Kid to you it's a cigarette, to the suits it is USDA worth billions, farm chemicals
worth billions, retail worth billions, cancer in the AMA worth billions.
As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
The following letter can not be found archived nor in any media from the 1980's where it originated. You can find it referenced in part, but not in total.
The Lame Cherry's purpose for featuring this evidence is to explain and teach you something about the gulag you are in, whether it is in America or Canada or France or Germany. The letter named the Apocalypse Letter after the author, sheds light on what the permanent dictatorship which rules America and all nations.
What you are about to read requires a bit of background, as most of you have forgotten thee event or were not born yet.
In the history of America in the cover which President John Kennedy in a military confrontation with the Soviet Union which became the Space Race to the Moon, NASA was created. As America under President Ronald Reagan shifted to weaponizing NASA for the military in contracting all Star Wars payloads to be carried by the Space Shuttle, an ambitious schedule was initiated in 24 flights per year.
NASA put great pressure on contractors and this was a disaster as America had assembled the most complicated device in world history in the Shuttle, and it was a miracle that all of them were not destroyed, instead of just two. The Shuttle was launched with two bombs, flew into space with a bomb and returned with a bomb, it was a flying series of massive bombs, and in the Challenger destruction, one of those bombs on the right solid rocket booster burned through a joint, and then burned a hole in another bomb, which blew up everything.
NASA is not just NASA and this requires clarification. NASA is the Washington DC office. NASA is Kennedy Space Center or Cape Canaveral. NASA is Houston JPL and NASA is Hunstville Alabama or the von Braun Center.
NASA operated on launches on Level I, Level II and Level III. I was Florida, II was Houston, III was Huntsville.
Huntsville was the problem in the Challenger for blackmailing Morton Thiokol to agree to launch. That is what the letter below is important to enlighten you with. All of us have had a myriad of psyops run on us from Qanon, Trump WWE, Russiagate, Covid etc.... We have been told bullshit that all the FBI was going to resign if Hillary Clinton was not arrested. This has been on thing which has always puzzled me in. we have all seen the murders of LaVoy Finnicum to Ashli Babbitt and not one person in the Department of Justice turned whistleblower or resigned. How in the hell can not even interagency rivalry as in Homeland not turn the evidence for pecking order, and yet not one person has turned evidence.
How can this be?
Part of the answer to this is revealed in the contents of the letter below. In Huntsville Alabama, a Dr. Lucas had been managing there for a decade. In a decade of management, Dr. Lucas had appointed all the people at Huntsville in senior positions. They understood what was expected of them. Huntsville was not allowed to delay any shuttle launch. The management of Huntsville could not challenge Dr. Lucas. The management of Huntsville in turn bullied all subordinates to not question management.
Huntsville had become a fiefdom of one man and his entourage.
Think for a moment about the FBI. The FBI when it became Robert Mueller's bureau, was transformed to a personality cult which transferred to James Comey to Christopher Wray who were all Mueller's proteges.
You can plug and play the Department of Justice. William Barr was the Bush man who legalize a criminal act in kidnapping foreign leaders for breaking American laws and Merrick Garland is the Clinton man who was part of the Oklahoma City cover up which involved the BATFE giving bomb making materials to the bombers.
People who get appointed to these positions are all insiders or they would not be there. They follow orders, and they revolve out of doors from government agencies to conglomerates.
If one tyrant could in the Reagan era when people were still normal, actually corral an entire space agency as a gate keeper to NASA, then how much more can law enforcement which screens with psychological profiles to obtain a type or universities who prepare through indoctrination the Obama mindset, that woke conglomerates in fellow travelers, have all of these people who once they are on the inside all move in lock step.
When NASA could assemble a caste of those who though they were smarter than everyone else to form a common cause that even affected a Mormon conglomerate by threatening them, then how much more intense could the effect be with people who think with their feelings, are militarily trained, college warped or police state conditioned? We are all experiencing that effect now.
