I would like some advice on my man boobs........
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
There is a necessary fight being waged by the Executive to restore Presidential control over the Executive in agencies which are not complying with the President's Authority. The Lame Cherry maintains the solid legal standing in WHEN YOU PUT MONEY INTO ANYTHING YOU OWN IT, so these agencies like the African whatever refuse to comply as "independent", there is no such thing when they are taking tax money.
The Constitution has ADVISE and CONSENT. This has been abused by the Legislative, as none of it says, "bitch at appointees for weeks in grandstanding and then vote against them". There was a time in the Senate when most people nominated never even appeared before the Senate and the Senate consented. ADVISE means to suggest what is a direction of appointments and then vote to consent when the President nominates.
None of this includes what would be termed non cabinet agencies. This has been extended to things which did not exist in 1789, from the FBI, CIA to whatever. Congress has the Authority in voting on military appointments, cabinet appointments and judges. Otherwise they have no Authority, PERIOD.
Given the President’s inability to supervise the activities of the Board-less USADF, he has inherent authority to designate an acting Chairman of the Board. The Federal Vacancies Reform Act [FVRA] excludes the USADF because its members are confirmed by the Senate and sit on a board “composed of multiple members” which controls a “Government corporation.” 5 U.S.C. 3349c(1). But the FVRA also appears to exempt the USADF from the requirement that the FVRA serve as the “exclusive means for temporarily authorizing an acting official.” Id. 3347(a), 3349c. Additionally, the USADF’s organic statute does not include any mechanism for the President to designate acting officials. See 22 USC 290h. Therefore, the President currently has no way of ensuring the agency is running, or complying with his executive order, unless he directs an temporary official using inherent authority under Article II.
On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, Peter Marocco has been temporarily appointed acting chairman and board member of the USADF.
The President as Chief Magistrate has sole Authority to appoint as many lesser Magistrates to enforce the law as he chooses. What is not allowed is Congress or the Supreme Court to interfere with appointments of inferior officers. The Supreme Court was completely infringing on the Executive when it made a decision stating anyone making a decision was a "officer of the United States".
The remedy required in this is simple, and as President Trump has not yet moved. He is Commander in Chief and Chief Magistrate. The President appoints whoever he chooses in inferior offices and if the Courts or Congress attempt to interfere, the President dispatches the Provost Marshal and informs the perpetrators that the US military with guns will appear and haul their asses into Tribunals for trial and execution on insurrection charges. The reason the Founders placed the police and military in the hands of the President was to order it from time to time to go haul ass on the Legislative and Judicial, when it tried overthrowing the Nation.
Article 2 Section 2 Clause 2 | Constitution Annotated
In the United States, "advice and consent" is a power of the United States Senate to be consulted on and approve treaties signed and appointments made by the president of the United States to public positions, including Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, officers of the armed forces, United States attorneys, ambassadors, and other smaller offices.
It is past time of the nuance in this, and time for the President in his Constitutional Authority to DOGE by military arrest these insurrectionists in the Legislative and Judicial.
Nuff Said
agtG