Tuesday, October 4, 2016

From a Democratic Insider why Hillary Clinton has Lost 2016


As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

The Father of the Patriot Act, yes it was Gary Hart who wrote the White Paper on the Patriot Act before 9 11, and the very act that President George W. Bush, and all of Congress signed into law without reading it, spoke to Vanity Fair in a very interesting perspective of what the Democratic Party is, and with the Lame Cherry adding insight, it would assist many in this country to understand the rejection of Hillary Clinton across the board.
This reality is important, because it has nothing to do with a Nixon Reagan collapse on the GOP as Hart theorizes, but has to do with what took place in 1984 AD in the year of our Lord, when Gary Hart due to Vice President Walter Mondale, lying that he won a debate, and Hart being involved in a sex scandal with Donna Rice, lost the nomination in a split nation, which revealed 25 young globalist prosperous states voting for Hart and the rust belt old voters voting for Walter Mondale.

There is not a collapse in the Nixon Reagan Blue State, but a resurgence of this Republican Democrat group, against the Rockefeller Bush patricians, who are the Neocons. In Gary Hart, one can feel the angst he has for the Clinton mismanagement of the Democratic Party, and how it lost itself. It centers now on Hillary Clinton who not a Democrat at all, but a Neocon who has hijacked the party as Barack Obama has.

Gary Hart is careful not to mention the disaster of Barack Obama, to avoid the racism charge and to bring forth the comparison how Obama has been Bush on Estrogen. There are things in this which Hart does not comprehend for his focus is on the Welfare of FDR and LBJ, when the problem in the Democratic Party is not Civil Rights or caring for the poor, but their failing is Sodomite Sin and importing militant and slave invaders.

I don’t think she or those around her have fully understood the ground shaking that is going on under the Democratic Party. It’s more obviously under the Republican Party because of the rise of Trump and the kind of collapse of the Nixon-Reagan coalition. But the same, probably less visible, shaking has been going on under the structure of the Democratic Party.

In the following damning statement on the Clinton's, Gary Hart lets the cat out of the bag in what was Clinton policy. It had to do with bribing shattered home mothers, as in single parent homes to have Bill be their "daddy" in the Nanny State, and make them work instead of being around for their families. 

This was the fact, and for those who were not there or have forgotten, Bill Clinton through Federal Chairman created a bubble in Wall Street which prospered numbers of people in speculation in the new venue of the internet. That speculation collapsed and ruined millions of Americans, who still have not recovered from Clintonomics.
What followed was the Clinton recession of 1999, which was only punted down the road by George W. Bush dumping the 1 trillion in taxes Clinton collected in "retroactive taxes" from Americans, after 9 11 to ward off a global depression which was initiated in 2008 to install Barack Obama, and Americans, especially Democrats have been vanquished by this Obama Super Depression of no growth compared to a Reagan Expansion, and being told to go sodomize themselves to death, instead of speaking to the problems of Democrats and the nation.

Much was made out of the Bill Clinton years in the 1990s, where he dismantled the Democratically constructed welfare system, partly justifiably and partly not. It was premised on a never-growing economy where single working women would find jobs and be able to support their children. And it worked for a few years until the collapse of the economy in the early 21st century. And then single women, who were not receiving public assistance, were not finding jobs, and I don’t think that the Clinton welfare reformers had thought through what would happen to poor working people. And many poor people are working people, not unemployed people. They want jobs. But when those jobs are not available, that’s then a kind of failure of that welfare reform.

The Democratic Party is not the party of Bill Clinton, but the party of Birther Obama and Hillary Clinton, Neocons at heart, who manage a party of billionaire elite receiving 20 trillion in Treasury welfare to Wall Street, and the party of bribes to a genocided Black and White middle class, to be replaced by a militant Muslim and Mexican slave labor group.

There is a reality which needs to be faced in ANY Economy that it must expand, and as a Lame Cherry exclusive this will be explained for the first time as no one has ever touched this.

Think about it this way. When prices are going up at 10 percent a year, and you are getting a 1% raise, are you keeping ahead of your bills as what you are living now? If you have a business or the costs of your going to work, at 1% can you afford a new car, work clothes, lunchtime dining out, or replacement equipment if all you are investing in your business is 1% when it requires 15% a year to just keep things from falling apart?

Call this the Lame Cherry Economic Balance of Nations, and I will expand upon this, as this has never been dealt with in Keynesian Economic managed misery which is what Clinton and Obama have imprisoned everyone to in poverty.
The US economy or any economy can not operate at Obama 1% "growth" as everyone is being lied to. No economy can survive if it is operating at 3% or under, because that is not an expansion, but is only a stagnation, a treading of water, a reality of you not having enough to deal with life in retirement, Obamacare, inflation, when your wages are not keeping pace with the reality of costs of living.
A national economy is exactly like your economic situation, in it MUST expands at, at least 4% and above as in the Reagan era, in order to produce the necessary upkeep on infrastructure like roads, airports, bridges, schools etc... That is why everything is falling apart in America. Under Clinton, Bush and Obama there never was an economic expansion, but only a managed misery of a languishing economy, which could not keep up with what the Citizen depends on in protection and roads for their communities.

The Obama economy at .9% is not an expansion, but a controlled implosion of every American's finances, because that kind of stagnation erodes everything an American has worked for, as Gary Hart was correct in stating these Americans not unemployed, but Americans who want to work, but are being deprived of jobs, and that is what Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are enslaving the American working class to, by this negative growth, because without 4% economic growth each year, a nation is imploding economically, and all that takes place is robbing the Citizen by low interest rates for the oligarchs taking their money and inflating their Wall Street stocks, which is not an economy at all, but has a legal definition of piracy and the grande theft.

When a people build a nation, that means roads to conduct commerce on for jobs and a military to protect  that commerce, and that requires 4% or above growth to service that maintenance or that nation crumbles to Obama Clinton rubble of riots in the streets of Black Lives Matter.
Forensic Economist Lame Cherry

This is the first time this has ever been addressed to deal with cartel Obama Clinton propaganda which has been lying to America in every outlet from FOX to the New York Times, that America has an expanding economy, when it has a stagnation managed misery, and the fact is that if the Obama economy had solved the degradation of the Bush Clinton Bush stagnation, there would not be a Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders and it would be Hillary Clinton with a 50 point lead over Jeb Bush.

The reason the Democratic party is in anarchy, the GOP has been demolished and rebuilt by Citizen Trump in the working structure of Nixon and Reagan Americanism, is because of the Neocons of Bush, Clinton and Obama, who have been managing misery in the Prescott Bush and Franklin Roosevelt community organized suffering.

If Gary Hart was as intelligent as his delusions, he would have understood why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, in a full explanation of realties. It falls though again to the Lame Cherry in another stand alone exclusive in matter anti matter.