Saturday, November 12, 2016

The Legal Way To Remove Ruth Bader Ginsburg

As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.

This last act of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg overreaching all semblance of peaceful transition of power in Ms. Ginsburg wearing in open court a DISSENT COLLAR, challenging the election of Donald Trump as President by the American People is a direct violation proper behavior by a Judge, who is to be impartial and not political.

Ms. Ginsburg has in this Obama regime been caustic in involving the US Supreme Court in political conflicts, which is a violation of the Office of Justice of the Supreme Court.

In this, there are no set protocols for removing a Justice, and has been lumped into the realm of other civil servants which the Constitution advocates the process of impeachment. There is though an existing Constitutional provision in Courts can be created, but none higher than the Supreme Court.

There are actually three legal methods to remove a reprobate like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which do not require the entanglements of impeachment.

There are courts of review of Judges and the courts, and in this, the Lame Cherry advocates that the Trump Administration immediately in January 2017 AD in the year of our Lord introduce to Congress a need for Judicial Review of a Special Tribunal to hear evidence concerning Bader Ginsburg's violation of the Supreme Court for her dismissal.

The Supreme Court is the only federal court that is explicitly mandated by the Constitution. During the Constitutional Convention, a proposal was made for the Supreme Court to be the only federal court, having both original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction. This proposal was rejected in favor of the provision that exists today. Under this provision, the Congress may create inferior (i.e., lower) courts under both Article III, Section 1, and Article I, Section 8. The Article III courts, which are also known as "constitutional courts", were first created by the Judiciary Act of 1789.

There is also the option in President Harry Truman created loyalty review boards to discharge government employees. As President Bush created Homeland Security, a same board could be created to review Bader Ginsburg and other Justices to dismiss them.

In March 1947, following the war, President Harry S. Truman established loyalty review boards to discharge civilian government employees who had been disloyal during the war (Exec. Order No. 9835, 3 C.F.R. 627 (1943–1948), revoked by Exec. Order No. 10,450, 3 C.F.R. 936 (1949–1953).

President Bush also created the Homeland Security Department by executive order, before Congress authorized this cabinet-level department (Exec. Order No. 12,228, 66 Fed.Reg. 51812).

The last is the oldest of removal methods in the President could order the Attorney General to convene a Grand Jury, who would hear the evidence against Ruth Bader Ginsburg and hand down an indictment for removal from office.

Grand jury - Wikipedia

A grand jury is a legal body that is empowered to conduct official proceedings to investigate potential criminal conduct and to determine whether criminal charges ...

Granted some are novel living Constitutional breathing activities, but considering that these Justices have been signing off on Sharia law to not recusing themselves on cases as Obamacare, law and order has a creative precedent now for a President where simply convening some body from the Executive, overseen by the Judicial Branch for dismissal, and it is equal to a Congressional long process impeachment, as this is completely Constitutional, as there is not an explicit article for removing a Supreme Court criminal.

In this Obama reality, therefore, the Trump Administration simply needs to act on January 21st in putting together a legal body and by the next week putting a different collar on this seditious Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It is time Americans be assured that no one is above the law, in disrupting the order of their Government, and answering to the People.