Thursday, March 17, 2011

For Help, Press F1


The Obamite David Brooks of the New York Times or wherever he is festooned, has been making the rounds hawking this strange book he concocted in some psychological fiction which is like Tolkien crossed with Sig Freud on a bad drug trip...........

Ok I have to go into this as Charlie Rose had Brooks on and was just wet in his panties over this odd book that honestly is insane, as it is so anal in creating characters based on profiling that it just is flat ass not interesting.
Brooks writes like he has 4 pebbles on his walk, and he can discern these rocks intentions by feeling the lumps on his head.

Speaking of which, I wanted to address in this Brooks appearance on Pole Joe and Knockers Brzezinski's show on Marxist Sexist NBC cable.
Brooks I finally figured out why he is so nuts for Obama, because some talking head inquired of Brooks who his genius of the ages was, and of course Pebble Brain Brooks picked dear leader, B. Hussein.

The reasoning of Brooks was just insane, because his reason for picking Obama is Obama is insane.

Brooks stated that he adored Obama, because Obama has so many personalities that he engages subjects from each one, and what made Obama superior was in having so many personalities that he never was ever all the way committed to any decision, as Obama never makes up his mind completely.

To translate this psychologically, Brooks said Obama is like the 400 faces of Eve in he is a fractured paranoid schizoid. Added to this, Brooks said Obama can not make up his mind, in other words he has committal issues.

To put that in real terms, it is like Obama is porking Mrs. Ed in bed, but Obama will never put the bony pony all the way in, because Barry is whispering a blonde might come in, while Bearick is whispering a teenage girl might come in which Obama can trade Bobama for, while Barack is whispering Reggie Love might come in for a floss, while BH is hoping Arafat's pedophile will come in with a little boy, while B. Hussein is hoping that a goat might come in............and you get the point.
This is David Brooks reality in Brooks adores Obama, because he is a multiple personality with committal issues.

Fact is both of these two should be committed for being nuts.

What strikes me in diagnosing this, is why in hell Brooks and this bunch are nuts. Then it came to me these folks like Ann Coutler are f*cking nuts for Obama.
Coulter is a closet Obamite, so she can't come out and admit her jungle fever like Pegs Noonan with a tab job at Murdoch's WSJ. So she prowls around growling at Birthers in not admiting she is in lust with BHO in voting for him.

Coulter though never says Barry is brilliant. Brooks though like these deluded few refuse to even see the obvious in how meatheaded Obama is. Barack Hussein Obama is a fry cook at best, who can follow orders behind the grill, and if that teleprompter is not there, Obama is incapable of any thought other than dithering awaiting orders from the cartel.

Brooks though just lusts for Obama in his focus is on Obama's pants........as in the crease in Obama's jeans according to Brooks who stated that is what captivated the Dave.

These are Obama's Sodomites in closet and not noticing Obama's big ears, stuttering or nicotine stained teeth or wart on his nose, but focusing on Obama's pants, seems to point to an arousal factor in Brooks, as Brooks was on his knees examining Obama's crease in this theory.
Yes this is the Times Tom Friedman playing the back nine with Obama, Charlie Gibson with his shirt open with Barry and Lawrence Sinclair doing the limbo drive with Obama.

What is the difference though that Lawrence Sinclair did not come under Obama's spell while Gibson ruined his career for Obama musk and Brooks is still babbling on like a closeted Karl Rove over George W. Bush in man lust?

We find the answer in this profiling in what Lawrence Sinclair was discussing in a question afforded him in code on a White only radio program, which basically asked if Lawrence Sinclair swallowed.
That would be a 10 cc protein ejaculation in the back of a limo in felating Obama. Mr. Sinclair laughed and said, "NO!"

Ah now there is the rub in this..............

When David Brooks was in contact with Obama checking out Obama's crease, did David Brooks swallow?
Is this a nature which it is not just the demonic musky scent of stinky Obama giving fainting crowds euphoria, which indeed has worn off............that when one swallows Obama seafaring men in white, does this concoction provide a "bliss", an Obama high, a Bearick drunk and a Barry stoned on such a good trip that as love is blind, that an ejaculated into Brooks mouth is an Obama potion 69 which has so dulled David Brooks that his crazy love for Obama is equal to George Will's lunatic hate for Sarah Palin?
In other words, crazy is as crazy does, and how does a lunatic recognize another lunatic as being mad, when both lunatics think they are sane by how crazy they are both acting?

David Brooks goes on national cable and diagnoses Obama as nuts, and that is why Obama appeals to him as a genius. If anyone gave Brooks' diagnosis for anyone in the military, anyone in law enforcement, anyone in fire rescue, anyone in the medical profession of having multiple personalities who can not make up their mind, they would be discharged or their license revoked immediately.

These maniacs for Obama are maniacal now. Nothing will phase them as nothing does phase them as some elixir of Obama has them so hooked on the dope Obama is, that obvious insanity is what is appealing to them in the excuses they make for this crank Obama.

David Brooks belongs in a mental institution, and there is room as John Hinkley is out and about, as David Brooks is a sycophant delusional who is worse than Einstein's definition of nuts, in David Brooks doesn't expect a different outcome each time from Obama, David Brooks expects the crazy outcome from Obama and considers the Nutty Professor from Kenya as rational.

agtG