As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I really believe the fate of Attorney General William Barr, will seal the fate of America, for whatever happens to the Attorney General, will happen to America.
His words recorded at this moment are an echo of the words spoken by former CIA Director William Colby, before his assassination, in stressing the necessity that Americans have to trust the system of government, or there will not be any nation at all.
There has been for sometime in the United States a continued manipulation of it's institutions by foreigners and the wealthy financiers to both degrade the United states financially, morally and as a race, in murdering off that race by contracted diseases and war.
It began with the Civil War, moved to the World Wars, the counter culture, the cultural wars, Obama and is in it's final stages.
William Barr's words haunt prophetic, as an American he is informing us that he is making his final stand. He expects not to survive this, and he expects his epitaph will toll an unflattering dirge for him. He seems aware that he is among the transitional men of history who lost in their passing. Without any disrespect to the Attorney General, he is an Oliver Cromwell or an Adolf Hitler, who knew when the forces arrayed against them prevailed, history would never let them be forgotten for the threat they were, just as General George Custer and General George Patton were a threat to those forces who have brought the world from the shining city on a hill to a debt ridden slum.
The Lame Cherry admires Attorney General William Barr as an American. There are few of them left and only William Barr is still speaking out, despite the consequences.
Below are the words of the Attorney General and what he knows what he is attempting to bring to Justice is the snake eating the tail.
William Barr dishes on what Huber, Horowitz, and Durham are investigatingAttorney General William Barr gave his clearest explanation yet of the various "investigations of the investigators" being…Washington Exa
New York Maga
Robert Mueller's statements did not reflect the views of the Justice Department.
I think it's important that in this period of intense partisan feeling not to destroy our institutions. I think one of the ironies today is that people are saying it's President Trump shredding our institutions. I really see no evidence of that. From my perspective, the idea of resisting a democratically-elected president and basically throwing everything at him, you know, is really changing the norms on the grounds 'we have stop this president.
That's where that shredding of our norms and institutions are occurring.
“I think the activities were undertaken by a small group at the top which is one of the- probably one of the mistakes that has been made instead of running this as a normal Bureau investigation or counterintelligence investigation. It was done by the executives at the senior level, out of headquarters.
Like many others regarding intelligence activities, I had a lot of questions. I went in and got no answers that are satisfactory and, in fact, probably have more questions and some of the facts I've learned don't hang together with the official explanations of what happened. That's really all I will say, things are not jiving.
Republics have fallen because of Praetorian Guard mentality where government officials get very arrogant, they identify the national interest with their own political preferences and they feel that anyone who has a different opinion, you know, is somehow an enemy of the state.
And you know, there is that tendency that they know better and that, you know, they're there to protect as guardians of the people. That can easily translate into essentially supervening the will of the majority and getting your own way as a government official.
Saying it is "part of the craziness of the modern day that if the president uses a word it all of a sudden becomes off bounds. It's a perfectly good English word. I'll continue to use it.
Well, I think Bob said that he was not going to engage in the analysis. He was not going to make a determination one way or the other. We analyzed the law and the facts, and a group of us spent a lot of time doing that and determined that both as a matter of law, many of the instances would not amount to obstruction as a matter of law.
In other words, we didn't agree with the legal analysis -- a lot of the legal analysis in the report. It did not reflect the views of the department. It was the views of a particular lawyer or lawyers, and so we applied what we thought was the right law.
We live in a crazy hyper-partisan time and I knew it was only be a matter of time if I was behaving responsibly and calling them as I see them, that I'd be attacked because nowadays people don't care about the merits or the substance. They only care about who helps, benefits, whether my side benefits or the other side benefits.
Everything is gauged by politics and that antithetical to the way the department runs and any attorney general in this period is going to end up losing a lot of political capital and I realized that and that's one of the reasons why I was ultimately persuaded to take it on because I think at my stage in life it doesn't really make any difference.
Everyone dies and I don't believe in the Homeric idea that immortality comes by having odes sung about you over the centuries."
agtG
