As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
In the issue of Merrick Garland, as Attorney General of the United States, there are troubling warning signs of promises of another Law and Order official, which has seen nothing but Eric Holder destroying Obama competitors for 2012 AD in the year of our Lord, Loretta Lynch making tarmac deals with the Clintons, Jeff Sessions allowing a coup against Donald Trump and William Barr who punted the ball to Garland over treasonous acts by the Justice, FBI and CIA in coup plots against the President.
So when even Senator Lindsey Graham is braying the praises of Merrick Garland, there are issues in Mr. Garland's past as much as his current statements on white supremacy, as he has already violated what Resident Joe Biden has mandated to Garland, in he is to work for the People, and no one else, and when someone selectively chooses one segment of society, no matter how bad it is, while it is not unlawful, that is not Justice or the Law, it is suing the law to criminalize People in their Constitutional Rights.
With Garland, Biden has drawn a pointed contrast with Trump, whose model of a perfect attorney general was captured in his question “Where’s my Roy Cohn?”, referring to the infamously corrupt fixer known for his vicious advocacy on behalf of Sen. Joseph McCarthy.
When Biden announced his pick during the transition — on the day after Jan. 6 — he pointedly addressed Garland: “You are not the president’s or the vice president’s lawyer. Your loyalty is not to me. It’s to the law, the Constitution, the people of this nation.”
What is troubling for the Lame Cherry is that Merrick Garland has stated he will prosecute white supremacists and others who attacked the Capitol. This blog has asked the questions just how many of these "others" were in fact paid DC and FBI assets. We know one ringleader who is charged was an FBI Station Chief, who was filling the internet with rants, and there is not any way he did not know the FBI was monitoring or collecting such social media. As the FBI does not hire ignorant people, that means this Station Chief was inciting violence to draw in others to frame them, much as the framing of Carter Page and others in the Trump sphere.
We know BLM was there at the Capitol. We know the DC cops let in people. We know that ANTIFA was there. So when Merrick Garland deliberately covers up these groups entire year of violence in America and only mentions these white supremacists, that is a problem in not equal justice and already shows a bis on Merrick Garland's part.
TodayLast modified on Sun 21 Feb 2021 08.13 EST At his Senate hearing on Monday, attorney general nominee Merrick Garland will pledge to prosecute "white supremacists and others" who attacked the ...
There is a huge problem with Merrick Garland as Attorney General using the epitaph White Supremecist. Everyone knows that it means, but what is the reality of what Nancy Pelosi, Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti Defamation League mean is a completely different illegal reality.
The KKK of Senator Robert Byrd was a group of White Supremacists. The easy group thought would be summed up, in only Whites had any rights and they could use violence to enforce the repression of others.
What has taken place in the Obama era, is if someone states, White Lives Matter as Black Lives Matter, they are a White Supremacist. If a Citizen states they cherish Christmas, Protestant Christian morals, equal affirmative action for all groups, they are now deemed a White Supremacist, along with other nuances which have surfaced. People who do not have the Obama BLM screed, have been beaten up, fired from jobs, doxed and ridiculed. People who do not want BLM kneeling against the Flag, are now White Supremacists in this expanded crimes, and that is the problem in this, issues which are not involved with violence, are now being pushed as crimes and that means First Amendment Rights are criminalized deliberately to intimidate people on the Right.
It is a reality that this BLM and ANTIFA, funded by Warren Buffett and George Soros, for the Obama Intifada, is a political thuggery, which was protected by the police state in 2020, and before as Wisconsin Wilding of Whites under Barack Hussein Obama was a criminal reality where Obama never was impeached or investigated, and one never heard Merrick Garland demanding prosecutions of Black Supremacists. This is what is troubling about Merrick Garland as it is one thing to promote high legal standards, like Robert Mueller and James Comey, but it is another to not abuse the law in those standards in your own prejudices and bias.
Merrick Garland rose to prominence in the high crime era of Bill and Hillary Clinton, which ended in 9 11 taking place in agencies were forbidden by Jamie Gorelick from sharing information to protect Clinton crimes.
While Judge Garland had no known part in Ruby Ridge in the murder of a mother while holding her child, nor the burning up of children at the Branch Davidians, where the FBI threatened Reverse Speech pioneer David John Oates to keep silent after they burned up those people and knew all they had to do was stand down and the situation would end. Merrick Garland though did have a hand in the prosecution of the Oklahoma City Bombing. This again is a troubling part of Merrick Garland, as while Timothy McViegh was thought to be executed (He was still breathing when the curtain was closed.), the fact is Terry Nichols, is alive in federal prison, alive because his bomb making materials had the fingerprints of an FBI asset on them, who provided those materials. That is why Terry Nichols is alive and nothing was allowed into this trial about why TOW missiles were being stored in the Murrah Building and it is those warheads which detonated which caused the massive blast.