Dear Sir,I am deeply troubled by the Challenger tragedy and the events immediately preceding and following the loss. i am a senior manager at the Marshall Space Flight Center and answered as a member of the MSFC flight readiness review board for all 25 shuttle launches. I have watched in despair as William R. Lucas, MSFC Center Director, has lied time and time again in national news conferences. I have watched in disbelief as he has engineered a cover-up of the MSFC involvement. When I add to this the deep concerns that I and many other senior managers secretly shared preceding the launch relating to the management philosophy associated with determining flight readiness, my conscience tells me to speak out.The Marshall Space Flight Center is run by one man, William R. Lucas. His style of management can be best described as feudalistic. In his ten-year tenure as Center Director, he established a personal empire built on the "good ol' boy" principle. The only criterion for career advancement is total loyalty to this man. The loyalty to country, NASA, the space program, means nothing. Many a highly skilled manager, scientist, or engineer has been buried in the organization because they underestimated the man's psychopathic reaction to dissent. In my own case, I have played the game. I have learned not to debate with him. Not to argue, but to compliment and flatter him. We have learned that we must tell him he is right even though he is wrong in order to survive. Lucas is a classic godfather mentality who corrupts the merit promotion system at MSFC to hold total power over the careers of 3,000 people. In addition to violating the merit promotion system, an investigation would reveal a great many other abuses of power such as using the government aircraft at his disposal for personal trips. Combine this institutional corruption and dishonesty with the usual faults of the government bureaucracy and one has a problem situation of immense proportions. Morale at the Marshall center even in the best of times is very low. Those of us who know him are not really surprised that he would resort to a cover-up in order to preserve his power.There is no major decision which is made at MSFC which Lucas does not approve personally. Everyone within the agency looks to this man concerning the readiness of the shuttle main engines, the external tank, and the solid rocket boosters because the systems are so complex. No one outside the MSFC and its contractors have an in-depth understanding of the systems. This man selected the contractors, selected the government managers (and in some cases the contractor managers), approved countless system and subsystem designs, and many other aspects of this system. To this day, he is still the final approval authority for the continuing stream of design changes to the SRB. No one man in NASA has been more involved in the development, testing, and certification of the SRBs than this one man. No one individual within NASA has done more to place his personal stamp on a piece of hardware than this one man. No one man in NASA has done more to so completely suppress dissent to further his own power than this man. Unfortunately, no one man can hope to make these types of multi-discipline decisions successfully. This man was the individual who okayed the Challenger SRBs for launch over the objections of Thiokol engineers who thought they were too cold. This man, more than any other individual in NASA, is singly responsible for this terrible loss and the deaths of seven good men and women.Lucas could[n't] care less. It is common knowledge among the senior management at MSFC that his primary concern is simply to cover his tail. He engineered a two-phase cover-up at the MSFC. All data and people were locked into the Huntsville Operations and Support Center. Lucas personally ordered his senior management that no one at the center was to talk to the press without going through him first. The cause of the tragedy was generally known within a few hours on the same day it happened. Yet, under Phase I of the cover-up, information was to be withheld as long as possible then fed to the press piecemeal. It was reasoned that the longer the information could be covered-up the better, as the course of world events would eventually tend to dilute the initial shock and public reaction. Some MSFC officials privately indicated that they were praying for another hijacking or something similar "to take the heat off." Once data could no longer be held back, Phase II would be to present as much highly technical data as possible letting the situation in the general public's mind be diluted by various confusing theories which were sure to result. Stories were to be planted which would serve to shift blame away from MSFC to Thiokol and the contractors doing the processing at the Cape.It has been apparent for some time that the flight readiness review process developed by Lucas and other senior NASA managers simply was not doing the job. It was not determining flight readiness. Rather, it established a political situation within NASA in which no center could come to the review and say that it was not ready. To do so would invite the question "If you are not ready, then why are you not doing your job? It is your job to be ready." At each flight readiness review every Center and every contractor are asked to vote on readiness. It is a "no win" situation. For someone to get up and say that they are not ready is an indictment that they're not doing their job. As a consequence the center gets up and basically "snows" headquarters with highly technical rationale that no one but the immediate experts involved can competently judge. Lucas has made it known that under no circumstances is the Marshall Center to be the cause for delaying a launch. Hence, MSFC hardware is now flying with nozzles which have eroded to within five seconds of burnthrough in one case. No one to this date understands what caused the near catastrophe. MSFC's SSMEs are flying with potentially cracked turbine blades due to the same schedule and political pressures. If one of these blades were to come loose, it would be catastrophic.There are dozens of such problems which have been uncovered on the SRBs and the main engines and which none of the experts involved truly understand. Many of these have been glossed over simply because we were able to come up with a theoretical explanation which no one could disprove. We are flying shuttles based on the flawed management philosophy that if no one can prove the hardware will fail then we launch.And, we vote. It is understood that Lucas expects his board to vote for launch. In the twenty-five Center level flight readiness reviews that I have participated, never has there been a single negative vote from a Marshall board member or a Marshall contractor that we are not ready. This amounts to hundreds of yes's and not a single no. This speaks for itself. This process is an exercise in self-disillusionment and illustrates the tremendous gap between MSFC and NASA management decision making and what happens in the real world. The contractors understand that Lucas can get them fired; hence they tell NASA what they know NASA and MSFC want to hear: "We are ready."And, how many times has it been now that we have not been ready? We have had a main engine shut down milliseconds before the SRBs fired (incidentally, one of these occurrences was never fully understood). We have had an abort to orbit; we have had numerous delays and numerous problems. And, now we have had a catastrophe.Perhaps, the most significant tragedy of this Orwellian nightmare that many of us find ourselves trapped within is what happened on the first launch this year. After many delays we finally achieved a successful launch. However, but for the grace of God, we would have destroyed that shuttle and crew. To make a long story short, we experienced an anomaly and aborted launch for that day. In recycling the count we discovered an undetected failure in which a sensor had broken off and prevented a valve from closing. Had we not experienced the other unrelated anomaly, we would have gone ahead with an undetected problem and blown up an engine which would have substantially blown up the external tank destroying the vehicle and its crew. At the Challenger flight readiness review, this problem was discussed and then dismissed. The Commission must look at this event as well.Something must be done here at the management level. Lucas should retire gracefully and a new manager brought in from the outside to reorganize the center. I know of no other way to deal with the good ol' boy Mafia that has evolved over the time Lucas has ruled. Their ineptness and incompetence have contributed to this tragedy.I am planning to retire soon and for obvious reasons do not plan to disclose my identity at this time. However, I have enclosed a copy of a presentation which Thiokol presented to Lucas in July of 1985 clearly outlining the problems with the seal. Nobody really understands the problem and hence no one could disprove the theory. Lucas proceeded at risk rather than have the MSFC delay the program, a classic management error in shortsightedness.God help us all,"Apocalypse"
This is another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
Nuff Said
agtG
