Lame Cherry: The Right of Secession

As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter........

When in the course of Human Events, it becomes necessary to end the matrimonial bounds of a nation due to abuse of those laws, there must be an education in what is the divisible right of all peoples within a nation.

The following are quotes from President Theodore Roosevelt which explain the reality of the group who were headed by military might in Lincoln, Grant and Sherman in not allowing the Confederate South in Davis, Lee and Jackson to divorce her Northern husband legally, but to beat her to death and drag her back to the marriage bed.

After the Civil War the Federalist, dogma prevailed due to the murder of the South by war, in might makes right, and it was to settle by threat that no Sovereign State in these United States could withdraw from the Constitutional marriage or covenant, but it would be only by death do they part.

I place the Roosevelt quotes for examination of both the Jeffersonian view and the later Lincolnian view, which became law by warfare.

The South Carolinian statesmen now proclaimed the doctrine of nullification,— that is, proclaimed that if any state deemed a federal law improper, it could proceed to declare that law null and void so far as its own territory was concerned,—and, as a corollary, that it had the right forcibly to prevent execution of this void law within its borders.

This was proclaimed, not as an exercise of the right of revolution, which, in the last resort, belongs, of course, to every community and class, but as a constitutional privilege.

Jefferson was quoted as the father of the idea, and the Kentucky resolutions of 1798-99, which he drew, were cited as the precedent for the South Carolinian action. In both these last assertions the Nullifiers were correct. Jefferson was the father of nullification, and therefore of secession.

He used the word "nullify" in the original draft which he supplied to the Kentucky legislature, and though that body struck it out of the resolutions which they passed in 1798, they inserted it in those of the following year.

Theodore Roosevelt. Thomas Hart Benton (Kindle Locations 894-901).

The United States has the same right to protect itself from death by nullification, secession, or rebellion, that a man has to protect himself from death by assassination.

Theodore Roosevelt. Thomas Hart Benton (Kindle Locations 905-906).

I have always believed in my heart that secession was a legal reality, no matter how much I respected General William Tecumseh Sherman or President Theodore Roosevelt, for where there is legal right to revolution, which is simply a more violent form of anullment or secession, there is the legal separation also in marriage.

The Bible equates in pure form ,till death do you part, but it also allows for human frailty the reality of divorce for infidelity or endangerment of life. In a pure Sherman or Roosevelt world of dogma, it would be that a State would have the right to take up arms to revolt against a federal system, but not be allowed with a document to take up a pen to save itself from being destroyed.

Does a state like North Dakota, which is productive in oil and grain, share a death of America in a socilist Obama invasion of California, which is destroyed?
Where in the reality of a husband in New York destroying the family home, finances as he drives the Obama green car over the edge of a cliff, does not the wife have the legal right to undo her safety belt and jump from that automobile to save herself and her children?

America is a nation, which is a people of pirates, as most nations are. America by sea commerce in celebrated Yankee Traders out served and out gunned other nations, as America did in taking territories not her own by foot traffic, trade and war.

America also under Thomas Jefferson exemplified the greatest land purchase in history from France for the American interior, a new form of adding territory, and other nations using that territory as a bribe in a wife who was going to run off with America in a few decades any way. In that, we must examine was France legally right in selling their Louisiana wife to the American master for exploitation, and was it legal for America to buy a nation as it was agreed upon, when the inhabitants perhaps had other legal realities in the courts of Spain, France and England stating the inhabitant settlers there owned the land.

When William Rogers Clarke annexed the Illinois territory from the British in war who took it from the French in war, was any of this chatel of states legal really, or was it simply might makes right?

I do not mean to debate any of this, but to show that when nations agree to trade wives, then all is legal. When nations do not agree to trade wives, then all is illegal and fought over in wars, where the victor decides how best to rape that state of a wife to their profit.

That is why I do not descend to the federal view that States who enter a Union by a Constitution peacefully by petition, do not have the right when that nation is abusing them or endangering them to not by same petition, nullify all harmful laws as in Obamacare or to secede from that Union by the vote and pen, in order for that state to save herself from a federal wife beating master.