It is realities such as these which from experience in past bad actors who were Attorney General, brings a conclusion that Merrick Garland is part of a system which has rewarded him, and things in his custody are not completely forthcoming and he never once resigned over other murderous acts which were carried out in the Justice Department.
So when the Judge specifically states he is going after White Supremacists, when what he really means he is going to target framed people, who are now under the expanded "White Supremacist" legal standing,
Merrick Garland is not going to be asked or will answer, why is it not a crime for the Mayor of DC to have painted Black Lives Matter on a street, shut that street down in confiscating it, and the damage to asphalt still cratered by fires, the ripping of paving stones to throw at police is not Black Supremacist and Socialist Supremacist crimes with evidence.
DC is now a masked gulag. Resident Joe Biden has made it a martial law compound. There is no threat from White Supremacists, but the threat is from the regime in all businesses are shut down, and without business, there is not tax money to pay for fire, police, hospital, garbage and sewer. This framing of people by the few on January 6th, has not had Merrick Garland make a statement in why it is not a crime to kill Washington DC, which is what has taken place, not by mobs, but by those who control the police and military state.
Judge Garland is about to take control of the police state. DC is a walled gulag. The city is dead, and that is from policies which have appeared by those who were not in power during the Trump years, using NGO's.
While Resident Joe Biden. has stated he wanted unity, and then handed his hunting down of Americans, which George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, pardoned and never prosecuted in real rebellions, what would have been assuring to the People, would have been Merrick Garland stating, "We are going to address the issues which caused people to riot all summer and on January 6th. We are not going to go after those who were taken advantage of, but we are going to go after who funded BLM,, ANTIFA and if there was any organized payment to what are called White Supremacists And in addressing these issues, we are not going to prosecute people on charges which have become clever ensnarement in indictments".
That last part is something Merrick Garland could calm things down with immensely, as in reading the FBI affidavits' what it seems to say in them, that nameless FBI agents, which means to me UNDERCOVER FBI AGENTS who could have stopped crimes from happening, were there when crimes were taking place.
The crimes though I'm reading, I simply dod not know if they are crimes. One group had mentioned they had police tape they were wearing. Another group wore military clothes. If this is a crime, then why are these items still sold to the public? If not, then is this more Department of Justice clever over reach in ensnaring people on "conspiracy" charges, in having police tape might mean something people were conspiring to do. The law states you have to actually commit a crime or mean to use those things to commit a crime. Just having items is not a crime, and just talking to people about non violent things is Free Speech.
Of course BLM and ANTIFA suckered the MAGA people. The bogus stories of 2020 in non violent protests, as people were murdered, businesses looted and burned, with police beat up, opened a carte blanche which the few who instigated January 6th, as the police stood down to frame the many, to entrap all of MAGA by design as neutralizing the Trump voters was always the base of this agenda, and that came from Mitch McConnell and John Thune as much as Nancy Pelosi.
I would hope that Merrick Garland is as pure as his press claims. The problem is those who like Merrick Garland, in Bill and Hillary Clinton. Eric Holder, Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Biden, have been some of the most crooked people in politics, and if you threw in the Bush family, that would be the worst criminals since Ronald Reagan.
So when Bill and Hillary Clinton wanted Merrick Garland on the OKC, they got the outcome they wanted in a cover up.
So when Barack Obama wanted Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court, he was going to vote just like John Roberts, in betraying America.
So when Lindsey Graham, as John McCain's sock puppet swears what an upstanding man Judge Garland is, I place zero assurance in anything Lindsey Graham says.
If Merrick Garland announced the first day as Attorney General, that he was appointing Sidney Powell as Special Counsel to investigate election fraud, Lin Wood as Special Counsel to prosecute all over reach by the police and military state, and Patrick Byrne as Special Counsel to investigate the Obama Biden framing by bribery of Hillary Clinton, then the Lame Cherry would have something tangible to believe that Attorney General Merrick Garland was as interested in the real crimes of those who get away with crimes, as much as protecting those who have been set up and framed for crimes, which are not a crime.
This is once again, another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
agtG
agtG
