Robert Mueller Meddls in the 2020 Elections

Everyone is guilty of something, except me.

 

As another Lame Cherry exclusive in matter anti matter.


Robert Mueller is a person who is the worst sort of law enforcement officer, as his expression of the law is a violation of the Constitution as Eric Holder's was in protecting criminals in the Obama's and Clinton's, in Robert Mueller when he looks at the law, sees a Muslim view that all actions are guilty and deserve damnation, instead of the American Law, based on the English Golden Thread, that Mercy prevails in human frailty in all are innocent until proven guilty.

There simply is not mercy in Robert Mueller's heart. I will give you a good example I heard recently.

A Montana cowboy was driving a semi out of Butte Montana, and there is quite a steep hill there, and he came hauling down  that pretty good, and a highway patrol was  there, and lit him up.
The highway patrol walked up and said, "I clocked you doing 128 miles per hour coming down that hill. There ain't a jury in this country that is going to believe that you could get that semi going that fast. I am not ticketing you, but don't let me ever catch you going that fast again,"

That is common sense law and honestly most law enforcement without setting quotas for money arrests, see things every day, that they just do not bother with as most drivers are screwing something up.

If Robert Mueller was in Montana, he would have impounded that semi, prosecuted, lost the case, spent a fortune doing it, but like the Frenchman in Les Miserables, think the law was more than the man.

In reading Robert Mueller's feckless statement on the investigation he was unleashed on, he knew very well that he was supposed to look for foreign meddling in elections and whether anyone interfered in that investigation. In Mueller's assessment, the American People are not bright enough to not be brainwashed by Russian propaganda. In Mueller's assessment, people being trapped by the FBI are criminals, when his investigation gets into areas which have nothing to do with collusion or obstruction.

For the record, Paul Manafort did nothing in collusion or obstruction..

For the record, Mike Flynn did nothing in collusion or obstruction.

For the record, George Papadopoulos did nothing in collusion or obstruction.

For the record, Roger Stone did nothing in collusion or obstruction.

Yet all of the above, along with Carter Page have pretty well had their lives ruined. In Robert Mueller's investigation, it is noteworthy that Loretta Lynch, Samantha Power, Susan Rice, Val-erie Jarrett, John Brennan, James Clapper, and James Comey who spoke to Robert Mueller  and leaked  information to Robert Mueller, were never indicted or imprisoned, when there is full evidence that most of the above did collude with British MI6, Jewish Mosaad and Italian Security in attempting to help Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump, which is what Robert Mueller was supposed to be investigating, and yet Mr. Mueller failed the American People in that directive from Rod Rosenstein.

Robert Mueller has done the American People and System an injustice by what he stated in his public statement, as he was more interested in the condemnation of the letter of the law, rather than the protection and service the law is to provide.

Robert Mueller accomplished the worst disservice to democrats and liberals who are not gnawing political limbs off in an attempt to influence the 2020 elections by what Mr. Mueller in the most feckless statement ever. Robert Mueller has caused another distraction for President Trump and Republicans, which in turn emboldens American enemies to strike at America. In a world of adults, Robert Mueller served the condemnation of the law, rather than the wise assessment of serving the People to be protected by the law. That is what Robert Mueller is at heart, a person whose laws are there to be scorched earth against an entire world in order for the law to prevail.

Robert Mueller is not a General Patton who understood that to keep the peace in Germany after the war, employed the SS to maintain security. Robert Mueller is not General MacArthur who did not hang the Emperor of Japan after World War II. Robert Mueller is not George W. Bush who understood that he needed to use Saddam Hussein's police state to maintain order in  Iraq after Saddam Hussein was deposed. In each of the above, Robert Mueller would have hung and jailed thousands, and cost millions of more dead in Japan, Germany, Iran and yes, American Soldiers as chaos erupted as Robert Mueller was going to inflict the law upon all, instead of comprehending life is far more important that entire populations in unrest over the condemnation of the law.

That is what is most disappointing in all of the charade of Robert Mueller. He like his protege James Comey like to think they are Jesus on the Mount in being perfect in the law, but they are Pharisees in void of the essence of the law in  protecting humanity from it's  excesses.
Robert Mueller has initiated Congressional impeachment of the President, which is his abuse of power and his abuse of the law. The President will prevail in this, as democrats will rail, but if they impeach the President, the Republicans in the Senate along with vulnerable democrats will find the President not guilty, which is what Donald Trump will benefit from. All of this is unfair and all of this will drive the American people forward in retaliating on democrats  as Republicans were retaliated on for impeaching Bill Clinton.