If secession is illegal, then so is all divorce in human matrimony. The ludicrous nature of the pedophile tribe in making marriage into sodomy now, is further proof that the federal has no right in any declarations of this or any matter, as they change the rule of law to suit their political rapine of the moment.
When the American faggot is of no use to the destruction of America, the American faggot will be dispatched like so many Indians of yore. The American Indian survives not for right, but for the right of the feudal regime to launder money and contraband from those harlots of the hinterlands.

It is all an examination of reality in Ronald Reagan was an equal to Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis and Thomas Jackson in States Rights. All of the above, desired redress of grievances inside the system of the United States Constitution which is indeed correct.
It is ludicrous for a any State to petition and vote peacefully for admittance into a Union and then be deprived of that same measure to leave, and instead have federal armies launched to murder that State if she tries.

No State of the 50 ever took up arms to force Washington DC to admit them to the Union. That is the reality of this enterprise and experiment. The only people, including Thomas Jefferson who are interested in the forced murder of States who will to divorce are those housed in the illusionary entity of the United States of America in Washington.

You must comprehend this. Before the Civil War, America was correctly named THESE UNITED STATES as they were all Sovereign States of their own Right. The Continentalists knew and promoted this. The Confederated States after the Revolution espouses this as the reality. The Federated States after ratification of the Constitution of these United States were wed to it, but after the murder of the South in 1865, it was the federal which became America, and not the States in direct violation of the 10th Amendment.

America has been an outlaw nation since 1865 when she butchered her Southern wife. There is no clause in the Constitution which does not allow secession. It is the federal system which exists on paper in limited form for the purpose of organized taxing, organized warfare, which is all the Constitution provides for.
In reality, the marriage of the 50 States is not a marriage bed, but one of convenience where the State is provided guns and for the tax credits she provides the Government in defense of her bed.

I do feel deeply about this as Truth is Truth and Right is Right. It does not make any difference what wife abuser has indoctrinated upon the people of America, as the legal reality is any State has the Right to leave America as she entered into the Union, and to ignore any federal law mandated by that fictional nation of the United States.

Ask yourself, where is this United States we hear of? Name on piece of ground anywhere in this world which is a nation called the United States which produces it's own taxes or population. The District of Columbia is not a nation nor a state. It is allocated land for this fictional illusion to reside with extremely limited powers alloted to it for responsible taxing and responsible defense of the People of These 50 United States.
You can find California, Indiana, Delaware or Alaska on a map, as those Sovereign States do indeed exist beyond paper, but you will never find the entity known as the United States of America, as it does not exist. There is no United States, but these 50 United States grant a federal system to appear on paper for the common good, which does not include federal sodomy religions nor state aborticide religions favoring groups over other groups in tax allocations or police state defense.

That is the reality of this, of all of this. It is a reality of you can wear a white sheet of the Ku Klux Klan in Detroit whereby the blacks there will murder you in their right. You have the right to offend and they have the right to murder, when the federal system is empowering ludicrous injuctions.
A woman has the right to say NO to sex, but if the man rapes her, that is his right to disregard the other right. Unless there are protections under the law, both sides will be outlaw in their conduct in not addressing the real issue.

South Carolina had the right to secede. The Union then raped that state, and as a piss on the face, sent in blacks in war to shoot South Carolinian's "legally" in battle to humiliate those peoples. It is always a matter of might, and the blacks were sent in to be slaughtered and had no rights in uniform, no more than their idiotic military leaders leading that charge against inflamed Carolinians being gang raped by the Union, deprived of her rights and redress.

One can see the reality of the savagery and barbarity of the current federal system of abuse, which brought to utter ruin America, but when Americans sought redress on Obamacare for example, the corrupt Judiciary sided with the wife beater executive to force the States to submit to ill and homicidal mistreatment.

