As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
I was reading various Mockingbird accounts that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were radicalized for some time. (Never mind for the 3rd terrorist who ran away, somehow without being shot, in a hail of bullets, and has been apprehended, and somehow now has disappeared from every news report, wiped from your thought processes.)
Meanwhile back at the FOX news story featuring the assessment of the very fine FBI.
"Officials investigating the San Bernardino, Calif. terror attack are looking very strongly into the possibility that Tashfeen Mailk, the wife accused in the shootings, was “an operative,” an official told Fox News on Tuesday.
A law enforcement official said authorities are certain Malik was radicalized before she came to the United States, and are looking very closely at her family overseas as also being radicalized.
Malik was one of just 519 Pakistanis allowed into the country last year specifically to marry a U.S. citizen. Her path to the United States has raised warning flags on the U.S. government's immigration vetting practices after she was identified as one of two attackers in California.
On Monday, the FBI said that Mailk and her American husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, had been radicalized “for quite some time.”"
Ah where is the third terrorist? I might answer that, but first a notice that from Day One, someone named the Lame Cherry, stated that Tashfeen Malik was an operative.
Incredible eh? The Lame Cherry right again and days before anyone could catch up and they are still not telling you by deliberate censoring of the information who Mrs. Muslim Mini Skirt was working for.
Meanwhile back at the terrorism radicals..........
I was wondering what difference there is between Radical Muslims and Non Radical Muslims, as history has not been able of showing any difference.
So let us look at the Radical Islam, as explained in an online dictionary, exactly as ISLAMISM.
Is·lam·ism (is-lä'miz'?m, iz-, is'l?-, iz'-)
1. An Islamic revivalist movement, often characterized by moral conservatism, literalism, and the attempt to implement Islamic values in all spheres of life.
2. The religious faith, principles, or cause of Islam.
OK so the opposite of Syed Farook is immoral liberalism, figurativism and the laise faire of Islamic values can be picked or chosen.
OK so Syed Farook was according to the FBI "radicalized", which seems to mean devout like Muhammed was a radical who did the same things which Farook and Malik did.......and that third Muslim who has disappeared.
OK so you got the 9 11 terrorists, boozing it up, getting strippers and being with whores....and that Nidal Hasan who seemed to like booze, strippers and whores too.....are not radicals.
The way I examine the evidence in this, is right back to the history in you got radical Farook blasting people while not boozing and whoring, and you got non radical Hasan boozing and whoring blasting people. The evidence becomes the reality that you got the same results as a Muslim pulling a trigger, radical or not, gets the same terrorism.
Most vital in this, you got the same 1.6 billion Muslims enabling all of this terrorism, as one would conclude if Islam was not promoting terrorism and enabling it, that it has been a number of years since September 11th, 2001 that Islam could have stamped out all this terrorism......but Islam does not, because Islam creates terrorism as that is what Islam is.
It does not matter if it is some pointy head Heritage Koch groupy named David Forte, listing five different types of Islam and rending that Kharijites is the form of radicalism which is today, because Islam is like cancer of the brain, cancer of the colon, cancer of the liver, cancer of the prostate, cancer of the pancreas, as the operative word is cancer, just as the operative word is Islam.
The FBI is apparently in a quandry of semantics. Oddly the FBI does not seem to associate that the "radicalization" of Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, appear associated with the creation of the Birther Hussein Obama. Both Farook and Malik before Barack Hussein Obama appear to be the type of Muslims who would like booze and strippers. After the ascension of Barack Hussein Obama they are the Muslims who do not like boozing and whoring.
Let us not though focus on radicals or free radicals, as the FBI has that all worked out and is not in any need of a Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.
Let us though glimpse behind the veil of something vanishing 3rd Muslim Shooter.
Remember when the Lame Cherry reported that Farook and Malik were at home, waiting to be picked up by a coyote who was supposed to transport them to Mexico, where they would fly into Africa, then London, and then Pakistan?
Remember how the cops flushed them in a running gun battle?
Now for some insider California stuff.
Jeff Rense thought it odd that the terrorists were driving around and by the original crime scene. Here is the reality of that reality.
The Farooks were about 1 mile from the original shooting site, and in the final public execution site, it is by the Muslim enclave of Coulston Street. This is where the Farooks were headed. They were trying to make it back to their transport medium who could get them into Mexico. They were running toward the very minder who had turned them in.
You must understand this point in after all of this public execution, and confirmed reports of the third person in the vehicle who "ran away" was apprehended, the police still had the area cordoned off at midnight and 5 helicopters were circling the valley.
I am going to explain this using inquiry to sort all of this out.
This is going to seem complicated, but it will sort out simple.
There were 3 Muslims in the black SUV. One was Syed Farook. One was Tashfeen Malik. One was an informant for the California State Police. Tach II alerted the police not to hose down the vehicle until the vehicle was stopped and the informant would flee.
The police reports which conflicted in the suspect being captured, the suspect being searched for and the suspect released, are all correct, and the same suspect. The informant was taken into protective custody, the area was searched for to give the appearance to other Muslims that the information was not an agent of the state, and this same informant was released.
That is what the cover stories were about and clouded with concerning the checkpoints into the next day. That police surveillance was not for the informant, but that host of other Muslims who had been seen coming and going from the Farook apartment.
That should be Nuff Said at this juncture.
Post a Note: For those bright children asking about the 3rd shooter if they were at the Jerry Brown cripple hog trough, he was there. His gun was loaded, and he was shooting, but he was missing targets.
The police were supposed to have stopped this and is why they were there in a few minutes. Things sort of go wrong like 9 11 in those terrorists are slippery and......well somehow notes get misplaced when someone else wants some other scenario to foment.
Is what inquiry points to.