Robert Mueller is a person who witnesses specks in other people's eyes while ignoring the forest in his own eyes.

We have before us Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who have summed up the Mueller investigation that the President was frustrated in being framed and spoke out about it, which is his right. Robert Mueller in  not finding any obstruction or collusion, instead welds himself to the condemnation of the law, that the President speaking out about political things could be conferred as maybe obstruction.
Robert Mueller would void the President of political speech, free speech and the right to defend himself, while his adversaries were leaking and planting stories to destroy him.  That is what is defined by Robert Mueller in his  world is one where the people who framed Donald Trump were not indicted, but the people who were being framed were the ones Robert Mueller indicted on obscure charges created by FBI questioning.


In all the Special Counsels ever unleashed, only Ken Starr, who was interfered with and smeared by the Clintons is the only one who did what was right for America. Robert Mueller joins a Lawrence Walsh, Patrick Fitzgerald who were nothing but political stooges who concluded from the first day that there was not any wrongdoing, but instead waited around to see who they could indict in some innocent.

Robert Mueller failed as he was a person who could find a crime in any situation and it is he who has now meddled in the 2020 elections, with more effect than any Russian ever could. Robert Mueller is not to be celebrated or condemned, but Robert Mueller should be rightfully judged in history as a person who had the opportunity to restore trust in the Americans System, but instead was someone who allowed himself to become weaponized to interfere in another election cycle by democrats.

Robert Mueller is meddling in the 2020 elections and for that he must be noted.



Nuff Said



agtG

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Remarks as Prepared for Delivery:

Two years ago, the Acting Attorney General asked me to serve as Special Counsel, and he created the Special Counsel's Office. The appointment order directed the office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign.

I have not spoken publicly during our investigation. I am speaking today because our investigation is complete. The Attorney General has made the report on our investigation largely public. And we are formally closing the Special Counsel's Office. As well, I am resigning from the Department of Justice and returning to private life.

I'll make a few remarks about the results of our work. But beyond these few remarks, it is important that the office's written work speak for itself.

Let me begin where the appointment order begins: and that is interference in the 2016 presidential election.

As alleged by the grand jury in an indictment, Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system. The indictment alleges that they used sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information, and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.

And at the same time, as the grand jury alleged in a separate indictment, a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to interfere in the election. These indictments contain allegations.

And we are not commenting on the guilt or innocence of any specific defendant. Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

The indictments allege, and the other activities in our report describe, efforts to interfere in our political system. They needed to be investigated and understood.

That is among the reasons why the Department of Justice established our office. That is also a reason we investigated efforts to obstruct the investigation.

The matters we investigated were of paramount importance. It was critical for us to obtain full and accurate information from every person we questioned.

When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of the government's effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable.

Let me say a word about the report.

More: Read  Mueller's report into President Trump, Russian interference

The report has two parts addressing the two main issues we were asked to investigate. The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

And in the second volume, the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation involving the President.

The order appointing me Special Counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and we kept the office of the Acting Attorney General apprised of the progress of our work.

As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime.

More: Investigation found no evidence Trump conspired with Russia, leaves obstruction question open

The introduction to volume two of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional.

Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that too is prohibited. The Special Counsel's Office is part of the Department of Justice and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy.

Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.

The Department's written opinion explaining the policy against charging a President makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report.

And I will describe two of them:

• First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting President because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents are available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could now be charged.
• And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing.

And beyond Department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.

So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. That is the office's final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President.

We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the Attorney General – as required by Department regulations. The Attorney General then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and the American people.

At one point in time I requested that certain portions of the report be released. The Attorney General preferred to make the entire report public all at once. We appreciate that the Attorney General made the report largely public. I do not question the Attorney General's good faith in that decision.

I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak about this matter. I am making that decision myself – no one has told me whether I can or should testify or speak further about this matter. There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress.

Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis, and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself.

The report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress. In addition, access to our underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not involve our office. So beyond what I have said here today and what is contained in our written work, I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the Justice Department or Congress.

It is for that reason that I will not take questions here today.

Before I step away, I want to thank the attorneys, the FBI agents, the analysts, and the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner. These individuals, who spent nearly two years with the Special Counsel's Office, were of the highest integrity.

I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments – that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election. That allegation deserves the attention of every American. Thank you.