That is what is completely incorrect in the Theodore Roosevelt maxim of States have the right to revolution but not secession. That is exactly what King George's government relied upon in brute force when the Colonies attempted redress of wrongs. It is far better for any State at odds with a federated system of tyranny, to simply by majority vote to alert the federal Congress, Executive and Judiciary that, that State was withdrawing from the former Contract of Union, formed in civil means and not battlefield means.
While a State is within a Union, the federal has certain protectionary responsibilities to the federal and other States in governing that State for the order of the Union, but once a State petitions withdrawl, that Federal in any triad form has no right to send in troops, to punish or outlaw by Judicial review that Peoples action, no more than it has to dictate to China or Russia, and it is seen that federated outlaw system has a penchant for trying to enforce on peoples not American from Panama to Libya, a DC rule which is illegal internationally as Libya or Panama denying America her rights on the coastal seas of those nations.

As this blog has shown, secession from These United States is legal and what is illegal are the police state rapine in keeping States from those unalienable Rights.

When irresponsible taxation and debt, when dictates as Obamacare are foisted upon these 50 United States, to their harm and utter ruin, that federal system is no longer a protector, but an antagonist to those States. When such a reality is brought before the courts in marriages or corporations, the guilty parties are not promoted, but the innocent are allowed redress in divorce or disbanding of said corporation.

The federal system holding these 50 United States hostage is illegal. That is the reality of all of this, and it should not be a matter where Arkansas must raise an army of millions, obtain fighter jets and nuclear bombs in order to protect itself from a federal criminal system, which would state that Arkansas would be criminal in so doing this, when Arkansas does have that right to arm it's militia in any form to protect itself from not foreign but federal incursions.
No state, like a poor wife can afford an entire police force for her protection, so the legal Right is to divorce or secession.

If the Union had not been using the laws of these United States against certain Southern States for their subjagation to other Northeast States which was criminal, and then put in the trip wire of Abraham Lincoln who would ruin the South in depriving them of legal property at the time in a fortune in slaves, and the ability of the land to produce indigo, cotton and tobacco for those States life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, then the South would have not undertook after decades of attacks making them criminals to secede.

A beaten wife who shoots her twenty year abusive husband is no more a criminal than South Carolina defending her person from Northern assault for 20 years of rapine.

It is all an organized feudal propaganda though meant to keep States from their unalienable Rights in conditioning them that they do not have the Right to protect themselves by secession. That Civil War is the bat hanging on the end of the bed post telling those 50 American wives of state, what awaits them if they dare speak of their Constitutional Rights.

Those who protect this corrupt Union of states at all costs have brought about the destruction of These 50 United States at all cost.

Lame Cherry

Any State Government in their Constitution, has the power by the Federal Constitution in the 10th Amendment to Secede. That is the law of the land, and it is what Thomas Jefferson wrote when he was still a man of the pluribus.

"The Union; next to our liberty the most dear; may we all remember that it can only be preserved by respecting the rights of the states and distributing equally the benefit and burden of the Union."

Vice President John C. Calhoun

(and to the clever little propandists who only feature wild haired and eyed portraits to smear John C. Calhoun in his quest for States Rights over federal enslavement, it will not undo the reality of Vice President Calhoun in stating that LIBERTY was joined to the Union and without Liberty or responsible redress of grievances, the Union could not stand and was no more than the monarchy which was thrown off in 1776.
You must not be taken in my children. The clever tyrants place madman portraits of those who championed these United States for the purpose of smearing all Patriots too.)

Without States Rights over the federal union, there are no Rights nor a Union.

Lame Cherry

Towards the close of Adams's term, Georgia had bid defiance to the mandates of the Supreme Court, and proceeded to settle the Indian question within her borders without regard to the authority of the United States, and these matters were still unsettled when Jackson became president. Unfortunately he let his personal feelings bias him; and, as he took the Western and Georgian view of the Indian question, and, moreover, hated the Supreme Court because it was largely Federalist in its composition, he declined to interfere.

David Crockett,himself a Union man and a nationalist to the backbone, rated Jackson savagely, and with justice, for the inconsistency of his conduct in the two cases, accusing him of having, by his harmful leniency to Georgia, encouraged South Carolina to act as she did, and ridiculing him because, while he smiled at the deeds of the one state, when the like acts were done by the other, "he took up the rod of correction and shook it over her".

Theodore Roosevelt. Thomas Hart Benton (Kindle Locations 1066-1073).